1 / 39

French IRFU Collisioner Days . CEA Saclay, November 27-29th 2013

R&D High Gradient Cavities. F. Eozenou. French IRFU Collisioner Days . CEA Saclay, November 27-29th 2013. OUTLINE. Context ILC/S0 achievements Worldwide R&D activities High gradient R&D activities at CEA/IRFU. CONTEXT. ILC: ~ 16000 Superconductive Niobium cavities > 31.5 MV/m

hubert
Télécharger la présentation

French IRFU Collisioner Days . CEA Saclay, November 27-29th 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. R&D High Gradient Cavities F. Eozenou French IRFU CollisionerDays. CEA Saclay,November 27-29th 2013 High Gradient Cavities, November 28th 2013

  2. OUTLINE • Context • ILC/S0 achievements • Worldwide R&D activities • High gradient R&D activitiesat CEA/IRFU

  3. CONTEXT • ILC: ~16000Superconductive Niobium cavities > 31.5 MV/m = cost driver • Challenging performance • Requires a worldwide effort Horizontal EP set-upat KEK CleanroomAssemblyat CEA/IRFU Requiresperfectknowledge of SRF technologyfromcavity fabrication to cleanroomassembly

  4. BULK Niobium close to itsultimate performances Eacc (MV/m) • Main breakthroughsin the 90’s for performance improvement: • Hydride cure (800°C heating) • Cleaning (High Pressure Rinsing) • Baking (120°C) • Electropolishing

  5. ILC Standard RECIPE EP and Bakingset-up @ KEK • Light chemical etching (10µm) • Heavy electropolishing (EP) (100-120µm) ~ 7h • Cleaning • 800°C x 2h degassing • Tuning • Light EP (25µm) ~ 1h30 • Cleaning • High Pressure Rinsing (HPR) (2x6h) • Cleanroom assembly • HV Baking 120°Cx48h • = Time Consuming HPR= UP water sprayedat100 bars for cleaning Nb Polishing: Removing of the damaged layer/surface smoothening Cleaning: Removing of chemicalresiduals Baking: Degassing of niobium, Q0 cure, higher gradients

  6. FOCUS ON ELECTROPOLISHING PROCESS Process • Nb polishedinternallywith an electrolyte • (concentrated H2SO4 - HF mixture) under constant voltage • Cavity = Anode & Cathode is an Al pipe inside the cavity Chemicalreactions • - Anode: Niobium oxidation • 2 Nb + 5 H2O  Nb2O5 + 10 H+ + 10 e- • - Cathode: H2generation • 2 H+ + 2 e- H2 (Teflon net to prevent H contamination) • - HF: dissolution of oxide Nb2O5 layer • - H2SO4: forming of a viscous layer Rawmaterial EP’ed 100 µm Obtention of lawroughness 0.1µm

  7. Details OF NB ELECTROPOLISHING Acid mixture Aluminum Cathode H2 Rotatingcavity = Anode - SO42- S Al 3+ H+ Nb5+ + Titre | Date

  8. OBJECTIVE OF THE R&D (I) • Improve the yield of the cavity gradient: Goal of S0 program: reaching 90% yieldabove 35MV/m a) After 1stpass b) After 2d pass* *2d pass = Re-EP or Re-HPR From ILC TDR report • 75% (±11%) above 35MV/m and 94% (±6%) above 28MV/m in 2010-2012. • developmentof repairing techniques, inspection of cavities, etc.

  9. TECHNICAL DeVELOPMENTS DURING S0 program Scratches on iris After grinding Repairing technique: Local grinding by KEK Improved inspection techniques: OBACHT (Desy) and Kyoto Camera (Kyoto U./KEK) Temperaturemappingsystems, measurements by 2dsound, etc.

  10. OBJECTIVE OF THE R&D (II) • Transfer of the technology to industry for large scale production. • Paramount importance of the cavity production for the XFEL linac: • Similarcavity vs. ILC • Similartreatmentrecipe • Large scale production (800 cavities, ILC/20) ChemicaltreatmentatZanon D. Reschke, THIA01, SRF 2013 79 cavitiesreceivedfrom 2 vendors (RI, Zanon) Average maximum gradient: (30.9 ± 4.9) MV/m after 2d pass.

  11. OBJECTIVE OF THE R&D (III) • Developsimplerprocess • Developsaferprocess (HF-free recipe) • Improve Q0

  12. R&D for SaferProcesses

  13. CAVITY Tumbling (I)aka ‘CentrIfugal Barrel POLISHING’ CBP A.D. Palczewski, TUIOB01,SRF 2013 1-cell CBP at RRCAT 9 mm stone Decreasing abrasive size • The cavityismechanicallypolished • It isfilledwith abrasive components and rotated • Differentsteps are necessarywithdecrease in abrasive size • Mirror-like final surface finishing • Developpedat FNAL, JLAB, KEK, RRCAT, DESY, INFN

  14. CAVITY TUMBLING (II) • Promisingresults on cavity • Smooth surface • Repairing technique • Lowremoval rate • Multi-stepprocess A.D. Palczewski et al., IPAC2012,WEPPC094

  15. HF-Free RECIPE:Bi-POLAR ELECTROPOLISHING A. Rowe, SRF 2013, TUIOC02 • EP in diluted H2SO4electrolyte • Non-constant voltage: reverse pulse for de-passivation • Collaboration FERMILAB-Faraday Technology INC. • Promisingresults on cavities but lowremoval rate: 1.5µm/hr

  16. HF-free RECIPE: EP WITH IONIC LIQUID @ INFN V.B. Pastushenko, SRF 2013, TUIOC03 • The recipe has been optimized for samples • Improvements for cavitytreatment • High temperaturetreatment 6GHz cavityaftertreatment in vertical position 6GHz half-cavityaftertreatment in horizontal position

  17. DecreasingProcessing Time

  18. REDUCTION OF BAKING TIME FastBaking technique developpedat CEA Saclay: Bakingunder Argon athigher T: 3h baking. B. Visentin, SRF 2007, TUP69, pp. 304-307

  19. ALTERNATIVE ELECTROLYTE • Buffered EP developpedat J-Lab and PKU: • Mixture of Lactic-HF-Sulfuricacids • Verylowroughnessachieved • Very high removal rate: up to 10 µm/min Cathodes testedat J-Labduring BEP studies EP BEP

  20. High Q0Research

  21. SEEK FOR HIGHER Q0 (See SRF 2013) • Doping withimpurities as N • A. Grasselino, TUIOA03 • Treatment of external surface of the cavity • V. Palmieri, MOIOCO1 • Optimization of cooling • J.M. Vogt, TUIOA02 • Deposition techniques: Nb3Sn • M. Lieppe, S. Posen, WEIOA04

  22. Vertical Electropolishing (VEP)

  23. MAIN VEP faciLITIES IN THE WORLD CERN CEA/IRFU Cornell F. Furuta, IPAC 2012, TUPPR045 & SRF 2013, TUIOC01 F. Eozenou et al. PRST-AB, 15, 083501 (2012) & SRF 2013, TUP046 S. Calatroni et al. LINAC 2010, THP032, pp 824-826 & SRF 2013, TUP047

  24. VERTICAL ELECTROPOLISHING F. Furuta, IPAC 2012, TUPPR045 • High gradient demonstratedatCornell but: • Final VEP removalshouldbethin to avoiddecrease in Eacc • → Proposalat CEA Saclay IRFU for a set-upwithcirculatingacid

  25. Horizontal vs Vertical • Pros: • Good evacuation of gases (cavityhalffilled) • Demonstratedefficiency • Large range of parameters • Pros: • Simple process • Lowfloor surface • Improvedsafety • Higherremoval rate • Cons: • Complicatedprocess • Rotary seals • Switching of the cavity • Lowremoval rate • Cons: • Sensitive to fluiddynamics • Properparameters to bedetermined… …Voltage and fluidvelocity

  26. HIGH GRADIENT ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

  27. JAPAN-France TYL COLLABORATION (previously LIA) 2007-… • Previous collaboration within A_RD_5 program: Surface treatment • New equipmentsat KEK & Irfu • Extension of our expertise fromcavity fabrication to Vertical Test • Involvement of industrialpartners • → A_RD_9: Effort towards improving large scale production of SC cavities • Collaboration KEK – CEA and industrial partner: Marui Galvanizing Co. Ltd. Since 2012, additionnal collaboration KEK-IRFU: A_RD_7: Study on the magneticsghielding for SC cavities(M. Mazusawa, J. Plouin)

  28. Fluid velocity [HF] at 4 000 s [HF] at 20 000 s ACHIEVEMENTS WITHIN A_RD_5 (I) • Improvement of cleaningrecipes, ie: • Spongecleaning technique • Improvement of rinsingafterEP • Modelling of EP, understanding of fieldflatnessdeteriorationafter EP • Modellingwith COMSOL: • Fluiddynamic • Acid concentration EP shouldbeconsidered as an asymetricprocess

  29. ACHIEVEMENTS WITHIN A_RD_5 (II) • Study of contamination related to chemicaltreatments: high voltage and high current EP are likely to generatesulfur compounds • Succesfulevaluation of repairing technique such as grinding Sample A, 20 Volts: 9.18g removed 51 hours EP Sample B, 5 Volts: 9.11g removed 115 hours EP Example of XPS Analysisat KEK

  30. ELECTROPOLISHING AT IRFU: 2004-2013 • EP on samples (CARE program): 2004-… • Parametersoptimization • Understanding of the process (F- diffusion) • Study of the aging of electrolytes • Sulfur contamination • 1-Cell Horizontal EP: 2006-2009 • Achievement of high gradients • Alternative recipetested • Achievement of high Q0 • Low voltage EP • Design of a new VEP system: 2009-… • Operating since 2011 • Optimization on 1-Cell cavities • Operationwith ILC and SPL cavities

  31. VEP AT CEA SACLAY TB9RI025 cavity Prior to VEP • Circulatingacid • Constant voltage • Nitrogenblowing • VEP of 1-Cell and 9-Cell cavities • Focus on parameters: low voltage (~ 6V) – high acid flow (25L/min) • Improveddegassing (H2 , O2) • Lowerheating • Four 1-Cell cavities and one 9-cell cavityprepared by VEP

  32. Low Voltage VEP: 1st Result VEP of cavitywithlow surface quality (pits) • Better surface achieved • Pitspartiallyremoved • In spite of pits, the cavityistested → Quenchat 34MV/m at the pit area (Standard Q-Slopebeforebaking)

  33. VEP ExPERIMENTS COMBINED WITHRESEARCH OF QUENCH BY 2d sound Monocellcavity 1,3 GHz 4 OSTs are placedaround the cavity, in the equator plane Presented by J. Plouin at TTC 2012, JLab. OSTs → Study of the quenchmorphology by replica technique. S. Berry et al. SRF 2003, THP04, 591-595 Temperaturemapping → Quenchlocated at the pit area

  34. Eacc > 41 MV/m on 1Cell Cavity with Parameters: Low Voltage – High Acid Flow • 1DE1: Horizontal EP + 70 µm VEP • Parameters: 6V & >24L/min • Bright and smooth surface • Performance before/afterbakingsimilar to HEP • High gradient maintainedafter VEP 1DE1 after HEP + 70 µm VEP • Aspects to improve: • Lowremoval rate at 19°C: 0.2µm/min • asymmetry: removal rate higher in the upper part of the cell (x 3) higher local removal Acid flow

  35. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL BY MARUI Co Ltd Use of a cathode with a specificshape: i-Ninja® cathode SRF 2013, TUP052 • Rotating Cathode withretractablewings • Uniform anode-cathode distance • Betterhydrogenremoval • 1-Cell cavity exchange programmwithin TYL. Improvedfluid distribution withunfolded cathode.

  36. RESULTS ON 9-CELL ILC CAVITY At IRFU RF results for ILC TB9R1025 cavity at 1.6 - 1.9K after HEP + 50µm VEP at 6V. • Resultslimited by fieldemission • New cleanroom in construction willmake possible a betterassembly of the cavity

  37. OUTLOOK • Recentresult: Q0 2E11 after VEP on 1-Cell cavity (withoutbaking) • → Experiments on 1-Cell cavities to becontinued • Full treatment of 9-Cell cavitiesfrom

  38. CONCLUSION • Technicalmaturity: Results close to ultimate performance • Improvement of the yieldduring ILC TDP phase • Technologysuccesfullyapplied in XFEL project • R&D isgoing on • Simplerprocess • Costreduction • Saferprocess • Higher Q0 • Vertical ElectropolishingdevelopedatCEA/IRFU

  39. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

More Related