Summative Evaluation Configuration

1. Summative Evaluation Configuration Washington Township Public Schools 2013-2014

2. Summative Weightings for Teachers with an SGP

3. Summative Weightings for Teachers without an SGP

4. Summative Weightings for • Certified, Non-Classroom Staff

5. Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score • Step 1: Rate observed elements at each of the following levels: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1), and Not Using (0)

6. Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score • Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for each of the four domains • Step 3: For each domain, determine the percentage of the total each level represents. (Automatically calculated on spreadsheet.)

7. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 1 Innovating Applying Developing Beginning Not Using

8. STATUS SCORE Directions: • Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded • Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells

9. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 2 Innovating Applying Developing Beginning Not Using

10. STATUS SCORE • Directions: • 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded • 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells

11. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 3 Innovating Applying Developing Beginning Not Using

12. STATUS SCORE • Directions: • 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded • 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells

13. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 4 Innovating Applying Developing Beginning Not Using

14. STATUS SCORE • Directions: • 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded • 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells

15. Summative Evaluation Configuration for Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model • Summative Evaluation Configuration for Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model

16. Score for a Classroom Teacher ?? ?? ?? ?? 14% 3 3 ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? 2.92 ???? Applying

17. Review Part 1 • Q: True or False: All 4 Domains contribute to the calculation of my Overall Status Score • A: True. Staff members’ final summative status score will include ratings in all 4 Marzano Domains.

18. Review Part 1 • Q: All 4 Domains contribute equal weighting in the calculation of my Overall Status Score. T/F? • A: False, Domains with the more elements have a greater weight. Domain 1 has the greatest weight.

19. Score for a Classroom Teacher ?? ?? ?? ?? 14% 3 3 ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? 2.92 ???? Applying

20. Summative Evaluation Vocabulary • Status Score – The whole number score received for each domain. • Overall Status Score – The final cumulative score after each domain has been weighted and combined. • Proficiency Scale – The “cut score” (or percentage) that determines the Status Score. • Category of Teacher – As per Achieve NJ, teachers are divided into three categories based on number of years experience. • Category 1: Non-Tenured, Years 1 & 2 • Category 2: Non-Tenured, Years 3 & 4 • Category 3: Tenured

21. Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score •Step 4: For each domain, apply the results from Step 3 to the description for each level on the Proficiency Scale (based on teacher’s experience level/category). This is a domain proficiencyscore and will be a number between 1 and 4. • • Category I: 1-2 years • • Category II: 3-4 years • • Category III: tenured

22. Summative Evaluation Configuration for Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model • Represents the percentage of “Innovative” ratings needed in a Domain to be considered “Innovative” for that Domain in summation. • Represents the percentage of combined “Innovative” and “Applying” ratings needed in a Domain to be considered “Applying” for that Domain in summation.

23. Proficiency Scale for Category I Teachers The Washington Township District Evaluation Advisory Committee (DEAC) has decided that we will utilize the same proficiency scale for all categories of teachers for the next 2 years. After 2 years, we will review our evaluation data to determine future scales. The scale for all teachers and non-classroom staff members is below: Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0)

24. Learning Sciences Recommended Scales: Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0)

25. Review Part 2 • Q: Are you in category I, II, or III? • A: Non-tenured – year 1 or 2 – Category I Non-tenured – year 3 or 4 – Category II Tenured – Category III

26. Review Part 2 • Q: To be “Applying” in a given Domain what combined percentage of “applying” and “innovating” ratings must I earn in that Domain? • A: 55% combined.

27. Innovating Score Sample 45 11 1 7 3 Innovating – 4Applying – 3Developing -2Beginning – 1Not Using - 0 68.18% At Innovating Matches the Rule for Innovating (4): “At Least 55% at Innovating- 4 or Higher” Score if Averaged: 2.7

28. ApplyingScore Sample 36 10 12 7 1 Innovating – 4Applying – 3Developing -2Beginning – 1Not Using - 0 69.7% At Applying - 3 or Innovating - 4 Matches the Rule for Applying (3): “At Least 55% at Applying - 3 or Higher” Score if Averaged: 2.7

29. Beginning Score Sample 24 17 15 10 0 Innovating – 4Applying – 3Developing -2Beginning – 1Not Using - 0 59.09% At Beginning - 1 or Not Using - 0 Matches the Rule for Beginning (1): “50% or more at Beginning -1 or Lower” Score if Averaged: 1.4

30. Developing Score Sample 20 22 15 1 8 Innovating – 4Applying – 3Developing -2Beginning – 1Not Using - 0 24.25% At Applying - 3 or Higher AND 42.42% At Beginning - 1 or Lower Matches the Rule for Developing (2): “Less than 55% at Applying - 3 or Higher and Less than 50% at Beginning -1 or Lower” Score if Averaged: 1.8

31. Score for a Category I Teacher 3 14% 3 3 0.42 2.04 0.42 0.16 0.30 0.39 0.30 2.92 Applying

32. Score for a Non-Classroom Teacher 3 49% 21% 12% 18% Non-Classroom Weights 3 3 1.47 0.63 0.24 0.54 2.88 Applying

33. Review Part 3 • Q. The calculation of a classroom teacher’s Overall Status Score is the same regardless on tenure/non-tenure status. T/F? • A: True

34. Review Part 3 • Q. The calculation of a staff member’s Overall Status Score is basically a weighted average of their ratings in the 4 Marzano Domains? T/F? • A: True, but remember that the 4 Domain Status Scores themselves reflect the 55% threshold for “Applying” and “Innovating.”

35. Review Part 3 • Q. The Overall Status Score (2.92 and 2.88 in the examples) is my final AchieveNJrating. T/F? • A: False for teachers as SGP and SGO results are not factored in. True for certified, non-classroom faculty.

36. Achieve NJ Summative Scale Remember: This includes SGP and SGO results as applicable. This is the number the state uses to determine educator effectiveness level

37. Any questions?