1 / 10

Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections

Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections. Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988, as an autonomous agency. Executive Order No 1995-16 transferred the OCC to the Department of Corrections.

inari
Télécharger la présentation

Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Michigan Department of CorrectionsOffice of Community Corrections • Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988, as an autonomous agency. • Executive Order No 1995-16 transferred the OCC to the Department of Corrections. • OCC was originally established as an unit within FOA. • In 2006, as part of the DOC re-organization OCC was placed under the PCDA. • Recently, the Director announced that PDCA will be dissolved and OCC will be aligned within the Executive Bureau.

  2. Public Act 511 of 1988, created State and local partnerships to reduce prison commitments and promote effective jail utilization through comprehensive correctional strategies. Michigan Department of CorrectionsOffice of Community Corrections

  3. State Community Corrections Board Priorities • The State Community Corrections Board adopted priorities to strengthen the focus on State and local community corrections policy, practice and programming. • Reduce prison admissions for: • Straddle Cell Offenders • Probation violators • Emphasis on the use of community-based sanctions and services for straddle cell offenders. • Creative use of jail time in conjunction with other community-based supervision for priority offenders.

  4. Community Corrections ProgramsFY 2010 • Comprehensive Plans and Services • 53 CCABs comprising 74 counties were awarded grants. • Funds were awarded to support nearly 300 local programs and services. • Probation Residential Services • 53 CCABs were allocated residential services in 63 counties. • Drunk Driver Jail Reduction & Community Treatment Program • Grants were awarded to 40 CCABs • Since the inception of the program in January 2004, the number of drunk driver offenders in programs on a monthly average has increased from 285 to 1,301 through September 2009.

  5. Community Corrections Program Options • Work Crews • Risk/Needs Assessments • Educational/Vocational programs with linkages to local school districts, mental health agencies, and Michigan Works! • Outpatient substance abuse counseling • Residential substance abuse treatment • Intensive Supervision • Drug and alcohol testing programs • Electronic Monitoring for misdemeanants • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy • Mental health services • Pretrial screening and supervision

  6. Community Corrections Program Utilization • In FY 2009, there were 43,091 offenders enrolled into community corrections funded programs. • 27,228 Felons (Discharged: 85.5% Successful) • 15,863 Misdemeanants (Discharged: 85.5% Successful)

  7. Impact on Prison Commitments • MDOC Statistical Reports indicate that in 1989 the prison commitment rate (PCR) was 34.7% (11,825 offenders) and decreased to 25% in the mid 1990’s and remained relatively stable through 2003. • During 2003, the Department placed renewed emphasis on the use of community corrections sanctions/services for specific offender populations. As a result, the rate steadily declined to 20.6% through FY 2005. • In FY 2006 the rate climbed back to 21.7% as a result of some highly publicized crimes earlier in the year. In the past few years the rated has steadily declined - 18.8% through FY 2009. • If the PCR in 2009 was similar to the 1989 PCR (34.7%), MDOC would have had incarcerated nearly 9,000 more offenders at a cost of well over $250 million.

  8. Community Corrections Advisory Boards Community Corrections Advisory Boards • CCABs: Members appointed by the County Commission. • One member shall be either a circuit court probation agent or a district court probation officer • CCAB Managers: County or contractual employees which may be part-time or full-time. • CCAB is responsible for developing a comprehensive plan and application that will support local and state objectives. • County Board of Commissioners shall approve the proposed plan prepared by the CCAB

  9. Community Corrections Advisory Boards OCC Coordinator’s Role in Community Corrections • Review annual applications and develop proposals for the State Community Corrections Board. • Technical Assistance • Assist counties in creating new CCABs • Data analysis • Assist CCABs in establishing obtaining objectives • Program review • Specialty Areas:Cognitive Behavioral Treatment • Training in evidenced-based practices

  10. Community Corrections Advisory Boards Updates in Community Corrections Residential Services Centralized • Direct contracts with providers • Decreased Lapsed fund 5.8% FY 2008 to 3.8% FY 2009 • Monthly Utilization Reports • MDOC Website • OMNI Felony Disposition Data • Jail Data • State Community Correction Board Meeting Minutes • Legislative Reports • Web Based COMPAS Case Manager • OMNI Export • Program enrollment • Felony Disposition Data

More Related