1 / 23

Resolving the jets of Circinus X-1 with Very Long Baseline Interferometry

Resolving the jets of Circinus X-1 with Very Long Baseline Interferometry. James Miller-Jones Collaborators: A. Moin , S. Tingay , C. Reynolds, C. Phillips, A. Tzioumis , R. Fender, J. McCallum, G. Nicolson, V. Tudose. Email: james.miller-jones@curtin.edu.au. Why study X-ray binaries?.

hester
Télécharger la présentation

Resolving the jets of Circinus X-1 with Very Long Baseline Interferometry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resolving the jets of Circinus X-1 with Very Long Baseline Interferometry James Miller-Jones Collaborators: A. Moin, S. Tingay, C. Reynolds, C. Phillips, A. Tzioumis, R. Fender, J. McCallum, G. Nicolson, V. Tudose Email: james.miller-jones@curtin.edu.au

  2. Why study X-ray binaries? • Jets observed throughout the visible Universe • Universal coupling to the process of accretion • Open questions: • Accretion/ejection coupling • Jet launching, acceleration, collimation • Multi-wavelength studies couple inflow, outflow • Timescales scale with compact object mass • XRBs evolve on human timescales: unique probe • Application to AGN (scaling relations) • Also: • Feedback of matter and energy to the ISM • Probes of strong gravity • End products of binary evolution • Implications for black hole formation Image credit: R Hynes Image credit: R Hynes

  3. What can the radio tell us? • Band in which emission is dominated by the jets • Probe of high-energy processes • Outbursts • Resolving power: morphology • Jet collimation, propagation, energetics • Jet/disc coupling in transition states • Hard/quiescent states: • Radio/X-ray correlations • Point-like, faint, yet persistent radio sources • Astrometry • Large-scale structure • Jet/ISM interactions, calorimetry Blundell & Bowler (2004) Dubner et al. (1998)

  4. Powerful outflows from NS • Typically fainter than BH • Powerful jets seen in highly-accreting Z-sources • No evidence to date for ejecta at state transitions • Sco X-1: • Working surfaces move out at 0.5 c • Unseen flow at >0.95c lights them up following core flaring Migliari & Fender (2006) Fomalont et al. (2001)

  5. Circinus X-1 • Neutron star X-ray binary • Confirmed by the presence of Type I X-ray bursts • Nature of the companion is still debated • B5-A0 supergiant? • Distance uncertain • >8 kpc (HI absorption) • 7.8-10.5 kpc (bursts) • 4.1 kpc (X-ray column) • Eccentric orbit (16.6d) • Flares at periastron Linares et al. 2010

  6. Inclination angle • Thought to be close to edge-on from the X-rays • Dipping behaviour • Spectral changes on egress from dips • P Cygni profiles of disk lines Brandt & Schulz 2000 Shirey et al. 1999

  7. Galactic environment • Close to the SNR G321.9-0.3 • Early suggestions that this was the SNR created when the NS was born • Requires proper motion in the range 15-75 mas/yr • Ruled out by HST upper limit of <5mas/yr (Mignani et al. 2002) • Unrelated objects

  8. Resolved radio jets • NW-SE alignment • Arcsecond scales • Variable morphology • Variation of jet axis • No obvious evidence for precession • Outbursts near orbital phases 0.0 and 0.5 Tudose et al. 2008

  9. Jets have inflated a nebula • Jets interact with the surroundings, inflating a lobe • Calorimetry: age < 105 yr, jet power >1035 erg/s Tudose et al. 2006

  10. Jets also in the X-rays • Coincident with radio jets • Morphology suggests a terminal shock on contact with ISM • Wide opening angle: poor collimation or precession • Jet power 3x1035 < Pjet < 2x1037 erg/s Sell et al. 2010

  11. Jets may be ultra-relativistic! • Time delay between core and lobe flaring suggests G>15! • Unseen energising flow • Most relativistic flow known in the Galaxy • Requires q<5o • Implies vjet ≠ vesc • Luminosity >35 LEdd if isotropic Fender et al. 2004

  12. First southern-hemisphere e-VLBI • Radio flares reached ~Jy levels from 1975-1985 • Lower-level activity (mJy-level) until 2006, when flares again reached Jy levels • Triggered 1.6, 8.4-GHz e-VLBI • PA, AT, MP, HO • Compact radio source: • 60 ± 15 mas • 11 mJy (1.6 GHz) • 12-70h after periastron • 0.03<f<0.18 Phillips et al. 2007

  13. Follow-up phase-resolved VLBI • Monitoring campaign over full binary orbit • Only detected at/after periastron passage • Unresolved, compact source • Noconstant quiescent component • Anyultra-relativistic flow must be dark Moin et al. 2011

  14. ToO e-VLBI observations • 8.4 GHz; less scattering, higher angular resolution • e-VLBI LBA observations • 14 hour run (2010/07/28) • 5 antennas (AT, CD, HO, MP, TI), but Tid failed • Orbital phase 0.046-0.082 • Flux density decays from 210 to 80 mJy/beam Miller-Jones et al. 2011

  15. Resolving the jets with the LBA • Resolved jets along a position angle of 112 degrees • Expansion between the two halves of the observation • Expansion speed 35 mas/day Miller-Jones et al. 2011

  16. Simulations: is it real? • Sparse array (4 antennas, 6 baselines) • Use simulations to assess effects of sparse uv-coverage: • Decaying point source cannot reproduce extended structure • One-sided jet cannot reproduce bipolar structure • Moving components smear out the emission • appears fainter • locus appears slightly curved • cannot give bipolar structure • Observed structure is real! • Replace first-half visibilities with second-half model • Extended emission would have been seen if present • Expansion is real!

  17. Visibility plane • Amplitude decreases, minimum shifts to shorter baselines Miller-Jones et al. 2011

  18. What are we seeing? • Unlikely to be a compact, steady jet as in GRS 1915+105 • We see expansion between first and second halves • Probably not flat spectrum; usually optically thin by phase 0.05 • Likely outward motion of expanding, optically-thin ejecta Dhawan et al. (2000)

  19. Symmetric structure • Symmetric structure appears to be real • Are we seeing: • A bipolar ejection? • The symmetric brightness profile of the approaching jet? • Can’t determine from astrometry alone • Observations not phase-referenced • No absolute astrometric parameters for the binary • To hide receding jet needs • Extreme Doppler deboosting • Cloud of free-free absorbing material • Symmetry of expansion makes bipolar ejection scenario most plausible

  20. Ultra-relativistic flow? • 400 mas/d flow should be smeared over 63 beams in 14h • Expansion between two halves suggests 35 mas/d • Assuming ejection at orbital phase zero gives 16 mas/d • No downstream lobes seen to be brightened by G>15 flow • Symmetry also argues against ultra-relativistic flow: • Should not see receding jet: • Unless source is at ~10kpc and proper motion is 35mas/d: • inclination angle is moderate • jets are only mildly relativistic

  21. Opening angle • Jets unresolved • Implies q<20o • X-ray caps have 35o opening angle • Possible precession? • ATCA jet position angle 129 ± 13 degrees • No unequivocal evidence for precession • Requires more VLBI sampling to verify this Sell et al. 2010

  22. Follow-up work • 3 LBA observations in 2011 May • Triggered by e-VLBI • Time-resolved to track moving jet components • Orbital phases 0.10, 0.15, 0.21 • Resolved jets in epoch 1 • Different PA: precession? • Astrometry suggests significant peculiar velocity (160-320 km/s): natal kick?

  23. Conclusions • We have resolved the jets on mas scales for the first time • Symmetric, expanding structure • Appears only mildly relativistic • Ultra-relativistic flow model is becoming ever less plausible • Ruled out by Occam’s razor? • Time-resolved LBA observations around periastron can directly measure component speed and inclination angle • Hints of precession of the jets – follow-up required • Hints of a significant peculiar velocity suggest a natal kick

More Related