1 / 49

April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine Chang

Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization. April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine Chang. Agenda. Project Overview Background Automobile Assignment-based Model Person Assignment-based Model

harlow
Télécharger la présentation

April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine Chang

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine Chang

  2. Agenda • Project Overview • Background • Automobile Assignment-based Model • Person Assignment-based Model • Analytical Intermodal Formulation

  3. Project Overview • In parallel with RTA-funded transit signal priority (TSP) study • Evaluation of impacts of TSP on transit • Uses auto assignment-based multi-modal model • MRUTC-funded focus • Development of person assignment-based inter-modal model

  4. Background: Transit Impacts • Transit travel time • Transit travel time variability • Schedule adherence • Operational efficiency and cost • Ridership and revenue

  5. Background: DTA • Iteration between • Simulation • Shortest path calculation • Path assignment • VISTA software

  6. VISTA-1

  7. VISTA-2

  8. VISTA-3

  9. VISTA-4

  10. Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model • Uses basic DTA approach • p.5 • Enhancements • Simulation: buses incorporated • Path assignment: simplicial decomposition approach (replaces MSA) • p.15 • VI formulation • exact, not heuristic

  11. VI formulation

  12. Gap Function

  13. Simplicial Decomposition Approach • See page 17 • Step 0: based on ff tt, compute first extreme point (all-or-nothing assmt0) • …

  14. SD1 Feasible Space 0 Step 0-A: Initial solution based on free flow tt

  15. SD2 Feasible Space 0 Z0 Step 0-B: Simulate, update tt, calculate new extreme pt

  16. SD3 Feasible Space 0 1 Z0 Step 1-A: Calculate combination of 0, Z0 that min Gap Func

  17. SD4 Z1 Feasible Space 0 1 Z0 Step 1-B: Simulate, update tt, calculate new extreme pt

  18. SD5 Z1 Feasible Space 0  1 1- Z0 Step 2: Converged?  < 0.02 ?

  19. SD6 Z1 Feasible Space 0 2 1 Z0 Step 1-A: Calculate combination of 1, Z1 that min Gap Func

  20. SD7 Z2 Z1 0 2 1 Z0 Step 1-B: Simulate, update tt, calculate new extreme pt

  21. SD8 Z2 Z1 -1 0 2  1 Z0 Step 2: Converged?  < 0.02 ?

  22. SD9 Z2 Z1 3 0 2 1 Z0 Step 1-A: Calculate combination of 2, Z2 that min Gap Func

  23. SD10 Z2 Z1 Z4 3 0 2 1 Z0 Step 1-B: Simulate, update tt, calculate new extreme pt

  24. SD11 Z2 Z1 -1 Z4 3  0 2 1 Z0 Step 2: Converged?  < 0.02 ?

  25. SD12 Z2 Z1 Z4 3 4 0 2 1 Z0 Step 1-A: Calculate combination of 3, Z3 that min Gap Func

  26. SD13 Z2 Z1 Z4 3 4 0 2 1 Z0 And so on until convergence ...

  27. Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model • Captures • Automobile path choice (correct equilibrium solution found) • Transit travel time, tt variability • Transit schedule adherence • operational efficiency

  28. Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model • Does not directly capture • Ridership, mode choice (transit performance measures can be used in separate mode choice model)

  29. Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model • Strengths • Demand input is vehicle trip matrix - typically available • Travel cost is assumed to include only travel time, so not calibration of cost parameters is required • Weaknesses • Mode split is assumed fixed

  30. Person Assignment-based Inter-modal Model • DTA approach • p.22 • simulate traffic movements • calculate intermodal shortest paths • assign person-trips to equilibrium paths • simulate automobile portion of travel paths

  31. Person Assignment-based Inter-modal Model • Enhancements • Simulation: buses incorporated • Shortest path calculation: Time dependent intermodal least cost path algorithm (proof of correctness shown) • Path assignment: simplicial decomposition approach (replaces MSA)

  32. Shortest path algorithm • maintain both cost and time labels • find least cost path • account for transfer costs

  33. SP1 Inter-modal Network some route to D k D j i mode 1 mode 2 transfer

  34. SP2 Link Costs k j i

  35. SP3 Transfer Costs k j i

  36. SP4 Travel Time Labels k D j travel time of least cost path from k to D, when departing k at time t from j on m2 i

  37. SP5 Travel Time Labels k D j travel time of least cost path from j to D, when departing j at time t from i on m1 i

  38. SP6 Travel Time Labels k D j travel cost of least cost path from k to D, when departing k at time t from j on m2 i

  39. SP7 Travel Cost Labels k D j travel cost of least cost path from k to D, when arriving at k from j on mode m2 i

  40. SP8 Check Cost Label k D j i ?

  41. SP9 Update Cost Labels k D j i

  42. SP10 Update Travel Time Labels k D j i

  43. Person Assignment-based Inter-modal Model • Strengths • No assumption of fixed mode split • Ridership impacts can be directly observed • Weaknesses • Demand input is person trip matrix - not typically available • Calibration of generalized cost function extremely difficult

  44. Analytical Intermodal Formulation • formulation on p.38 • cell transmission-based propagation of cars and buses • solves for system optimal least cost assignment of intermodal person trips

  45. Analytical Intermodal Formulation • Summary of computational results: • buses may be held or may skip stops, depending on cost parameters • people may delay entering the transfer cell, and instead remain in the automobile subnetwork if cost of driving is less than cost of waiting at bus stop • FIFO behavior not maintained (depends on number of passengers on bus, cost parameters, etc.)

  46. Analytical Intermodal Formulation • Analytical Intermodal Formulation results are unsatisfactory because model adjusts traffic and person movements to equilibrate path costs. • Simulation-based approaches use simulation to determine the traffic movements, and equilibrate costs by shifting path choices.

  47. Conclusions • Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model captures bus movements and interactions between cars and buses, but does not directly capture mode split, ridership impacts. • Person Assignment-based Inter-modal Model directly captures mode split, ridership impacts, but person-trip data may not be available and calibration of cost parameters would be difficult.

  48. Conclusions • Analytical Intermodal Formulation results are unsatisfactory because model adjusts traffic and person movements to equilibrate path costs. • Enhancements to VISTA, DTA • Bus movements incorporated in simulator • Intermodal least cost path algorithm presented and correctness proven • Simplicial decomposition algorithm for calculation of equilibrium assignment developed

  49. Future Research • Evaluation of TSP will be completed using the Auto Assignment-based Multi-modal Model • Person Assignment-based Multi-modal Model will be implemented in VISTA • Intermodal least cost path algorithm to be coded • computational results on test network will be obtained • No further development is planned for the Analytical Intermodal Formulation

More Related