1 / 18

The Danish DC-approach to 2 nd Pillar Pensions

The Danish DC-approach to 2 nd Pillar Pensions. Contractual Pensions Seminar Washington DC., 29 April – 3 May 2002 Ole Beier Soerensen, Ph.D., Chief of Analysis, ATP, Denmark OBS@ATP.DK. Pension Reform Objectives. Objective different from that of other countries

ike
Télécharger la présentation

The Danish DC-approach to 2 nd Pillar Pensions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Danish DC-approach to 2nd Pillar Pensions Contractual Pensions Seminar Washington DC., 29 April – 3 May 2002 Ole Beier Soerensen, Ph.D., Chief of Analysis, ATP, Denmark OBS@ATP.DK

  2. Pension Reform Objectives • Objective different from that of other countries • To enhance 2nd pillar coverage • To increase replacement rates for low and mid-income workers • Expansion and completion rather than retrenchment

  3. Process and Results • Three partite agreement – 1987 • Collective agreements 1987 to 1993 • 85% of all employed workers • 9 to 18% of gross wages • ATP turned into a universal, funded 1st pillar DC-scheme • Reform in line with 20th century development

  4. Three Elements of this Presentation • The Danish preference for DC-principles • Some technical properties • Cause for further consideration

  5. Basic - but Trivial - Principles • Core principles: • coverage by external capital settlement • standards applied to life-insurance • assets must match liabilities • subject to supervision by the supervisory agency • current evaluation of an approved actuary • Abolition of book-reserves and internal pension funds • In force for the entire industry since 1936 (1903)

  6. 1936 and onwards • Occupational pensions were rare and mostly DB • Increased coverage during the post-war period • Three main characteristics: • new schemes are DC • DB is replaced by DC • collective insurance principles

  7. Undisputed DC-preference • No debate over the DB/DC choice • Trivial considerations: • capital settlement • vesting periods • portability • distortionary labour market effects • severance payments etc.

  8. Lead Role of the Public Sector • Drive towards DC in the 50'ies and 60'ies • demography and anticipated public sector growth • DB and groups with a high job-mobility • Without an ultimate sponsor of last resort… • … a DC-model was the only alternative • The role model of the following 30 years

  9. From DB to DC in the Private Sector • DB replaced by DC during the 60'ies and 70'ies • high inflation rates • high wage growth rates • increased job-mobility • paternalism dissolved • new hiring preferences • Remaining DB-schemes belong to multinationals

  10. Choice of Model Properties • Two general objectives: • guarantees similar to DB • sharing of social risks and investment risks • Model choice: • collective insurance model • insurance package: old-age, disability and survivors benefits

  11. The Pension Contract • Minimum interest guarantee • Excess return allocated over time as annual increases • Prudency and real-value regulation • The contract: • compulsory membership of designated scheme • the right to insurance benefits covered • the right to accrue on terms given at entry • The annuity is drawn up at entry

  12. The Overall Pension System • Inclusive rather than exclusive • Avoids individualisation of risk • Security, credibility and predictability • Not the intended outcome of pursued strategy

  13. Pension Model in Question – 1 • Increased life-expectancy strengthens demand for reserve funds • Less scope for future value adjustments of promises and pensions

  14. Pension Model in Question - 2 • Lower nominal interest rate questions: • the prudency of interest guarantees • the scope for future value adjustment • Enhancing security and complying with 3rd EU-directive on life-insurance • Lower maximum allowed guaranteed interest rate • "New" and "old" members?

  15. Pension Model in Question – 3 • New regime of accounting principles as of 2002 • Assets and liabilities valued at market value • Absolute solvency on a day-to-day basis

  16. Market Value Interest Rate - 2002

  17. Pension Model in Question – 4 • Co-ordination of public and private pensions • Individuals influence on the investment behaviour of pension funds • individual choice or investment democracy • ethics and the focus on return • Compulsory membership of designated schemes • violation of the consumers free choice? • pre-requisite for collective insurance

  18. Concluding Remark • Technical questions with heavy political implications • Influencing the performance of the overall system • Risk shifting should be carefully considered • There may be no turning back

More Related