1 / 14

WP6: Delivery and evaluation of learning environment and training programme

WP6: Delivery and evaluation of learning environment and training programme. WP6 Objectives. To adapt the platform, tools and learning programmes to the scenarios in the school pilot sites and the teacher networks To carry out an evaluation of their utilisation, results and outcomes

huslu
Télécharger la présentation

WP6: Delivery and evaluation of learning environment and training programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP6: Delivery and evaluation of learning environment and training programme Dublin, June 2013

  2. WP6 Objectives • To adapt the platform, tools and learning programmes to the scenarios in the school pilot sites and the teacher networks • To carry out an evaluation of their utilisation, results and outcomes • To feedback the evaluation results into further development of the final project outputs Dublin, June 2013

  3. WP6 Activities • WA6.1: installing and adapting the tools and learning programme in each site. Access via a dedicated web platform hosted Arcola (CEPCEP; EA; UNIV; TCD; MENON; CONTOUR) • WA6.2: designing the evaluation approach and the methods, tools and instruments for data collection (Arcola). • WA6.3: evaluation of the tools and programme in each pilot site • WA 6.4: Evaluation data analysis and reporting (Arcola) Dublin, June 2013

  4. The Pilot Sites • Schools • UK – Charlton Park Academy, London (CONTOUR) • BE - ? (MENON) • PT - ? (CEPCEP) • EL - ? (EA) • IE - ? (TCD) • Networks • Lithuanian teacher network (UNIV) • EU school heads (ESHA) Dublin, June 2013

  5. Example: Charlton Park Academy • ‘Special Needs’ school, south east London • 3 Learning modules • Module 1: developing emotional intelligence. • Module 2: developing effective governance • Module 3: developing evaluation skills • Primary users – school governors • Governors remotely accessing the platform, social media tools and three learning modules ‘on demand’ (i.e. as and when they have the time) over the duration of work package 6 (i.e. between November 2013 and July 2014) • Governors participating in three ‘Action Learning Sets’ over this period. These are review workshops in which users of the IGUANA system critically review their experiences of using the system. They last about 2 hours each. • Governors participating in the evaluation of the pilot. This will entail completing a survey questionnaire providing their views on whether and how IGUANA works. • Secondary users – small group of teachers – ‘champions’ Dublin, June 2013

  6. Over-arching Evaluation approach Overall Evaluation of IGUANA Dublin, June 2013

  7. Theory of Change “Specification of an explicit theory of how and why a programme or intervention might cause or have caused an effect” IGUANA concept Evaluation Report Theory of Change Logic Model The Conceptual Framework What value and impacts are associated with the intervention logic and conceptual framework How the concept is converted into an intervention logic How the intervention logic is implemented Dublin, June 2013

  8. Logic Model Dublin, June 2013

  9. Context Input Output Outcomes Impact Assessing ‘distance travelled’ in a theory of change The frame-work within which an intervention is located What is invested, e.g. money, skills, people, activities What has been produced Short and medium term results Long- term outcomes Context indicators Resource / input indicators Output indicators Outcome / result indicators Impact indicators ‘Distance travelled’ indicators Dublin, June 2013

  10. Triangulation Dublin, June 2013

  11. The Internal Project Evaluation Dublin, June 2013

  12. Quality System Dublin, June 2013

  13. Quality Control Checklist Dublin, June 2013

  14. Impacts Assessment Methodology Dublin, June 2013

More Related