1 / 22

Power Estimation & Analysis ; power calculation needs three models ; architecture, component, and activity

Power Estimation & Analysis ; power calculation needs three models ; architecture, component, and activity. Architecture ; component allocation. Scheduling operations. clock & power network. Lower-level specification. Estimation vs. Analysis. Analysis ;

ishmael
Télécharger la présentation

Power Estimation & Analysis ; power calculation needs three models ; architecture, component, and activity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Power Estimation & Analysis ;power calculation needs three models ; architecture, component, and activity Architecture ; component allocation Scheduling operations clock & power network Lower-level specification

  2. Estimation vs. Analysis • Analysis ; • for a given structure, i.e., netlist of components • Estimation (=design prediction followed by analysis) ; • when the information on the structure of the design is incomplete • Used to explore different design alternatives, and find the best • Example ; to estimate the interconnect power, one needs a floorplan prediction with clock and power network • In exploring the alternatives, often times, maintaining relative order between the prediction and actual implementation is enough.

  3. Homework • Draw a Low-Power design flow based on • Top-down design flow starting from system-level to architecture, RTL, gate, circuit, and layout • Power analysis in each level using three models • Reference ; C. Piguet, Low-Power CMOS; circuit technology logic and CAD tools

  4. System-level power analysis • System-level design Process ; • 1) allocation of components • 2) partitioning system’s task onto these components (or, sub-systems) • 3) organizing cooperation among components bound • System-level design Inputs ; • Specification ; • E.g., CDFG… • Environmental constraints ; • E.g., performance, power, cost, form factors, TTM, number/load of I/O’s • Design space restriction ; • E.g., enforced using some cores, available chip area, bus structure, etc.

  5. Implementation model • Should be used when execution model is not available, typically using spread sheet • Usually start with a platform ; HW- and SW-platform • Basically three components ; • COTS (off-the-shelf components); • maybe only a single figure available from vendors such as watts/MHz@VDD for a processor • Guess based on experience, know-how • Customer-specific module; • Needs estimation based on prediction on number of gates, activity factor, and technology scaling factor • Power consumption of this module may be insignificant, but its use can replace the power-hungry processor. • Communication power; • Data transfer between blocks • Clock power, cross-coupling • What was ignored; software structure, data

  6. Execution model • Typically given as a program in C, HDL, SystemC, or some heterogeneous combination of these • Allows more detailed power analysis as the dynamic system behavior is simulated ; • component power model, • system architecture, and • component activation pattern needed • For example, BFM (bus functional model) and the activity information for each processor components such as issue queue, branch prediction unit, execution unit, cache, register file are needed

  7. Memory model • DTSE work by Catthor • Assume that memory is the dominant power consuming part in signal processing applications • Memory optimization in terms of power should be dome first • Objective; • increase data locality • Suppress memory access • Optimize memory hierarchy • By doing • Perform global loop and control flow transformations • Data reuse analysis • Storage cycle distribution • Memory allocation and assignment • In-place optimization

  8. Memory model • Memory chip ; power model is available in the data sheet • Compiled memory core ; • Power model should be parameterized, at least, in terms of size. For that, simulation model is needed. But due to flat hierarchy simulation model of memory takes too long time. • Therefore, abstraction model is needed. Capacitance model is difficult to get as it reveals critical information of the memory vendor. -> Functional models not disclosing any internal cell structure is okay.

  9. Other things to include in the execution model • Interconnect power model • Input ; physical layout and material properties • Built based on measurement and simulation • However, on-chip interconnect is difficult to model, especially when complex bus encoding is used. • Models for power management policy • Hardware for DPM (dynamic power mgmt) • Software • RTOS

  10. Algorithm-Level Power Estimation in Orinoco • Activity estimation ; • Code instrumentation ; inserts protocol statements to capture the activity during execution • Architecture estimation ; • High-level synthesis ; • Scheduling • Allocation • Binding • Physical Planning • Floorplanning • Clock tree generation

  11. Algorithmic-level power estimation and analysis • Algorithmic-level design • Objective; optimize in terms of performance, cost and power • Means; • Selection of algorithm performing the requested function • Optimization of the algorithm • Partitioning the algorithm into HW and SW

  12. Algorithm selection ; selecting the most power-efficient one • Comparison is based on the most power-efficient realization without actual implementation. • Optimization ; • Reducing # of control statements, e.g., by loop unrolling, local statement reordering, memory access reordering • Floating-point for SW vs. fixed-point arithmetic for HW • Partitioning ; • Trade-off analysis between HW and SW implementations • SW-to-HW transformation ; moving the computational kernels of the algorithm to power-optimized application-specific hardware • No need for consecutive control steps to perform a single instruction • No need for memory access to find out what to do next • Minimal datapath just for performing the given task • Maximal concurrency exploitable compared to processor core

  13. Software power analysis • Objective ; • Compare different programs • Select processors • Optimize software • Three level of granularity • Source code level • Instruction level • BFM level • Execution performed on • Target processor • Another processor • Simulator

  14. RTL Power Modeling = Constructing a model P=P (X1,X2,…Xn) from n model parameters • Model granularity ; • not too big • Not too small • FSMD (FSM with datapath) is a reasonable choice • Model Parameters ; • What parameters are to be included in the model? • Model parameters must be observable at the RTL • P total = k AiCi ; Power model decoupled into two separate models, i.e., activity model and capacitance model

  15. Dual bit type for representing fixed-point data • Capacitance for each bit position in the register experiences a different history • Instead of white noise assumption for each bit position, assume a proper correlation (with ) between consecutive data in the same bi tposition

More Related