1 / 11

Rate the research papers

Rate the research papers. This paper asks you to. Construct an inductive argument (question at beginning, thesis/answer/solution at the end) Pitch it to a specific audience Take into account that audience’s FBIs and F&P concepts as you organize, develop, & present the paper

iram
Télécharger la présentation

Rate the research papers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rate the research papers

  2. This paper asks you to • Construct an inductive argument (question at beginning, thesis/answer/solution at the end) • Pitch it to a specific audience • Take into account that audience’s FBIs and F&P concepts as you organize, develop, & present the paper • Find sources that audience will respect • Show your thinking—go thru alternatives, use SEE-IT • Execute with accuracy and precision • Pass a CAIR standards check on your own pitch

  3. Remember you have already • Analyzed your own FBIs and F&P concepts—reflection/conclusions at the end (somewhat inductive) • Analyzed how Fallows made his case to a specific audience in a deductive argument (thesis at the beginning) • Analyzed how a cultural events presenter made a pitch specifically to you • Used your F&P concepts and P.O.V. to look at a section of Wilson • Evaluated how well others looked at Wilson…

  4. Pitch defined purpose and clearly stated question/problem at issue and clearly connected it to a green agenda (5) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  5. Pitch tailored information to a specific and identifiable audience, including allowing for its FBIs and its F&P concepts (8) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  6. Using an inductive strategy, writer established context, exposed barriers, established P.O.V. (5) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  7. Heavy preponderance of sources from appropriate peer-reviewed or disciplinary accepted sources (Nosich ch. 3) gave pitch credibility (5) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  8. Writer provided adequate, credible information and analyzed its importance (use of SEE-IT) (10) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  9. Organization was clear, psychologically appropriate and logical (7) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  10. Writer showed work & weighed alternatives, options, outcomes, solutions appropriately and thoroughly, meeting the standards of depth, breadth, and sufficiency (10) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

  11. Using an inductive strategy, writer made a clear and convincing recommendation to solve the problem and showed the implications of doing so, meeting the CAIR standards (5) • Dick Van Dyke • Bill Murray • Emily Dickinson • LeBron James • Omarosa • Phil Mickelson

More Related