1 / 16

Robot, Task. Task, Robot.

Robot, Task. Task, Robot. The morally dubious exploitation of the new slave race. Robot, Game. Game, Robot. Welcoming our creations into the playful embrace of human culture. Why Tasks are Good. General-purpose perception, action = can of worms

huela
Télécharger la présentation

Robot, Task. Task, Robot.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Robot, Task. Task, Robot. The morally dubious exploitation of the new slave race

  2. Robot, Game. Game, Robot. Welcoming our creations into the playful embrace of human culture

  3. Why Tasks are Good • General-purpose perception, action = can of worms • Nasty, icky, intractably wriggly worms • Task-specific perception, action =tractable! • So generalize by parameterizing across tasks

  4. Task-Parameterized Perception

  5. Social-Pragmatic Approach • Tomasello – Language is how we invite others to experience the world in a particular way • My plan – to implement tasking this way • For each task, we communicate how to carve up world into actions, objects, properties • Given that, robot can perceive, act, decode references, leap tall buildings

  6. Thrun’s CES Language • Leave “gaps” in control program • Completed later from labeled training sets • Example – mapping sonar+odometry to angle • Example – recognizing left hand, right hand • Process can iterate during code development • My plan – leave larger gaps; scriptable interface

  7. Scripting Analogy • Expose interfaces for physical references, sequences Robot exposes interfaces Coder tailors to own nefarious purposes

  8. Referential Indeterminacy “GAVAGAI” Whole object assumption Taxonomic assumption Mutual exclusivity Gaze direction (Quine: Word and Object, 1960)

  9. “Let’s go find the toma!” (Tomasello: Pragmatics of Word Learning, 1997)

  10. Automata learning Sequencing protocol Physical reference protocol Supervised learning

  11. Physical Reference Protocol • Refer to features by manipulating them • Show extremes, alternate, synchronize • Lies on continuum with sequencing protocol • Cache features by associating labels

  12. Sequencing Protocol • Verbal • Fast vocabulary extension • Offline discovery of filler, language model • Small hardwired grammar • Hardwired error correcting protocol

  13. Run recognizer Extract OOV fragments Identify rarely-used additions Identify competition Add to lexicon Remove from lexicon Update lexicon, baseforms Hypothesized transcript N-Best hypotheses Update Language Model

  14. Ow! Basic Object Competence • Visual segmentation is major source of confusion • Use the “Confuse THIS!” strategy :-

  15. Active Segmentation • Unsure where the boundaries of an object lie? • Poke it gently • Thump it savagely • Try to put your flipper beside it • Try to put your flipper behind it • Displace your head • Get human to present it

  16. Conclusions • Target demonstrations • Can’t do porter, so do sorter • Incremental role transfer • Comprehension of search • Component technologies • Functional autonomy?

More Related