1 / 24

Meteo Mali Agrometeorological Program Evaluation: Preliminary Report

Meteo Mali Agrometeorological Program Evaluation: Preliminary Report. Edward R. Carr Department of Geography University of South Carolina. Assessment Background. June 2011 meeting in Dakar Demand-driven assessment Lessons learned/good practices Scaling up. Assessment Design.

happy
Télécharger la présentation

Meteo Mali Agrometeorological Program Evaluation: Preliminary Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meteo Mali Agrometeorological Program Evaluation: Preliminary Report Edward R. Carr Department of Geography University of South Carolina

  2. Assessment Background • June 2011 meeting in Dakar • Demand-driven assessment • Lessons learned/good practices • Scaling up

  3. Assessment Design Three components • Science assessment • IRI • Institutional assessment • CCAFS • Field assessment • CCAFS/IER/University of South Carolina

  4. Science Assessment Goals • What climate information is provided to farmers? • What is the scientific basis for this information? • What is the translation and dissemination process? • What opportunities are there for improving the quality and relevance products? • What challenges have been encountered in satisfying specific user needs?

  5. Science Assessment February 2012 • Meetings with Mali Meteo • Consultations with AGRHYMET and ACMAD • Review of methods and documentation • Integration with field assessment findings

  6. + Raingauge *Agroclimate o Synoptic Science Assessment Draft Assessment prepared at the end of July 2012 • Example challenges • Difficulty of providing reliable local-scale forecasts • Onset of the rainy season • Timing of possible dry spell. • Need for monthly forecasts • Lack of verification information Mali’s network of meteorological stations

  7. Science Assessment Draft Assessment • Example opportunities • Prospects for improved downscaling • Merging satellite and station data • Using Global Producing Centre (GPC) model outputs to strengthen seasonal and monthly forecasts Distribution of known GLAM villages

  8. Institutional Assessment Learn what institutional factors contributed to program success • Narrative program history • Identification of product development process • Mapping of the changing flow of information, products, and resources in the program

  9. Institutional Assessment June – November 2012 • Responses from 12 informants • Follow-ups ongoing • Draft document prepared

  10. Institutional Assessment

  11. Institutional Assessment Example draft findings • Coordinating group was highly interdisciplinary but informal • Continuous project funding allowed time to learn • Opportunities • Broader focus for information (including livestock and fisheries) • Formalized frameworks that entrench and support the interdisciplinarity of the program

  12. Field Assessment Goal • Identify current impacts of the program on participants • Explain the causes of these impacts • Both extraordinarily difficult to do post-hoc

  13. Field Assessment January 2012 – March 2012 • 36 villages • 18 GLAM, 18 control • 144 focus groups • 720 interviews • Men and women • Young and old

  14. Field Assessment Broad assessment • Livelihoods practices • Agricultural activities • Engagement with NGOs • Engagement with the Agromet program

  15. Field Assessment Analysis ongoing • Over 430,000 data • Validation of controls • No baselines • Too long a duration • Identification of groupings for analysis

  16. Field Assessment Initial findings • Opportunities to build on end-user delivery • Opportunities to better target end-user needs • Current and in preparation for future needs • Opportunities to expand the user base • Heavily focused on younger men

  17. Field Assessment Initial findings • Suggestions of impact • Differential numbers of crops grown/varieties used by those who use agromet data and those who do not • Varies by grouping/agroecological zone • Complex impact by crop

  18. Field Assessment Limitations • Will have difficulty talking about yield impact • Will have difficulty establishing causality for impact Addressing the Limitations • Re-running the survey in February-March 2013 • Qualitative work in selected villages in May-July 2013

  19. Coming soon… Integration of science and field assessments • Will look at science constraints and opportunities in context of end-user demands Rigorous assessment of impact at the end-user level Integrated lessons learned and good practices • Connecting science, institutional context, and end-user impact

  20. Acknowledgements

More Related