1 / 29

Plans for Linear Collider Calorimetry Test Beam Work at Fermilab

Plans for Linear Collider Calorimetry Test Beam Work at Fermilab. Andy White for U.S.+European-CALICE and other collaborators. Physics motivation/need. Unprecedented requirement for new level of hadron/jet energy resolution /E ~ 30%/E - Separation of W/Z in hadronic mode:. 60%/ E.

hedwig
Télécharger la présentation

Plans for Linear Collider Calorimetry Test Beam Work at Fermilab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plans for Linear Collider Calorimetry Test Beam Work at Fermilab Andy White for U.S.+European-CALICE and other collaborators

  2. Physics motivation/need • Unprecedented requirementfor new level of hadron/jet energy resolution /E ~ 30%/E • - Separation of W/Z in hadronic mode: 60%/E 30%/E

  3. How do we achieve this resolution? • Particle Flow Algorithm approach • High granularity calorimeter (transverse + longitudinal) • Use excellent Pt resolution of tracker for charged tracks, measure photon energies in Ecal, and Ecal + Hcal to measure neutral hadron energies:

  4. Critical Point ! PFA(s) development relies on MC detector simulation => MUST be able to verify MC Calorimeter response over the ranges of energies required and at high spatial resolution: Comparison of the shower radius in a hadronic calorimeter as predicted by fifteen different MC models of hadronic showers

  5. Goals of Calorimeter Test Beam Program Test MC modeling of detector response  Test detector technologies

  6. Fermilab – Meson Test Beam Facility From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris

  7. Fermilab – MTBF proton beam From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris

  8. From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris

  9. From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris One of the two beamline Cerenkov counters One of three MWPC stations Remote controlled scintillator finger counters Silicon tracker

  10. Operational Characteristics • There are several operational modes: • Proton Mode:Tune beamline for 120 GeV protons that get transmitted through the target. Rates at the user area are limited to 1 Mhz. Maximum rates so far are 200 KHz. • Secondary, or ‘Pion’ Mode:Vary the tune of the beamline according to the momentum desired. Maximum momentum is currently 66 GeV, with rates on the order of 10 kHz. Lowest momentum tune is on the order of 3-5 GeV. (See graph of calculated rates) • Muons: By inserting a beam stop upstream, muons of tagged momentum less than 66 GeV can be delivered to both areas. By inserting the beam stop between the two user areas, muons of indeterminate momentum can be delivered to the downstream area. The former mode has not been tested. The latter mode has delivered 100 Hz of muons to the user area. • Electrons: At low momentum (< 5 GeV), the beamline delivers an enhanced electron fraction, at very low rates. There are intermediate target wheels and sweepers to attempt production of an electron beam at higher momentum. This mode has not been tested yet. • Fast extraction delivers from 20-80 buckets of 20 nsec duration. Each bucket has ~ 500 particles. Can insert beamstop to reduce rate to 0.5 particle/bucket. • Resonant extraction delivers ‘smooth’ beam over .4 sec spill. Spill can be made shorter – down to 10 or 20 msec – thus making more intense beam. • Spot sizes can be made as small as 3-5 mm square (with 120 GeV protons) and as large as 5 cm square. From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris

  11. Components to be tested • Electromagnetic Calorimeter • Hadron Calorimeter • Integrated “tail-catcher” + muon system

  12. Electromagnetic calorimeters Note: Low energy e- tests planned at DESY late 2004 Silicon – Tungsten CALICE, SLAC/Oregon/BNL

  13. Scintillator – Tungsten U.Colorado, Japan

  14. Hybrid technologies (Si/Scint with W or Pb) European (Como, Warsaw, LNF, Padova, Trieste) Kansas/Kansas State

  15. Hadron Calorimeters Analog/Semi-Digital CALICE

  16. Pick-up pads Graphite Signal HV Gas Resistive plates Digital Hadron GEM-Steel UTA, U.Washington, +… RPC-Steel ANL,BU, Chicago, FNAL, Iowa

  17. Muon Detector/Tail Catchers Scintillator-Steel US-European RPC Frascati

  18. Asian participation • Most of the linear collider test beam activities planned at Fermilab so far involve U.S. and European groups. • We would like to invite participation by more of our Asian colleagues. • The coordinator of test beam work is Jae Yu from the University of Texas at Arlington: jaehoonyu@uta.edu

  19. Proposed test beam program ECal: e-- energy scans, 5 – 10 points (inc. DESY overlap) - incident angle, ~3 points - hadron showers in ECal HCal and Tail-catcher , p – energy scans, 1-66 GeV ( p -> 120 GeV) - incident angle scans -  - for tracking studies

  20. CALICE HCAL movable test stand • Holds ECal + HCal + TC • 3-dimensional variation

  21. Proposed test beam program Combined runs (ECal + HCal + TC): e-- energy scans, 5 – 10 points , p – energy scans, 1-66 GeV ( p -> 120 GeV)  - tracking and calibration

  22. 7 – 12/2005 1 – 6/2006 7 – 12/2006 1 – 6/2007 7 – 12/2007 2008 CALICE ECAL X Other ECALs X X CALICE HCAL X X X Other HCALs X X X Combined tests X X X X X X Schedule of proposed activities

  23. Conclusions • A test beam program to study showering in high granularity calorimetry and test new technologies is critically important for LC calorimetery. • Fermilab Meson Test Beam Facility is ready and available for LC calorimeter prototype tests. • Beam and other facility upgrades are being requested. • Several years of testing are foreseen and wider participation is actively encouraged!

  24. Facility Detectors • Two beamline threshold Cerenkov counters can be operated independently for good particle i.d. (50’ and 80’ long) • Two stations of X,Y silicon strip detectors are installed. • Three 0.5 mm pitch MWPC into DAQ + Three 1.0 mm pitch MWPC into the accelerator ACNET control system. • DAQ will be minimum bias triggered during the spill. The data from scintillators, Cerenkov counters, silicon and MWPC go into event buffers. Buffers are read out during and after the spill and this data will be accessible to experimenters. From E.Ramberg/LCWS 2004 Paris

  25. Predicted maximum rates in MT6 as a function of momentum for pions and protons kHz GeV

  26. List of MTBF Memoranda of Understanding (MOU): T926: RICE- Took data in Feb. T927: BTeV Pixel- Taking data in Spring T930: BTeV Straw- Taking data in Spring T931: BTeV Muon- Install over Summer T932: Diamond Detector- Taking data in Spring T933: BTeV ECAL - Install over Summer T935: BTeV RICH- Install over Summer T936: US/CMS Pixel- Taking data in Spring

  27. Status of Fermilab Test Beam • Several experiments have taken data or are currently doing so. Other experiments will be installing in the summer. • 120 Gev, 66 GeV and 33 GeV beams have been delivered. Both fast extraction and slow spill have been tested. • A low-rate, broad-band muon beam has been established • Tracking and DAQ near completion • Either fast spill (0.4-1.6 msec) or slow spill (.02-.6 sec) • Typical operation of 1 spill/minute. Can request higher rates. • ~50 K protons/spill at 120 GeV • ~3 K secondary beam/spill at 66 GeV • Lower momenta will give lower rates • Muon filters decrease beam by ~10-3 • Beam spot sizes of ~3 mm square at 120 GeV Summary of Operational Characteristics } (Beam rates have improved x5 since these results)

More Related