1 / 13

Methamphetamine Abuse

Methamphetamine Abuse. by Jane Ricard EDD-9200-BS4 35590 Trends and Issues Nova Southeastern University March 21, 2009. Introduction - Methamphetamine Abuse. Destroys the health of users ( Cartier, Greenwell & Prendergast, 2008 )

idalia
Télécharger la présentation

Methamphetamine Abuse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Methamphetamine Abuse by Jane Ricard EDD-9200-BS4 35590 Trends and Issues Nova Southeastern University March 21, 2009

  2. Introduction - Methamphetamine Abuse • Destroys the health of users (Cartier, Greenwell & Prendergast, 2008) • Harms children who live in meth labs (Weisheit, 2008) • Injures first responders to lab accidents (Weisheit, 2008) • Costly to prosecute, imprison, and treat (Morton, 2007) • Creates toxic waste sites from manufacturing byproducts (Weisheit, 2008) • Effective treatment modalities are available (Jett, 2007)

  3. Methamphetamine and Its Effects • Methamphetamine stimulates the central nervous system (Weisheit, 2008; Cartier, Greenwell & Prendergast, 2008) • Used by smoking, eating, snorting, or injecting (Weisheit, 2008) • Physical effect - tooth decay and breakage in users. (Morton, 2007) • Increases alertness and suppresses the appetite(Anonymous, 2006; Weisheit, 2008) • Injection users exposed to HIV (Morton, 2007)

  4. Methamphetamine Users • In 2006 that more than 42 million people used methamphetamines (Messina, et al., 2008) • Used mostly in rural areas and the Western United States (Staton-Tindall, et al., 2008; Brown & Ramirez, 2007; Ward, McDonough, Keeva, Tebo, et al., 2006) • Mostly whites, American Indians, and Hispanics (Brown & Ramirez, 2007; Anonymous, 2007; Weisheit, 2008) • 50% used by women (Messina, et al., 2008)

  5. Contributing Factors to Abuse of Methamphetamines • Physical and sexual abuse affects the development of the brain causing it to react more severely to life stressors (Messina, et al., 2008) • Primary predictor for substance abuse is substance abuse by family members (Messina, et al., 2008)

  6. Manufacturing Methamphetamines and Its Dangers • Mostly in rural areas and western United States Messina, et al., 2008) • Manufactured close to where it is sold (Staton-Tindall, et al., 2008; Brown & Ramirez, 2007; Ward, McDonough, Keeva, Tebo, et al., 2006) • Easier to manufacture than heroin or cocaine (Weisheit, 2008)

  7. Manufacturing Methamphetamines and Its Dangers • Dangerous substances used in manufacturing (Weisheit, 2008) • Anhydrous ammonia • Explosive, burns skinand eyes • Swells throat to cut off breathing • lithium that is removed from batteries • Lye that burns skin • Sodium, magnesium, and potassium metals that can explode with exposure to air or water

  8. Manufacturing Methamphetamines and Its Dangers • Children of manufacturers are injured by chemicals and final product (Weisheit, 2008) • Toxic waste from process is illegally dumped (Weisheit, 2008) • Some states now prosecute parents for child abuse when children are found in meth labs (Weisheit, 2008)

  9. Treatments • In short term incarcerations teeth are treated and offender is educated about proper care (Morton, 2007) • Longer term incarcerations make addiction treatment possible (Anonymous, 2006)

  10. Treatments • 1990 California enacted the Substance Abuse And Crime Prevention Act (Jett, 2007) • Focus on community treatment, not imprisonment (Jett, 2007) • Initial appointments happened that day or evening for workers (Jett, 2007) • Childcare provided when needed (Jett, 2007) • Personalized treatment (Jett, 2007) • 34% completion rate (Jett, 2007)

  11. Treatments • 30 months after offenders had completed their treatment taxpayers had saved $4 for every dollar spent in treatment (Jett, 2007) • Proved that methamphetamine addiction could be treated as well as other abused substances (Jett, 2007)

  12. Treatments • Sober Living Houses successful (Polcin, Henderson, 2008) • Encourage 12-Step program participation (Polcin, Henderson, 2008) • No alcohol or drugs are allowed (Polcin, Henderson, 2008) • Factors for success (Polcin, Henderson, 2008) • Active 12-Step program participation • Less underlying mental illness

  13. Conclusions • Methamphetamine abuse is costly to addicts’ health and to taxpayers’ wallets • Education to prevent first use is important due to its severe addictiveness • Treatment programs based on success in California should be duplicated • It is essential to protect children from exposure to drug addiction and from the dangers of meth labs to prevent future addicts

More Related