1 / 19

CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading

CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading. Stephen Stead. CRM-SIG Paveprime Ltd University of Southampton. British Museum July 2017. Agenda. CRMinf: recording Sloan assertions New requirements Proposed Extension Factoid Prosopography Conclusion. E53 Place. E53 Place.

hsamuel
Télécharger la présentation

CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRMinf: Argumentation and Scholarly Reading Stephen Stead CRM-SIG Paveprime Ltd University of Southampton British Museum July 2017

  2. Agenda • CRMinf: recording Sloan assertions • New requirements • Proposed Extension • Factoid Prosopography • Conclusion

  3. E53 Place E53 Place E25 Man-Made Feature E53 Place E24 Physical Man-Made Thing E53 Place E31 Document E31 Document E25 Man-Made Feature Misc 4 X ESL127704 Place of Original Misc 4 text Place of Misc 4 25 text Place of Misc 4 L226 text Marks of Misc 4 X Original Misc 4 Place of Misc 4 X symbol Marks of Original Misc 4 Spatial Relations Between Catalogue Entry Versions (S1) P128 is carried by P128 is carried by P128 is carried by P128 is carried by P53 has former or current location P59 has section P59 has section P53 has former or current location P122 borders with P122 P122 P122

  4. Evolution of Catalogue Entry • A] 4.-> X-> L226-> 25 • B] 4.-> L226->X-> 25 • C] 4.-> L226-> 25-> X • Others?

  5. E31 Document E65 Creation E31 Document E65 Creation E65 Creation E65 Creation E31 Document E31 Document E31 Document E31 Document E31 Document Misc 4 L226 Version 2 Misc 4 Creation of X and Version 2 Misc 4 Creation of 25 and Version 4 Misc 4 Misc 4 25 Creation of Misc 4 Misc 4 X Original Misc 4 Creation of L226 and Version 3 Misc 4 Version 4 Misc 4 Version 3 Misc 4 Evolution of Catalogue Entries (A) P94i was created by P16 used specific object P106i forms part of & P148i is component of P94i P106i & P148i P94i was created by P16 P106i & P148i P94i P94i was created by P16 P106i & P148i P106i & P148i P94i P94i

  6. CRMinf classes: Temporal Entities E13 Attribute Assignment CRM CRMsci CRMinf S15 Observable Entity I1 Argumentation E2 Temporal Entity S5 I7 Belief Adoption I5 Inference Making S4 Observation I2 Belief

  7. CRMinf classes: Others E28 Conceptual Object CRM CRMinf E59 Primitive Value E89 Propositional Object E90 Symbolic Object I6 Belief Value E73 Information Object I3 Inference Logic I4 Proposition Set

  8. CRMinf Argumentation CRM P14 carried out by (performed) I1 Argumentation E39 Actor I7 Belief Adoption CRMinf J2 concluded that (was concluded by) P116 starts J6 adopted (adopted by) P17 was motivated by I2 Belief I5 Inference Making J1 used as premise (was premise for) P17 was motivated by J3 applies (was applied by) P16 used specific object J5 holds to be (is held by) J4 that (is subject of) I4 Proposition Set I6 Belief Value I3 Inference Logic

  9. I6 Belief Value I6 Belief Value I4 Proposition Set I5 Inference Making I2 Belief I3 Inference Logic E39 Actor I2 Belief I4 Proposition Set I6 Belief Value I4 Proposition Set I2 Belief I2 Belief I6 Belief Value I4 Proposition Set True Evolution Decision SdS Belief in Evolution B of Misc 4 SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 Person SdS Evolution A Catalogue Text Rules Evolution B False True False S1 SdS Belief in Evolution C of Misc 4 BM Belief in Spatial Relations of Misc 4 Evolution C Modelling my Beliefs in Evolutions A, B and C P14 carried out by J2 concluded that J1 used as premise J5 holds to be J4 that J3 applies J2 concluded that J5 holds to be J4 that J2 concluded that J5 holds to be J4 that J5 holds to be J4 that

  10. I4 Proposition Set I2 Belief I7 Belief Adoption I6 Belief Value I2 Belief E39 Actor I6 Belief Value I4 Proposition Set BCHK17 Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 Adopting SdS belief True Evolution A True SdS Belief in Evolution A of Misc 4 Evolution A Group BCHK17 Trusting a Belief P14 carried out by J2 concluded that J6 adopted J5 holds to be J5 holds to be J4 that J4 that

  11. The New Bit • Text A- easy to represent content • No desire to document the process • Text B- easy to represent content • No desire to document the process • Text A and Text B disagree • I like A: Why? • Multi-Vocality

  12. Author’s positionLike War HHGTTG, Adams 1978 • Retribution • I am going to kill you because you killed my brother • Anticipation • I am going to kill you because I killed your brother • Diplomacy • I am going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that your brother did it

  13. Author’s position • Report • Author describes what they believe happened • Propaganda • Author describes what they want you to believe happened • Manipulation • Author describes what they want you to think they believe happened OR • Author describes what they think, you want them to believe happened

  14. Proposed Extension I2 Belief CRM CRMinf Ix Reading J5 holds to be (is held by) Jx1 understands (understood by) E73 Information Object I6 Belief Value: Default=“True” Jx2 believing provenance I4 Proposition Set: Provenance Jx3 reading as I4 Proposition Set: Triples of E73 content

  15. Factoid Prosopography http://factoid-dighum.kcl.ac.uk/what-is-factoid-prosopography-all-about/

  16. Mapping Factoid Model to CRM Paisin & Bradley 2012

  17. What the aim is

  18. What it is not • CRM and CRMinf are not AI • No attempt to automate reasoning • The CRMinf extension only for “normal” cases • Anything not “vanilla default” use full description

  19. Conclusion • CRMinf can document use of texts • Full detail not always required • Shortcuts using “normal” values may reduce documentation burden • Development Effort Concentrates On • What are the shortcuts AND • What is “normal”

More Related