1 / 14

Update on U.S. Internet Gambling: New and Pending Federal and State Legislation and Regulation

Update on U.S. Internet Gambling: New and Pending Federal and State Legislation and Regulation. by Mark Hichar Partner, Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge. Pending Federal iGaming Legislation: The "Frank Bill" Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) - May, 2009

irisa
Télécharger la présentation

Update on U.S. Internet Gambling: New and Pending Federal and State Legislation and Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Update on U.S. Internet Gambling: New and Pending Federal and StateLegislation and Regulation by Mark Hichar Partner, Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge PRV 1062810.1

  2. Pending Federal iGaming Legislation: • The "Frank Bill" Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) - May, 2009 Companion Tax BillRep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) – May, 2009 • Bill to Delay the UIGEA RegulationsRep. Frank - May, 2009 • "The Menendez Bill“Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) - August, 2009 • Tax Reform Legislation Including iGamingSen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) - February, 2010

  3. The Frank Bill (H. 2267) • Licensing Requirements for iGaming operators – all types of games, except sports-betting – 5 year license term, renewable • Only licensed operators could accept bets from persons in the U.S. (Treasury would be licensing authority) • Vendors managing or controlling bets would have to meet the same suitability criteria as licensees • States and Indian tribal authorities could "opt-out" • Payment processors not liable if following State law • Status: • 66 Co-sponsors as of March 15, 2010 • Committee Hearing Held December 3, 2009 • Now with Subcommittee of House Judiciary Committee

  4. McDermott Bill (H. 2268) • License fee due from iGaming operators – 2% of amounts deposited per month • Fee for allowing unauthorized wagering accounts – 50% of the amounts deposited • iGaming operators required to file returns identifying players, their gross and net winnings, and gross wagers • Withholding of taxes on net iGaming winnings Status: • Had 5 Co-sponsors as of March 15, 2010 • No Hearings or other actions.

  5. The Bill to Delay the UIGEA Regs (H. 2266) • Would extend from December 1, 2009, to December 1, 2010, the deadline for compliance with UIGEA regs • Status: • 55 Co-sponsors as of March 15, 2010 • Committee Hearing Held December 3, 2009 • No subsequent action • Probably obsolete in light of 6-month delay granted • No further delays expected • UIGEA Regs to take effect June 1, 2010

  6. The Menendez Bill (S. 1597) • Licensing Requirements for iGaming operators – Only covers skill games. Sports betting excluded. – 5 year license term, renewable • Peer-to-peer poker only • Only licensed operators could accept bets from persons in the U.S. (Treasury would be licensing authority) • Monthly Fee – 10% of funds deposited for wagering -- ½ to Fed Gov’t; ½ to participating States and Tribes • States and Tribes could "opt-out" • Requires creation of a list of unlawful iGaming operators • Status: No action taken – No sponsors

  7. The Wyden/Gregg Bill (S. 3018) • Similar to Frank/McDermott but not stand-alone • License fee same – 2% of wagering sums deposited • Reporting the same • Licensing requirements the same • License term the same – 5 year, subject to renewal • Same suitability requirements • Similar requirement to address problem gambling • Similar “opt-out” right for states and tribes • Status: • Bill Has 2 Co-sponsors as of March 15, 2010 • No Major Actions.

  8. UIGEA Developments • The UIGEA Regulations: • were to take effect December 1, 2009 • delayed until June 1, 2010 (on Nov. 27, 2009) • fulfill the UIGEA's requirement that banks and transaction processors establish procedures • to permit identification of restricted transactions • to decline or block those transactions • Mid-November, 2009: MasterCard changed its Rules • Required card issuers (banks) to decline ALL iGaming payment transactions • MasterCard has issued new Card Acceptor Business Code: MC 9754 (Gambling – Horse Racing, Dog Racing and State Lotteries) – effective June 1, 2010

  9. iGaming Activity in Certain States • New Jersey Bill Pending • Florida Bill Pending • California Activity • Illinois recently-enacted legislation

  10. New Jersey Poker Bill filed January, 2010 • Atlantic City casinos could be additionally licensed to offer iGaming intrastate to NJ residents -- all games except sports wagering • Licenses valid for one-year, subject to renewal • Annual taxes 20% of gross wagering revenue • Licensing fees $200k initially, $200k/yr thereafter • All gaming-related equipment would be required to be located within Atlantic County, NJ • iGaming terminals (could be identical to slot machines) could be placed at tracks – with tracks’ agreement

  11. Pending Florida Poker Bill – February, 2010 • Internet hub operators licensed to run poker sites for offering peer-to-peer (“unbanked”) intrastate poker • Hub Operator Fees/Taxes • $500k initial license application fee • 10% of monthly gross receipts fee • Tax of 20% of monthly gross receipts from play  • “Cardroom Affiliates” additionally licensed to provide portals to poker network – fee 4% of gross receipts • Players’ per hand fee: flat, hourly, or % of pot • Hub Operator Required Qualifications include: • licensed to operate gaming or lottery in the U.S. • licensed to conduct iGaming where legal in one or more jurisdictions outside the U.S.

  12. California iGaming Activity • California lawmakers considering legalizing Internet poker to raise revenue • Morongo Band of Mission Indians in favor of their proposal • Other California Tribes are opposed • Believe fewer will visit brick-and-mortar casinos • Argue iGaming would violate tribal compacts • A California Senate committee held an informational hearing in February, 2010, but no formal Bill yet

  13. Illinois Law Enacted and Amended in 2009 • Contemplates a pilot program whereby Illinois lottery games would be sold intrastate via the Internet • Requires DoJ review of the implementation plan • Plan will go forward only if the DoJ “does not object . . . within a reasonable period of time after its review.”

  14. THANK YOU Mark Hichar, Partner Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP tel: +1 401 276 6588 fax: +1 401 276 6611 mhichar@eapdlaw.com 111 Huntington Avenue 2800 Financial Plaza Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7613 USA Providence, Rhode Island 02903 USA

More Related