1 / 25

The After Election Political Landscape

Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona. The After Election Political Landscape. Overview. Introduction: The 49% nation The 2012 election: What happened The 2012 election: Why did it happen The 2012 election: What does it mean for the future.

iniko
Télécharger la présentation

The After Election Political Landscape

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona The After Election Political Landscape

  2. Overview • Introduction: The 49% nation • The 2012 election: What happened • The 2012 election: Why did it happen • The 2012 election: What does it mean for the future

  3. The 49% Nation • In 2000, the nation was divided. • In 2012, the national divisions continue. • The voting public is increasingly disenchanted with both parties. • The divisions are political and cultural.

  4. Values Gap • 10% values gap in 1987 between major party identifiers has increased to 18% in 2012 2012 • 48% approve of gay marriage • 53% agree that abortion should be legal • 46% agree that immigrants threaten American values • 40% Independents, 31% Democrats, 27% Republicans

  5. Divisions within Parties • Republicans • RINOs versus Tea Party • Democrats • Blue Dog Democrats who are fiscally conservative versus Progressives who support big government

  6. Popular Vote by County

  7. Historical StandardsObama Shouldn’t Have Won • 52% say things are off on the wrong track • 55% say economic conditions are poor, staying the same, or getting worse • 76% say the condition of the nation’s economy is not-so-good or poor • 43,000,000 Americans are on food stamps • 7.9% are unemployed • Avg household income has declined $4,000 since 2009 • 35% decline in the value of the avg middle class family’s assets

  8. The 2012: What Happened • Electoral College 2012: 332 Obama 206 Romney 2008: 365 Obama 173 McCain • House 2012: 195 Democrats 234 Republicans 6 Undecided 2010: 193 Democrats 242 Republicans 0 Other • Senate 2012: 53 Democrats 45 Republicans 2 Independents 2010: 51 Democrats 47 Republicans 2 Independents • Turnout (% of those eligible to vote who actually voted) 2012: 57.5% 2008: 62.3% 2004: 60.4% 2000: 54.2%

  9. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  10. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  11. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  12. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  13. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  14. The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

  15. Issues • Economy • Jobs • Immigration • GOP War on Women

  16. Obama Gaffe: You didn’t build that

  17. Romney Gaffe: 47%

  18. Romney Killed My Wife Ad

  19. GOP War on Women

  20. Campaign Factors • Obama defined Romney • Obama had a better ground game • Romney missed opportunities • Hurricane Sandy

  21. Future Political Landscape • Ultimately, voters opted for security over economic freedom and less regulation. • 56% of voters in OH and MI approved of the auto bailout. • Tax increase measures that affect large number of voters are opposed by the majority.

  22. Future Political Landscape • Neither candidates nor voters endorse serious solutions • Only taxing those making over $250K enjoyed a majority of support. • That would raise $80 billion with a $1.4 trillion deficit. • National debt likely to rise to $20 trillion by 2016.

  23. Future Political Landscape • Demographics have changed less than pundits proclaim. • Turnout raises the impact of some groups more than others. • Low Evangelical turnout in 2008 • Low White turnout in 2012 • Gender gap probably less when other factors like income and marital status are considered

  24. Future Political Landscape • Young voters have somewhat different social values than their parents • Campaigns will continue to be negative because it works • Gridlock in Congress will lead to more government by regulations than by legislation

  25. Future Political Landscape • Trust in government is likely to remain low 76% trusted federal government to do the right thing in 1964 8% trust the government today • Social media will continue to increase in importance as campaign media

More Related