1 / 26

Nano Mechanics and Materials: Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications

Nano Mechanics and Materials: Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications. by Wing Kam Liu, Eduard G. Karpov, Harold S. Park. 7. Bridging Scale Numerical Examples. 7.1 Comments on Time History Kernel. 1D harmonic lattice

ingrid
Télécharger la présentation

Nano Mechanics and Materials: Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nano Mechanics and Materials:Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications by Wing Kam Liu, Eduard G. Karpov, Harold S. Park

  2. 7. Bridging Scale Numerical Examples

  3. 7.1 Comments on Time History Kernel • 1D harmonic lattice where indicates a second order Bessel function, is the spring stiffness, and the frequency , where m is the atomic mass • Spring stiffness utilizing LJ 6-12 potential where k is evaluated about the equilibrium lattice separation distance

  4. Truncation Time History Kernel • Impedance force due to salient feature of , an approximation can be made by setting the later components to zero • Plots of time history kernel (truncated) • Plots of time history kernel (full)

  5. Comparison between time history integrals (full and truncated) • Plot of time history kernel (full and truncated)

  6. 7.2 1D Bridging Scale Numerical Examples – Lennard-Jones • MD impedance force (applied correctly) • Initial MD & FEM displacements • MD impedance force (not applied correctly)

  7. 1D Wave Propagation • 111 atoms in bridging scale MD system • 40 finite elements • 10 atoms per finite element • tfe = 50tmd • Lennard-Jones 6-12 potential • Initial MD & FEM displacements

  8. 1D Wave Propagation - Energy Transfer • 99.97% of total energy transferred from MD domain • Only 9.4% of total energy transferred without impedance force

  9. 7.3 2D/3D Bridging Scale Numerical Examples • Lennard-Jones (LJ) 6-12 potential • Potential parameters ==1 • Nearest neighbor interactions • Hexagonal lattice structure; (111) plane of FCC lattice • Impedance force calculated numerically for hexagonal lattice, LJ potential • Hexagonal lattice with nearest neighbors

  10. 7.4 Two-Dimensional Wave Propagation • MD region given initial displacements with both high and low frequencies similar to 1D example • 30000 bridging scale atoms, 90000 full MD atoms • 1920 finite elements (600 in coupled MD/FE region) • 50 atoms per finite element • Initial MD displacements

  11. 2D Wave Propagation • Snapshots of wave propagation

  12. 2D Wave Propagation • Final displacements in MD region if MD impedance force is applied. • Final displacements in MD region if MD impedance force is not applied.

  13. 2D Wave Propagation • Energy Transfer Rates: • No BC: 35.47% • nc = 0: 90.94% • nc = 4: 95.27% • Full MD: 100% • nc = 0: 0 neighbors • nc = 1: 3 neighbors • nc = 2: 5 neighbors n-2 n-1 n n+1 n+2

  14. Velocity Vmax t1 Time 7.5 Dynamic Crack Propagation in Two Dimensions • Problem Description: • 90000 atoms, 1800 finite elements (900 in coupled region) • Full MD = 180,000 atoms • 100 atoms per finite element • tFE=40tMD • Ramp velocity BC on FEM

  15. 2D Dynamic Crack Propagation • Beginning of crack opening • Crack propagation just before complete rupture of specimen

  16. 2D Dynamic Crack Propagation • Bridging scale potential energy • Full MD potential energy

  17. 2D Dynamic Crack Propagation • Full domain = 601 atoms • Multiscale 1 = 301 atoms • Multiscale 2 = 201 atoms • Multiscale 3 = 101 atoms • Crack tip velocity/position comparison

  18. Zoom in of Cracked Edge • FEM deformation as a response to MD crack propagation

  19. FEM MD+FEM Velocity Vmax FEM t1 Time 7.6 Dynamic Crack Propagation in Three Dimensions V(t) • 3D FCC lattice • Lennard Jones 6-12 potential • Each FEM = 200 atoms • 1000 FEM, 117000 atoms • Fracture initially along (001) plane Pre-crack V(t)

  20. Initial Configuration • Velocity BC applied out of plane (z-direction) • All non-equilibrium atoms shown

  21. MD/Bridging Scale Comparison • Full MD • Bridging Scale

  22. MD/Bridging Scale Comparison • Full MD • Bridging Scale

  23. MD/Bridging Scale Comparison • Full MD • Bridging Scale

  24. MD/Bridging Scale Comparison • Full MD • Bridging Scale

  25. 7.7 Virtual Atom Cluster Numerical Examples – Bending of CNT • Global buckling pattern is capture by the meshfree method • Local buckling captured by molecular dynamics simulation

  26. VAC coupling with tight binding • Comparison of the average twisting energy between VAC model and tight-binding model • Meshfree discretization of a (9,0) single-walled carbon nanotube

More Related