1 / 36

500K planet at 1.0 , 0.5 , 0.3 AU around a G2V Barman et al. (ApJ 556, 885, 2001)

500K planet at 1.0 , 0.5 , 0.3 AU around a G2V Barman et al. (ApJ 556, 885, 2001). Contrast Hot Jupiter vs planet at 5 AU. Hot Jupiter contrast to a G2 and M5 Day side (substellar point). Pegasides. • T eq ~ 1250 K (Guillot et al. 1996).

iram
Télécharger la présentation

500K planet at 1.0 , 0.5 , 0.3 AU around a G2V Barman et al. (ApJ 556, 885, 2001)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 500K planet at 1.0, 0.5,0.3AU around a G2VBarman et al. (ApJ 556, 885, 2001)

  2. Contrast Hot Jupiter vs planet at 5 AU

  3. Hot Jupiter contrast to aG2 and M5 Day side (substellar point)

  4. Pegasides • Teq ~ 1250 K (Guillot et al. 1996) - Jeans Evaporation without danger for the planet’s survival - No mass transfer (atm < lobe de Roche) • Rotation / revolution synch. : zonal winds > 1 km/s (Showman et Guillot 2002)  energy redistribution • Entire convective planet : evolution in 2 phases 1) rapid contraction Teff 2) slow cooling + insulation  reduced thermal gradient ( Jupiter)  external radiative zone+ slowed gravitational contraction  R > RJupiter • Spectra : - Visible = reflected (Tbolo Teff) - IR = thermal emission - spectral signatures (Na, K, CO, H2O) - role of clouds (ex. silicates) (Baraffe et al. 2003)

  5. Classe Distance Teq Espèces dominantes remarques 1 qq u.a. < 150 K CH4, NH3 IR faible 2 1-2 u.a.  250 K H2O bandes de H2O 3 1 u.a. 350-800K H20, CH4, Na, K albedo faible absence de nuages 4 0.1 u.a. 1000 K CO, Na, K, Li, Ru, H20 Silicates pas visibles 5 0.05 u.a.  1400 K H20, CO , nuages cf. après Atmospheres and spectra of giant exoplanets • Spectra determined by the chemical composition of the external atmosphere • BUT  stars (hot) condensed species that contribute to the opacity: - H20 solid, Fe solid - Enstatite, forsterite, CaTiO3 • Visual (reflected) + IR (thermal emission) • Temperature (distance the star) Sudarsky et al., 2003

  6. Gas giant spectra Sudarsky et al., 2003

  7. Comparison to other model atmospheres This compares our Teff=100K, logg=3.0, model irradiated with the same flux as a particular set of models from Hubeny, Sudarsky, Burrows 2003. The difference between the dashed line and solid black lines is the presence (solid) and absence (dashed) of TiO & VO- opacity.

  8. Charbonneau et al., 2002 Observational Constraints Na I D Observation  Monochromatic radius Rp = 1.42 +0.1/-0.13 RJup  opacity stronger at  - Weaker neutral Na concentration than expected ? - High altitude clouds (reduces the limb size) - departure from local thermodynamic equilibrium Discussion about HD 209458 b’s radius: Cf. Allard Darwin Conf. 2003

  9. Na I D et HD209458bBarman et al. (ApJ 569, L51, 2002) Left: Monochromatic radius of HD209458b, based upon the Phoenix model atmospheres with Na in LTE (in black) and non-LTE. Right: Transit depth at wavelengths centered around the Na I D doublet, relative to the transit depth in adjacent bands, based upon the models on the left.The points are observations by Charbonneau et al. (2002).

  10. Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003)

  11. Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003)

  12. Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003)

  13. Emergent and reflected spectra (Tint=100K) a=0.023AU Teq=2400K a=0.046AU Teq=1700K Compares the SEDs for HD209458b and OGLE-TR56b. Also shows the pure reflected contributions for both. TR56b is closer and hotter to the parent star and, therefore, a larger fraction of the optical spectrum is due entirely to thermal reradiation of absorbed stellar flux. This is not the case for HD.

  14. Vidal-Madjar et al., 2003 Lyman  observation • 15% attenuation of Lyman  during the transit (1.5% of • the surface) - Roche Lobe: R = 3.6 Rjup at 8.5 R* - If the Roche Lobe fills, 10% attenuation of Lyman   H2 escape Texosphere Teq (Lammer, Selsis et al.)

  15. Phase Temperature-Pressure (T-P) profile of HD209458b’s atmosphere for several concentric regions (lines of constant incident flux) around the substellar point. The upper curve corresponds to the substellar point. The dotted curves correspond to regions intermédiate to the substellar point and the terminator. The lowermost curve corresponds to the non-light hemisphere.

  16. Perspectives Model atmospheres, thermal profiles, spectra and synthetic photometry of Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets (with and without stellar irradiation) are available for all stages of evolution: http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/france.allard • Phase spectra, Global Atmospheric Circulation • Thermal Escape, Gravitational Sedimentation, Photochemistry • Sub- jovien and telluric Planet Atmospheres

  17. Conclusions

More Related