1 / 35

Frank Clemente Ph.D. Professor of Social Science Penn State University

Shale Gas: Environmental reality is a rapidly growing shadow. “there is virtually no federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing…” Henry Waxman and Edward Markey, U.S. Congress, 2010 (1). Frank Clemente Ph.D. Professor of Social Science Penn State University. 1.

hung
Télécharger la présentation

Frank Clemente Ph.D. Professor of Social Science Penn State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shale Gas: Environmental reality is a rapidly growing shadow “there is virtually no federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing…” Henry Waxman and Edward Markey, U.S. Congress, 2010 (1) Frank Clemente Ph.D. Professor of Social Science Penn State University 1 Note: This work is solely the responsibility of the author and presented totally independent from Pennsylvania State University

  2. Why Shale Gas Production Will Not Meet Expectations: • Methane releases from gas production invalidate the argument that “gas is 50% cleaner than coal”. Methane is 72-times more powerful than CO2 over any 20 year period—the correct time frame for shale gas development and production. (9 ,19) • Hydraulic fracturing has impacts on clean water supply and creates a stream of hazardous liquid and solid waste that requires disposal • Drilling will be restricted in the watershed of major cities—e.g. New York and Philadelphia--areas geographically isomorphic to major shale gas reserves. • Constraints on hydraulic fracturing on federal lands including the national forests –also areas geographically isomorphic to shale gas reserves • A 70% first year decline rate creates a never-ending treadmill of drilling that results in the “industrialization “ of rural areas---which are starting to rebel • Hydraulic fracturing is likely to soon be subject to the Safe Drinking Water Act –significantly raising the cost of production as well as reducing areas to drill 2

  3. Say What ? “the companies (used) other chemicals in their fracturing fluids– such as benzene, toluene…and xylenes,” Henry Waxman and Edward Markey, U.S. Congress, 2010 (1) “Benzene and toluene are not used in fracturing operations” Independent Oil and Gas Association of NY (23) ? “State regulators and community groups have linked shale gas hydraulic fracturing operations to water contamination in many states, and reports of contamination are increasing” Sierra Club testimony, 2010 (15) ? “Industry has proven it can develop shale plays safely” Natural Gas Supply Association (13)

  4. Catskill/Delaware Watersheds “Based on the latest science and available technology horizontal drilling/high-volume hydraulic fracturing pose an unacceptable threat to the NYC water supply and cannot safely be permitted within the NYC watershed” Department of Environmental Protection—NYC, 2010 (20) 4

  5. Why New York State Placed a Moratorium on Shale Gas Drilling “Every activity in natural-gas drilling poses a risk to the water supply” Paul Rush, New York City Deputy Commissioner of Water Supply (2) "Benzene is a high-risk carcinogen and was found in nearly half of all flowback waters ...(at) nearly 100 times the maximum contaminant level (5 μg/L) established by the EPA” NY State Water Resources Institute (38) “the risk to clean, fresh water from gas hydrofracing in the New York City watershed is widely acknowledged, but the rest of New York is similarly at risk and deserves equal protection… the ability to drink the water from a private well or irrigate farmland may be taken for granted until it’s gone” Sierra Club, Atlantic Chapter (3) 5

  6. "Industrialization" of rural New York The multiplicative difference between one well and the eventual build out (20) One well becomes 6,000 160 tons of chemicals expands to one million tons of chemicals 1,200 truck trips escalates to 7,200,000 truck trips

  7. Department of Environmental Protection– NYC: Shale gas, industrial waste and the watershed (20) “Because of the vast volumes of water utilized in hydraulic fracturing, 1 percent concentration of chemical additives to the fracking fluids results in 160 tons of “chemistry” [per well] ; some of it benign, some of it hazardous, and much of it unknown and undisclosed” “hydrofracturing and gas well operations will produce an industrial-strength waste stream” “Disposal options are further complicated by elevated levels of radioactivity in the wastewater” “Cumulatively, hundreds of tons per day of fracturing chemicals into the watershed over a period of several decades is unacceptable for a public water supply” 7

  8. We need improved monitoring of methane releases from gas production Methane Emissions from Gas and Oil Systems are greatly under reported by inspectors due to lack of infra-red equipment Naked eye Infra-red (42) • Methane is such a powerful GHG that it “is responsible for 75% as much warming as carbon dioxide measured over any given 20 years” (19) • Natural gas is the source of 60% of all energy related methane emissions (coal = 28%) (30) • Regulatory agencies are woefully behind the technological curve. New infrared cameras to find methane emissions cost$106,200 each. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has two such cameras to inspect over 85,000 wells plus an extensive infrastructure ranging from pipelines to compressors to storage facilities.(47) 8

  9. Shale gas is not 50% cleaner than coal: Methane Emissions from Shale Gas Cannot Continue to Be Ignored (9) From Cornell University, April, 2009: • “Natural gas is being widely advertised and promoted as a clean burning fuel that produces less greenhouse gas emissions than coal …society should be wary of claims that natural gas is a desirable fuel in terms of the consequences on global warming” • “comparing the total emissions of greenhouse gas emissions from (hydraulic fractured) natural gas suggests that they are 2.4-fold greater than are the emissions just from the combustion of the natural gas” • “The leakage of methane gas during production, transport, processing, and use of natural gas is probably a far more important consideration.. Since methane is such a powerful greenhouse gas…even small leakages of natural gas to the atmosphere have very large consequences on global warming” • “total emissions from coal are probably quite similar to those for natural gas obtained from shale formations such as the Marcellus Shale” Robert W. Howarth Atkinson Professor of Ecology & Environmental Biology, Cornell University

  10. Water and Shale Gas 10 BRINE PIT (37)

  11. Water Footprint of Shale Gas “…the Marcellus water is the worst water on the planet" Mark Wilson, GE Water Technologies (40) Benzene, a known carcinogen, was found in 14 of 29 wells tested in WV and PA (38) Up to 7 million gallons of water per well (24) 320,000 pounds of chemicals per well (20) Toxins such as hydrogen sulfide leached from bedrock (44) Only about 30-50% of the fracking water is typically recovered (7,48) Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) leached from bedrock (24) 11

  12. Why is shale gas drilling exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act ? FrackingFluids Regulatory Lag with 10,000s of wells planned “studies on chemicals in frack fluids in Colorado indicate 43% may be Endocrine Disrupting Compounds or have EDC potential ” National Park Service (6) Formaldehyde, Hydrochloric Acid, Ethane, Methanol and over 100 other chemicals known and unknown “The Energy Policy Act of 2005 exempts companies from being (required) to reveal what chemicals are in their fracturing fluids” The Christian Science Monitor (8) “It is much like asking Coca-Cola to disclose the formula of Coke” Ron Heyden , Halliburton (22) “If you buy a can of Coke, you get to see what the ingredients are” Amy Mall, NRDC (21) 160 tons per well (20)

  13. Clean Air and Shale Gas (39) These air pollutants may be released from natural gas flares: benzene, formaldehyde, naphthalene), acetaldehyde, acrolein, propylene, toluene, xylene, ethyl benzene and hexane (16) 13

  14. What 80% Reduction Requires “Gas doesn't get us there” Dave Hamilton, Director for Global Warming, Sierra Club (35) 14 14

  15. Land and Shale Gas: 6,000 of these in New York alone? (20) 15

  16. Hickory, PA (37) 16

  17. A Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulation on a Marcellus Shale Gas Well (5) 17

  18. The Shale Gas Drilling Treadmill Shale gas wells decline more than 70% in the first year A perpetual treadmill of wells, rigs, trucks and pipelines—going on for decades “Devon has drilled 4,000 wells in the Barnett and is planning 4,000 more, at least” Devon Energy (18) “Marcellus shale.. will require drilling tens of thousands of wells” The Wall Street Journal (11) “The gas industry has not been gentle on Western landscapes …to displace coal with gas we’d need to complete 30,000 to 40,000 new wells a year for decades to come” Randy Udall, The Salt Lake Tribune(17) 18

  19. 40 Acres and a Drill What a gas drilling treadmill really means (40) 19

  20. Imagine the Environmental Impact Gas industry’s claim The Scale The Impact "... U.S. natural gas producers can increase supplies by 5% per year for at least the next decade” Testimony of Aubrey McClendon, Chesapeake Energy before House Select Committee (31) What 5% annual growth over a decade would really mean: • Twice the production of Texas • Four Gulfs of Mexico • 10 Louisianas • Eight Alaskan pipelines • A never-ending treadmill of tens of thousands of wells with a 70% first-year decline rate • Environmental impacts of untold magnitude on water, air, land and society + = 20

  21. 21 (45)

  22. A Disconnect (4) “Carl Pope, the Sierra Club's executive director, has traveled the country promoting natural gas's environmental benefits, sometimes alongside Aubrey McClendon, chief executive of Chesapeake Energy Corp., one of the biggest U.S. gas companies by production” WSJ, 2009 “Will the 20% of the membership that happens to live in places where drilling is happening be unhappy? I’m sure that’s true” Carl Pope, Sierra Club, WSJ, 2009 22

  23. What will happen when shale gas does not show up as predicted? Unfulfilled optimism is common in the gas industry: In 1998, the American Gas Association predicted U.S. production would exceed 25 TCF in 2010. The EIA now estimates that 2010 production will only be 20 TCF -- a difference of three Oklahomas (46, 26)

  24. Our Staggering Bet on Shale Gas as the Source of New Supply (26) New supply from: 24 24

  25. If Shale Gas Production Does Not Deliver (26) By 2020 LNG imports from foreign nations would exceed the production of the Gulf of Mexico plusOklahoma 25

  26. The Globalization of Natural Gas Prices:LNG prices will be linked to oil prices over coming decades Our [LNG] projects are long term [and] linked to oil prices… in the coming two or three years there will be a shortage of gas” Qatari Minister of Energy, 2010 (36) 26 (47)

  27. A Five Nation Cartel Would Control Almost 60% of the World’s Natural Gas (41) "We are creating something similar to OPEC but with gas" Hugo Chavez on the formation of a gas cartel (2009) (32) 27

  28. Place Your Bet U.S. Natural Gas Production by 2020 34 Tcf 20 Tcf 17 Tcf If Chesapeake is Correct If EIA is Correct If no Incremental Shale Gas ? But don’t go too far out on the Chesapeake Transition Bridge (14) Business News Network (April, 2010): “Chesapeake Energy Turns Tail on Natural Gas---the nation’s second-largest natural gas producer, plans to shift more of its 2010 capital spend towards oil exploration...The economics just compel you to look for oil rather than natural gas right now,” Aubrey McClendon

  29. National Academy of Sciences We have been warned by the best scientists in the nation • “Electricity use and gross national product [are] strongly correlated. The relationship … is so important that it should be considered in developing … energy and economic policies (to ) lower the real cost of electricity supply.” (27) • “The results for electricity from natural gas strengthened this conclusion: … [gas] can be one of the lowest cost – or one of the highest cost - sources of electricity." (28) • “Natural gas generation of electricity could be expanded to meet a substantial portion of U.S. electricity demand--if there were no concerns about the behavior of world natural gas markets and prices and about further increasing CO2 emissions and U.S. import dependence." (28) 29

  30. The Seductive Lure of Windfall Revenues Marcellus cash “has become the crack cocaine of state government…. The state forest has been used to balance the state budget two years in a row…..We will see a degradation of Penn’s Woods the likes of which is unprecedented in the history of the state” John Quigley, Secretary of PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (10) “Without required environmental research and regulatory oversight, Pennsylvania would be making the same choice made in the natural gas booms of the past -- leave the environmental damages created by the current boom to the next generation to remedy” Joel Tarr, Professor of Environmental History, Carnegie Mellon University (25)

  31. Nightfall (39) 31

  32. Endnotes for References 1. Chairman Henry Waxman and Subcommittee Chairman Edward Markey, Feb. 18, 2010, Re: Examining the Potential Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing, U.S. House of Representatives: Committee on Energy and Commerce, available from http://www.ngsa.org/newsletter/pdfs/22%20-%20Natural%20Gas%20from%20Shale%20to%20Double%20w%20graphic.pdf 2. Allen Amateau, Nov. 3, 2009, “More water worries over state’s drilling safeguards,” The Villager, available from http://www.thevillager.com/villager_339/morewaterworries.html 3. J. Helm , Jan. 7, 2010, in “DEC's Marcellus Shale Gas Mining SGEIS ‘Deeply Flawed’ NY officials, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, environmental groups tell Governor Paterson,” PR LEAP, available from http://www.prleap.com/pr/145846/ 4. Ben Casselman, Dec. 22, 2009, “Sierra Club’s Pro-Gas Dilemma,” The Wall Street Journal, page A6 5. David Soeder and William Kappel, May 21, 2009, “Water Resources and Natural Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale,” U.S. Geological Survey, available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3032/ 6. Rick Harris, Dec. 31, 2009, Re: Comments on the Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Regulatory Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, available from http://www.riverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/NPS-Comments-on-NYSDEC-dSGEIS-12-31-09.pdf 7. Christina Callicott, Nov. 23, 2007, Halliburton talks frac'ing with BLM" Telluride Watch, CO 8. Mark Clayton, Sept. 17, 2008, “Controversial path to possible glut of natural gas,” The Christian Science Monitor, available from http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Living-Green/2008/0917/controversial-path-to-possible-glut-of-natural-gas 9. Robert Howarth, April 1, 2010, “Preliminary Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas obtained by Hydraulic Fracturing,” Cornell University, available from http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/energy/files/39646/GHG.emissions.from.Marcellus.Shale.April12010%20draft.pdf 10. Donald Gilliland, April 21, 2010, “State DCNR chief wants Marcellus monitoring,” The Patriot-News (Harrisburg), available from

  33. Endnotes for References 11. Ben Casselman, Aug. 11, 2008, “Natural-Gas Firms Seek Outlet for Growing Supplies, The Wall Street Journal, available from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121841402609028471.html 12. Rigzone, March 16, 2009, “Mainland Resources Reports on Gas Flow for Haynesville Shale Well, Rigzone, available from http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=74036 13. Natural Gas Supply Association, Oct. 8, 2008, “Natural Gas from Shale Could Double in Next Ten Years,” available from http://www.ngsa.org/newsletter/pdfs/22%20-%20Natural%20Gas%20from%20Shale%20to%20Double%20w%20graphic.pdf 14. David Phillips, April 6, 2010, “Chesapeake Energy Turns on Natural Gas, Looks for Oil Instead,” BNet, available from http://industry.bnet.com/energy/10003815/chesapeake-energy-lookin-for-oil-that-is-black-gold-texas-tea/ 15. Craig Holt Segall, April 7, 2010, “Oral Comments of the Sierra Club,” EPA Science Advisory Board Meeting on Hydraulic Fracturing, available from http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/012848841789D4F8852576FC0078969D/$File/Oral+Statement+by+C+Segall+for+Sierra+Club-4-5-10+for+EEC+Apr+7-8+2010+Meeting.pdf 16. Ventura County Air Pollution control District "Gas Flaring" Ventura CA www.vcapcd.org 17. Randy Udall, Aug. 18, 2009, “Can natural gas save the world? Well, it’s better than coal,” The Salt Lake Tribune, available at http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_13152405 18. Steven Mufson, Dec. 3, 2009, “An energy answer in the shale below?” The Washington Post, available from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120204305.html 19. Robert Watson and Mohamed El-Ashry, Dec. 28, 2009, “A Fast, Cheap Way to Cool the Planet,” The Wall Street Journal, available from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704039704574616130812043404.html 20. NYC Department of Environmental Protection, March 9, 2010, “Impact Assessment of Natural Gas Production in the New York City Water Supply Watershed" http://csis.org/files/attachments/100309_PRush_NYDEP.pdf

  34. Endnotes for References 21. David Williams, Sept. 18, 2009, “Wyo. fracking contamination case eerily similar to Colorado’s Divide Creek accident,” The Colorado Independent, available from http://coloradoindependent.com/tag/wyoming 22. “House Bill Eyes Shale Gas Drilling,” The Observer, available from http://www.wvobserver.com/2010/03/house-bill-eyes-shale-gas-drilling/ 23. Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York, “Get The Facts on Hydraulic Fracturing,” Marcellus Facts, available from http://www.marcellusfacts.com/pdf/HydraulicFracturingQ&A.pdf 24. Susan Riha, Feb. 22, 2010, “Natural Gas Drilling: Potential Environmental and Community Impacts,” Cornell University, presented for the New York State Water Resources Institute 25. Joel Tarr, Aug. 2, 2009, “The Next Page: There Will Be Gas,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, available from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09214/987834-109.stm 26. Energy Information Administration, Dec. 2010, Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Early Release Overview, U.S. Department of Energy, available from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html 27. Committee on Electricity in Economic Growth, Electricity in Economic Growth, National Academy Press: Washington D.C., 1986 28. The National Academies, America’s Energy Future: Technology and Transformation, The National Academies Press: Washington D.C., 2009 29. Robert Casey Jr., June 9, 2009, “Casey, House Members Introduce Companion Bills to Protect Drinking Water from Natural Gas Fracking,” Robert P. Casey Jr. U.S. Senator for Pennsylvania, available from http://casey.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=3d78271c-e412-4b63-95b8-419e75ce2bb6 30. Energy Information Administration, Dec. 8, 2009, “Emissions of Greenhouse Gases Report: Methane Emissions,” U.S. Department of Energy, available from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/methane.html#total

  35. Endnotes for References 31. Aubrey McClendon, July 30, 2008, “Written Testimony of Aubrey K. McClendon,” U.S. House of Representatives: The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, available from http://www.globalwarming.house.gov/tools/2q08materials/files/0125.pdf 32. Kiraz Janicke, Sept. 9, 2009, “Venezuela’s Chavez Promotes Organisation of Gas Exporting Countries during Tour,” Venezuela Analysis, available from http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/4784 33. BP, “Responsible Development,” available from http://www.bp.com/bodycopyarticle.do?categoryId=1&contentId=7052055 34. National Energy Technology Laboratory, available from http://www.netl.doe.gov/ 35. Steve Hargreaves, March 29, 2010, “Natural Gas: Fuel of the future,” CNN Money, available from http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/29/news/economy/natural_gas/index.htm 36. Reuters, March 25, 2010, “Qatar doesn’t plan to cut gas output to buoy price-,” available from http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/29/news/economy/natural_gas/index.htm 37. http://www.donnan.com/Marcellus-Gas_Hickory.htm 38. New York Water Resources Institute, 2010, “The Marcellus shale and natural gas” Cornell University 39. http://www.marcellus-shale.us/gas_flares.htm 40. The Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, “Responsible Growth: Protecting the Public Interest with a Natural Gas Severance Tax,” available from http://www.pennbpc.org/severance-tax 41. BP, June 2009, BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2009, London, UK 42. Andrew Revkin and Clifford Krauss, Oct. 14, 2009, “By Degrees: Curbing Emissions by Sealing Gas Leaks,” The New York Times, available from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/business/energy-environment/15degrees.html 43. David Hill, Tracy Lombardi, and John Martin, 2004, “Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York,” Northeastern Geology And Environmental Sciences, Vol. 26 44. Lisa Sumi, May 2008, “Shale Gas: Focus on the Marcellus Shale,” Earthworks, available from http://www.earthworksaction.org/pubs/OGAPMarcellusShaleReport-6-12-08.pdf 45. http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/2010/02/18/goldilocks-and-the-three-fuels/ 46. See Gas Daily, July 2, 1998 and aga.org/stats Studies, 1998 47. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/yahoolatestnews/stories/041110dnmetbarnettshale.4044fed.html 48. US Department of Energy, Modern Shale Gas , Office of Fossil Fuel, April 2009

More Related