1 / 6

Survey Results and Implications

CTC Faculty Technology Survey Discussion of Results Presentation to the Technology Transformation Task Force Alan Hardcastle Senior Research Associate Washington State University (360) 956-2167 Hardcast@wsu.edu December 6, 2007. Survey Results and Implications.

howell
Télécharger la présentation

Survey Results and Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CTC Faculty Technology SurveyDiscussion of ResultsPresentation to the Technology Transformation Task ForceAlan HardcastleSenior Research AssociateWashington State University (360) 956-2167Hardcast@wsu.eduDecember 6, 2007

  2. Survey Results and Implications • Faculty Support Technology Expansion, Expect to be Consulted • Infrastructure Limits Faculty Use of Technology • Peer-to-Peer Networks Critical • More Training and Time to Use Technology

  3. Focus Group Discussions • Diverse Groups • Analysis Still Underway • General Findings: • Survey Findings Confirmed • Survey Conclusions and Implications Supported

  4. Focus Group Findings – 1(preliminary) • Pressure to use technology for enrollment, efficiency; poor decisions often due to lack of instructor input • Early adopters are way beyond most IT trainers and workshops; they’re learning on their own. • Early adopters are willing to mentor their peers, but they need release time, infrastructure, commitment • Centralized instructional technology library/network • More information/research on effective tools so faculty invest their time and energy wisely

  5. Focus Group Findings – 2 (preliminary) • Don’t assume students have skills: • Need for student technology skills assessments • Developmental courses • Geography matters: • Infrastructure and student demographics (SES) can limit student technology readiness, ability to benefit • Student readiness affects faculty use and experience with teaching tools; obstacles to technology use.

  6. Next Steps • Complete Focus Group data analysis • Complete Final report (Jan. 11) • Subsequent analyses (if requested)

More Related