1 / 18

[A SSISTIVE ] T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION AND A BANDONMENT

[A SSISTIVE ] T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION AND A BANDONMENT. Katherine Deibel Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington, Seattle. AT only helps when it is used 8-75% of AT abandoned after purchase (avg. rate is 35%) Waste of time, funds, and resources for all involved

hilde
Télécharger la présentation

[A SSISTIVE ] T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION AND A BANDONMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. [ASSISTIVE]TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND ABANDONMENT Katherine Deibel Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington, Seattle

  2. October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World AT only helps when it is used 8-75% of AT abandoned after purchase (avg. rate is 35%) Waste of time, funds, and resources for all involved Learned helplessness and pessimism

  3. OUTLINE • Technology Adoption Overview • Case Study from Peru • Assistive Technology Adoption October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  4. DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS Cumulative adoptions Number of adoptions • Everett Rogers, Sociologist • General model of how new ideas and technology spread • Applied to multiple fields • Has adapted to changes in communication technologies October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  5. DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS Cumulative adoptions • Communication drives diffusion • S-curves • Early adopters • Change agents October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  6. Awareness of innovation • ADOPTION PROCESS Decision Adopt Interest, motivation, and learning Reject October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  7. ADOPTION PROCESS Full Adoption / Integration Confirmation and finalization Adaptation / Reinvention Implementation, integration, and evaluation Abandonment / Discontinuance October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  8. CASE STUDY: LOS MOLINOS • Promote boiling of water in lowland Peruvian village • Only 11 out of 200 housewives adopted boiling • Classic case of diffusion failure Wellin, 1955 October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  9. CASE STUDY: LOS MOLINOS • Ignored local tradition / culture • Overly focused on early adopters • Failure to identify and influence change agents • Innovation-oriented instead of client-oriented Wellin, 1955 October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  10. AT ADOPTION • Survey studies of adoption and abandonment • Longitudinal studies of AT usage • Models of AT adoption • AT design recommendations • Common findings throughout Additional Studies: Phillips and Zhao (1993); Elkind et al. (1996); Wehmeyer (1995, 1998); Martin and McCormack (1999); Riemer-Reiss and Wacker (2000); Koester (2003); Dawe (2006); Shinohara and Tenenberg (2007); Scherer (2005) October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  11. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Involvement in selection process • Unawareness of what is available • Decision of doctors, experts, or insurance company • Decision of caretakers October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  12. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Cost and Effort • Initial purchase • Physical and cognitive effort of usage • Maintenance / replacement costs • Utility : Cost balance October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  13. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Training • Serious time and effort • Presence of professional support • Need for evidence of gains and improvement October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  14. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Integration • Important tasks and activities • Multiple locales and contexts • Relative advantage October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  15. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Aesthetics and Cosmesis • Looks “institutional” or “handicapped” • Colors • Personal style October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  16. FACTORS IN ATADOPTION • Stigma and Hiding • Social perceptions of disability • Past experiences of ridicule, shame, or trauma • Denial or avoidance October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  17. STIGMA CASE STUDY • Stephen Kuusisto • Blind due to premature birth • Actively disavowed his blindness • Mobility training in his early 30s • Guide dog in his mid 30s October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

  18. CONCLUDING THOUGHTS • Adoption is critical for long-term change • Keep adoption in mind • Growing body of research to consult • More: technology acceptance, diffusion methodologies, etc. Contact Information: Kate Deibel <deibel@cs.washington.edu> October 2, 2009 -- Technology and Disability in the Developing World

More Related