1 / 18

Hawaii Technology Development Venture TechEnterprise 2006 Conference Leveraging Technology for the Warfighter June 1

Hawaii Technology Development Venture TechEnterprise 2006 Conference Leveraging Technology for the Warfighter June 13, 2006 Cliff Hudson Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego chudson@spawar.navy.mil (619) 553-7442.

isleen
Télécharger la présentation

Hawaii Technology Development Venture TechEnterprise 2006 Conference Leveraging Technology for the Warfighter June 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hawaii Technology Development Venture TechEnterprise 2006 Conference Leveraging Technology for the Warfighter June 13, 2006 Cliff Hudson Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego chudson@spawar.navy.mil(619) 553-7442

  2. Acting Deputy Director,Defense Research & EngineeringMrs. Sue Payton Director of , Defense Research & Engineering Mr. John J. Young, Jr DTIC Dir, Plans & Programs Dr. Bill Berry, Acting DUSD, Laboratories And Basic Sciences Dr. Charles Holland DUSD, Science & Technology Ms. Sue Payton DUSD, Advanced Systems & Concepts Dr. Tony Tether Defense Advanced Research Projects

  3. TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 A B C DUSD(AS&C) Transition Programs Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition (Engineering Development, Demonstration, LRIP & Production) Sustainment & Maintenance System Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Concept & Tech Development Support DARPA ACTD ($214,000,000) DUS&T - $0.0 TTI ($21,000,000) DACP – ($25,116,000) JWP - $10M FCT – ($36,833,000) Tech Link ($8,100,000) IR&D ($2,821,000,000)* QRF ManTech ($175,700,000) http://www.acq.osd.mil/asc DPA Title III ($42,765,000) *Contractor Funding

  4. FY 2006 RDT&E President’s Budget Request $69.4B OSD Defense Wide Transition Programs Highly Leveraged across Service and Agency Budgets. Less than half a percent of RDT&E supports AS&C programs BA7 Operational Systems Development ($21.16B) (BA6 + BA7 = $24.93B) BA6 RDT&E Management Support ($3.77B) BA5 System Development & Demonstration ($19.75B) Development (BA4 + BA5 = $33.89B) BA4 Advanced Component Development & Prototypes ($14.14B) Defense Wide DUSD (AS&C) RDT&E Support Totals $311 M (~200 M from ACTD/JCTD BA-3) Technology Base (BA1 + 2) = $5.46B) Science and Technology (BA1 + BA2 + BA3 = $10.52B) BA3 Advanced Technology Development ($5.06B) 15% of RDT&E BA2 Applied Research ($4.14B) BA1 Basic Research ($1.32B)

  5. Technology Transfer Labs Companies DoD Warfighters Technology Transition Based on: 15 USC 3710-15, Technology Innovation 10 USC 2515, Office of Technology Transition 10 USC 2359a, Technology Transition Initiative

  6. Why DoD does Tech Transfer • 15 USC 3710(a) “(1) It is the continuing responsibility of the Federal Government to ensure the full use of the results of the Nation’s Federal investment in research and development.” • 10 USC 2514. Encouragement of technology transfer “(a) The Secretary of Defense shall encourage. . .the transfer of technology between laboratories and research centers of the DoD and other Federal agencies, State and local governments, colleges and universities, and private persons in cases that are likely to result in accomplishing the objectives set forth in section 2510(a) of this title. “(b) The Secretary shall examine and implement methods. . .that are consistent with national security objectives and will enable Department of Defense personnel to promote technology transfer.”

  7. 15 USC 3715 Partnership Intermediaries • Authorizes contracts/MoUs for partnership intermediaries • Authorizes funding out of funds available for support of the technology transfer function • Partnership Intermediary: • An agency of a State or local government, or a nonprofit entity that assists, counsels, advises, evaluates, or otherwise cooperates with small business firms or institutions of higher education, that need or can make demonstrably productive use of technology-related assistance from a Federal laboratory. • To provide services for the Federal laboratory that increase the likelihood of success in the conduct of cooperative or joint activities of such Federal laboratory.

  8. OSD – TT Network • Maximize benefits of the OSD TT network • Reduce duplication • Spread best practices • Leverage each others expertise • Coordinate efforts where applicable • Eliminate confusion within agencies/labs

  9. PIs CURRENT DoD T2 SYSTEM DoD - Military Operations OTT AF DoD Labs US Industry

  10. Technology Identification Technology Selection TT Facilitation US Industry FirstResponders Current OSD PI - TT Network OSD DoD Labs • Licensing • CRADAs & Other T2 Agreements • SBIR Outreach • MilTech • Licensing • CRADAs &Other T2 Agreements • SBIR Outreach Licensing – CRADAs – Other TT Agreements

  11. CURRENT OTT PIs DoD Agencies and Labs US Industry First Responders

  12. General Comments • TechLink continues to provide a high Return on Investment (ROI) to DoD: Nearly 4:1 to date (~$35 million on expenditures of ~$9 million) • How can we see an RoI for ALL Partnership Intermediaries? • What should it be?

  13. Partnership Intermediary facilitating transfer of DoD technologies for use by the first responder community.

  14. DoD TechMatch http://www.dodtechmatch.com

  15. The Institute for Defense and Homeland Security (IDHS) is an organization of university, industry and federal research and development members dedicated to delivering world-class science and technology solutions in response to national defense and homeland security requirements. IDHS will conduct research, education and technology transition at member institutions and firms, with an emphasis in the fields of telecommunications, biodefense, sensor systems, risk management, crisis management and remote presence. Industry members will commercialize technology and develop solutions that support rapid deployment of advanced technology and new capabilities.

  16. Dept. of Commerce / NIST / MEPManufacturing Extension PartnershipSupporting U.S. industry, Federal Laboratories, and DoD suppliers with technology transfer, transition and commercialization. Goal: to help manufacturers transition new technology more quickly, efficiently, and cost-effectively to the U.S. warfighter. Dan Pitkin, Business & Technology Advisor OSD (AS&C) OTT: daniel.pitkin@osd.mil 703-607-5313 DOC (NIST) MEP: dan.pitkin@nist.gov 301-975-4734 The MEP National System strengthens the global competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing by providing business and technical assistance to companies using DoD technology, or to companies that are developing new technologies that enhance the value of products and services supplied to Defense.

  17. Readiness Levels Technology Manufacturing

More Related