1 / 30

Data Source: 2007-2008 AYP data from the Pennsylvania Department of Education

2. 2. No Child Left Behind requires Districts

issac
Télécharger la présentation

Data Source: 2007-2008 AYP data from the Pennsylvania Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. 1 Report on 2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for District and Schools

    2. 2

    3. 3 Student Achievement Performance Targets Increased in 2008

    4. 4 Snapshot of District vs. State Student Achievement Performance: 2002-08

    5. 5

    6. 6

    7. 7

    8. 8 Meeting AYP in Performance is Complicated Met AYP: AYP is met by meeting or exceeding the state targets. Other ways of meeting AYP: Confidence Interval (CI): AYP is met by using a 95% Confidence Interval around the target. Safe Harbor (SH): AYP is met by Safe Harbor, when the number of students in the Basic or Below Basic category is reduced by 10% from the year before. Safe Harbor Confidence Interval (SHC): AYP is met when the number of students in the Basic or Below Basic category is reduced by 10% from the year before, using a 75% confidence interval. Pennsylvania Performance Index (PPI): AYP is met by using an improvement criteria set by the state that looks at growth over time across all levels.

    9. 9

    10. 10

    11. 11 In each grade band, the District is held accountable for subgroups of 40 or more students.

    12. 12 The District missed making AYP by a very small margin, meeting all Reading and Mathematics targets except in one subgroup in grades 6-8. Grades 6-8 Performance Met Reading? Met Mathematics? All Yes Yes White Yes Yes African-American Yes Yes Latino/Hispanic Yes Yes Asian Yes Yes Multiracial Yes Yes Individual Education Plan (IEP) No No English Language Learners Yes Yes Economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes

    13. 13

    14. 14 If 32 more of approximately 1,350 students demonstrated proficiency in Mathematics, and 48 more in Reading, IEP subgroups would have met AYP targets via Safe Harbor. The District would have made AYP because one grade span would have met all performance targets. If 32 more of approximately 1,350 students demonstrated proficiency in Mathematics, and 48 more in Reading, IEP subgroups would have met AYP targets via Safe Harbor. The District would have made AYP because one grade span would have met all performance targets.

    15. 15 The 2008 District AYP Status is Corrective Action II (This is the second year for this status.) Corrective Action II means that the District may be subject to action taken by the State, such as the following: Deferring programmatic funds or reducing administrative funds Implementing new curriculum Replacing staff Appointing a trustee to administer the District in place of the Superintendent and school board Establishing alternative arrangements for supervision of certain schools Abolishing or restructuring the District.

    16. 16

    17. 17 A school can have a good year, but not make AYP.

    18. 18 10 schools missed just one performance target and therefore did not make AYP. 12/14/2011 Data Source: 2007-2008 PSSA data from the Pennsylvania Department of Education

    19. 19 2008 AYP School Status

    20. 20 From 2007 to 2008, schools overall increased the percentage of targets met even as the total number of AYP targets increased.

    21. 21 2008 AYP Status: K-5 Schools

    22. 22 2008 AYP Status: K-8 Schools

    23. 23 2008 AYP Status: Middle Schools

    24. 24 2008 AYP Status: High Schools

    25. 25 2008 AYP Status: ALAs

    26. 26

    27. 27

    28. 28

    29. 29

    30. 30 Update on Environmental Charter School Enrollment

More Related