1 / 43

Adoption of Change in Hospital Pharmacy Practice 

Adoption of Change in Hospital Pharmacy Practice . Jean-François Bussières B Pharm MSc MBA FCSHP Chef, département de pharmacie et unité de recherche en pratique pharmaceutique, CHU Sainte-Justine Professeur titulaire de clinique, Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal Kevin Hall

hubert
Télécharger la présentation

Adoption of Change in Hospital Pharmacy Practice 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adoption of Change in Hospital Pharmacy Practice  Jean-François Bussières B Pharm MSc MBA FCSHP Chef, département de pharmacie et unité de recherche en pratique pharmaceutique, CHU Sainte-Justine Professeur titulaire de clinique, Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal Kevin Hall B. Sc. Pharm., Pharm. D., FCSHP Clinical Associate Professor Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Alberta

  2. Objectives • To understand the typical trajectory associated with the adoption of change, following the initial availability of evidence supporting the change • To discuss possible ways of accelerating the adoption of evidence-based improvements in the practice of pharmacy

  3. Adoption of change in healthcare Following the availability of evidence supporting the adoption of a new healthcare practice, how many years do you think will pass, on average, before the improved practice will be in widespread usage? • 2 years? • 5 years? • 9 years? • 17 years? • 25 years?

  4. Balas et al.

  5. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement • 1843 • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Boston Society for Medical Improvement • Contagiousness of puerperal fever • Advocated hand washing before examining a pregnant woman … « a revolutionary idea at the time »

  6. ‘Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement’ • Studied nine clinical procedures • Calculated the annual increase in use by dividing the current rate of use by the number of years between the publication of the landmark trial and the reported current use • Average: 3.2% increase each year • 15.6 years required before an innovation is used by 50% of potential users

  7. There was twice as much evidence available in 1995 than there was in 1966Imagine now … 2 x

  8. The nine clinical interventions

  9. Calculated that on average it takes 17 years for research evidence to reach clinical practices

  10. Does the figure of 17 years seem excessive for the adoption of change in hospital pharmacy practice?

  11. Sources of information used to identify key issues in pharmacy practice • Pharmacy and other Scientific Literature • Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Report • CSHP 2015 Survey Results

  12. What information can we glean from these sources concerning the adoption of change in pharmacy practice?

  13. Trends from the HPC Report • Six examples …. • Unit-dose distribution service • IV admixture service • Use of barcodes in the drug-use process • Implementation of computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) systems • Pharmacy technician scope of practice • Pharmacist scope of practice

  14. Adoption of change in Pharmacy Practice • Approximately when was the innovation proven to be beneficial? • What level of implementation had been achieved by 2012?

  15. Source: Parker P. Unit-dose systems reduce error, increase efficiency. Hospitals JAHA 1968; 42: 65-72.

  16. Unit-dose distribution systems 65 %

  17. 2012 minus 1968=44 years and and the use of unit dose systems, full or partial, was reported by only 65% of respondents !

  18. 1978

  19. IV admixture to > 90% patients 64 % in 2012

  20. 2012 minus 1978=34 years !

  21. 1974

  22. Use of barcoding in hospital pharmacy Range of 2-22% in 2012

  23. 2012 minus 1974=38 years !

  24. Computerized prescriber order entry systems

  25. 2008 Emerging evidence but still a lot of unknowns about their impact

  26. Implementation of CPOEs 5% in 2004 9% in 2012

  27. Scope of Practice Changes for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians

  28. Pharmacy Technician Scope of Practice

  29. “The counting and pouring often alleged to be the pharmacist’s chief occupation will in time be done by technicians and eventually by automation. The pharmacist of tomorrow will function by reason of what he knows, increasing the efficiency and safety of drug therapy and working as a specialist in his own right.”,Dean Tice of the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy 1961

  30. 2012

  31. 2012 minus 1961=51 years !

  32. Pharmacist Scope of Practice • “I would establish as the principal qualifications of a clinical practitioner that he bear personal responsibility for the safe and effective use of drugs in a number of patients on a continuing basis.” • Don Francke 1976

  33. Independent prescribing rights for pharmacists Alberta allowed pharmacists to acquire independent prescribing rights beginning in 2006. Since then, what percentage of pharmacists have obtained independent prescribing rights? 4% ? 10% ? 18% ? 50% ? 71% ?

  34. 2012 minus 1976=36 years !

  35. Pharmacy technicians as a supportrole for clinical services 8 to 37% (excluding drug distribution liaison)

  36. Is Pharmacy an evidence-based Profession?

  37. No evidence for clinical activities = higher priority Source: http://www.lillyhospitalsurvey.ca/hpc2/content/home.asp

  38. So why do changes occurso slowly ?

  39. Why do we have such significant gaps between objectives, priorities and implementation ? • Limited resources ($, human)? • Too many competing priorities? • Lack of leadership? • Staff attitudes? • What contributes to the successes that are reported? • Passion and motivation? • Staff awareness? • Incorportation of CSHP 2015 in strategic planning? • Inspirational leadership?

  40. Barriers to change … • Unsuccessful passive diffusion … • Results difficult to understand … • Too much information … • People feel they should not change what works ! • No expertise … • No incentive … • Fear …

More Related