1 / 14

Internal and External Motivation of Cooperation

Internal and External Motivation of Cooperation. Mizuho SHINADA (doctoral student). Effects of sanctioning system in social dilemma. Positive effects: A sanctioning system enhances cooperation (e.g., Yamagishi, 1986). Negative effects:

hortonm
Télécharger la présentation

Internal and External Motivation of Cooperation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Internal and External Motivation of Cooperation Mizuho SHINADA (doctoral student)

  2. Effects of sanctioning system in social dilemma • Positive effects: • A sanctioning system enhances cooperation (e.g., Yamagishi, 1986) • Negative effects: • A sanctioning system as an addictive drug: The more of it we have, the more we depend on it (Taylor, 1987).

  3. Negative effects of a sanctioning system • A sanctioning system makes people believe that they cooperate for external incentives. ↓ • The sanctioning system reduce intrinsic motivation to cooperate and trust for other people. ↓ • People need severer sanctions to cooperate.

  4. Negative effects of a sanctioning system (cont’d) • An external sanctioning system is a coercer. • Coercion by itself may let people attribute their cooperation to external factors. ↓ Reduction of intrinsic motivation to cooperate • Question: Is it same for an internal sanctioning system ?

  5. Coercion vs. Commitment • When members voluntarily introduce a sanctioning system, they may regard others (and themselves) as cooperation seeker rather than punishment avoiders. ↓ • An internal sanctioning system is a commitment rather than a coercion. ↓ Reduction of intrinsic motivation to cooperate

  6. Purpose of this study • Examining negative effects of an external / internal sanctioning system. • H0: Two sanctioning systems equally reduce intrinsic motivation to cooperate. • H1: An external sanctioning system more greatly reduce intrinsic motivation than an internal sanctioning system.

  7. Experimental Design • Removing Sanctioning Paradigm (Mulder & van Dijk) • Three-person group play social dilemma game. Phase 1: manipulation Social Dilemma trials with a sanctioning system Phase 2: measurement of intrinsic cooperation Social Dilemma trials without a sanctioning system

  8. Experimental Design (cont’d) A sanctioning system is to be introduced by a majority vote. (In fact, the system is introduced always) InternalSanction Condition Control Condition External Sanction Condition SD trials with a sanctioning system SD trials with a chance to vote SD trials without a sanctioning system SD trials without a sanctioning system SD trials without a sanctioning system

  9. Summary: Prediction External incentives • In Phase 1, cooperation rates in external / internal sanctioning condition are higher than in control condition. • In Phase 2, cooperation rates in external sanctioning condition is lowest. Attribution to external factors

  10. Preliminary Results • Cooperation rates (two sessions in each condition) Phase 1 Phase 2

  11. Preliminary Results • In Phase 1, cooperation rates in internal sanctioning condition are highest. • Cooperation rates (three sessions in each condition) Unexpected results Phase 1 Phase 2

  12. Preliminary Results • In Phase 2, cooperation rates in external sanctioning condition is lowest. However, cooperation rates in internal sanctioning condition is much lower than in control condition. • Cooperation rates (three sessions in each condition) Unexpected results Phase 1 Phase 2

  13. Preliminary Results It may be too early to draw a conclusion (we run only two session), but we have to consider why our prediction is not supported by now. • Cooperation rates (three sessions in each condition) Phase 1 Phase 2

  14. Thank You !

More Related