1 / 16

Metal carbonyl and related complexes (dative ligands)

Metal carbonyl and related complexes (dative ligands). Textbook H: Chapter 2.1 – 2.2.7 Textbook A: Chapter 7.1 – 7.4. Stable binary carbonyls. Synthesis of metal carbonyl complexes. From CO Directly from reaction with the metal Ligand substitution Reductive carbonylation

ide
Télécharger la présentation

Metal carbonyl and related complexes (dative ligands)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Metal carbonyl and related complexes (dative ligands) Textbook H: Chapter 2.1 – 2.2.7 Textbook A: Chapter 7.1 – 7.4

  2. Stable binary carbonyls

  3. Synthesis of metal carbonyl complexes • From CO • Directly from reaction with the metal • Ligand substitution • Reductive carbonylation • Deinsertion: not very common

  4. Bonding in CO 13C NMR features, d: 180 – 250 ppm

  5. Bonding in CO complexes • Bonding in CO • The transfer of electrons from the lone pair of O to C leads to a C--O+ polarization, which is almost cancelled out by the C+-O- polarization (O electronegativity). • HOMO of CO is the C-lone pair (O orbitals are deeper-lying). • LUMO of CO (p*) is polarized toward C. • CO binds through C • s-bond removes electron density from C. • p-backbond increases electron density both at C and O. • Polarization of CO on binding • C more positive, O more negative • Dependent on the other ligands present • C is more electrophilic when good p acceptors are present or when the complex is cationic (s-bond is enhanced, p-backbond is weakened) • O is more nucleophilic when good p donors are present or when the complex is anionic • Can be followed by IR • The more important the p-backbond contribution, the weaker the C-O bond, the lower the stretching frequency.

  6. Backbonding Experimental support for backdonation: • X-ray: in (C5H5)Mo(CO)3Me, M-C is 2.38 Å, M=C is 1.99 Å (>0.07 Å) • IR, n(CO): • free CO, 2149 cm-1 • H3B-CO, 2178 cm-1 • Cr(CO)6, 2000 cm-1 • V(CO)6-, 1860 cm-1 • Mn(CO)6+, 2090 cm-1 • Cr(tren)(CO)3, 1880 cm-1 (tren = H2NCH2CH2NHCH2CH2NH2)

  7. Binding modes of CO

  8. CO frequency and phosphine ligands p-Acid character: PMe3 ~ P(NR2)3 < PAr3 < P(OMe)3 < (POAr)3 < PCl3 < CO ~ PF3

  9. Phosphine ligands: bonding As the electronegativity of the atom attached to the phosphorus increases, the s* orbital becomes lower in energy and the phosphine is a better p-acceptor.

  10. Monodentate phosphines: cone angles Reference: Tolman, C. A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313

  11. Metal nitrosyl complexes

  12. Nitrosyl (NO) complexes: binding • Two different coordination modes

  13. Molecular Orbital Diagram of NO

  14. Electronic Structure • Non-innocent ligand • M–N–O can range from 120–180° + e– – e– NO NO+ NO– Isoelectronic with O2 Isoelectronic with CO

  15. Bent Linear Binding Modes and IR spectroscopy • Multiple binding modes • Effect on the NO stretching frequency 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 2000 νNO (cm-1)

  16. Enemark and Feltham Notation {M(NO)n}m • m = number of electrons in the metal d orbitals and the π*(NO) orbital Allows to circumvent assigning oxidation states in difficult molecules NO0 = 1 π*(NO) electron Co0 = 9 d electrons {CoNO}10 If considered NO+ the oxidation state is Co( –1)

More Related