1 / 11

The ICF model and survey-instruments

The ICF model and survey-instruments. Niels Kr. Rasmussen National Institute of Public Health, Denmark. Is the ICF-classification useful for classification of survey-instruments and survey based indicators or Are traditional surveys useful for measurements within the ICF framework.

hillary-petty
Télécharger la présentation

The ICF model and survey-instruments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The ICF model and survey-instruments Niels Kr. Rasmussen National Institute of Public Health, Denmark Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  2. Is the ICF-classification useful for classification of survey-instruments and survey based indicators • or • Are traditional surveys useful for measurements within the ICF framework Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  3. Disability measures in European HIS • Background: many approaches to and developments of general/holistic and specific measures of disability in European countries, both in special disability surveys and in multipurpose and HIS surveys, often based on the old OECD concepts and recommendations Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  4. Recent inventories • HIS/HES database developed within the HMP • Survey data on disability, Eurostat working paper • Updated summary inventory • Identification of app. 50 surveys measuring various aspects of disability from all EU-member states and some European Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  5. Classifications used in inventories • Ad hoc, not theory-driven • What is it possible to expect respondents to respond to • Chronic or acute health problems, • Restriction of daily activities/general • Restriction in daily activities/specific • Participation in work and other • Access Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  6. Global disability screening measures • Limitation in daily activities (usually during a two week period • Longstanding illness (limiting) • In most surveys Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  7. Comparability (1) • Activity limitation/general • 5 out of 14 surveys • Activity limitation/specific: • Mobility, sensory, self-care Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  8. Comparability (2) • Different wording of questions or translations • Different recall periods • Differents domains and activities • Different qualifiers and scales Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  9. What is the correspondance between EU-surveys and ICF? • Body functions and structures • Health conditions or diseases • Activities • Participation • Environmental factors • Personal factors Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  10. Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

  11. Problems in operationalising complex concepts for survey purposes • How to translate complex concepts into everyday language • Distinquishing between performance and capacity • Selfreporting of stigmatised matters • Selfreporting of surroundings and contexts and the barriers, effects etc on the individual • Validity, transcultural problems etc. Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

More Related