1 / 7

V6OPS WG – IETF #85 IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts

V6OPS WG – IETF #85 IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts. draft-korhonen-v6ops-rfc3316bis-00 Jouni Korhonen , Jari Arkko, Teemu Savolainen, Suresh Krishnan. Outline. Motivation for RFC 3316bis What has been changed Removed from RFC 3316 Clarifications on the existing text

ivana
Télécharger la présentation

V6OPS WG – IETF #85 IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. V6OPS WG – IETF #85IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts draft-korhonen-v6ops-rfc3316bis-00 Jouni Korhonen, Jari Arkko, Teemu Savolainen, Suresh Krishnan

  2. Outline • Motivation for RFC 3316bis • What has been changed • Removed from RFC 3316 • Clarifications on the existing text • New additions to RFC 3316 • Next steps

  3. Motivation for RFC 3316bis • RFC 3316 was done ~9 years ago, prior IPv6 Node Requirements; No need to repeat RFC 6434 (was RFC 4294) Node Requirements content. • Reflect recent 3GPP developments and experience. • Some IPv6 RFCs are not mandated by 3GPP but make sense e.g., in hosts with multiple interfaces. • Keep it simple and conservative. This is not a 3GPP document or a tool for driving deployment specific requirements!

  4. What has been changed – removed parts • Removal of all sections that can be directly found from RFC 6434 and do not require specific attention in 3GPP system: • IPv6 “basics”, PMTUD, IKE/IPsec, default address selection to name few..

  5. What has been changed – clarifications • Clarifications to 3GPP link model and how Neighbor Discovery works on it. • Previous text in RFC 3316 was sometimes misinterpreted.. • And there have been too many broken cellular host implementations and too strict GGSNs. • Already documented in RFC 6459 – endorsed here. • Clarification on the primary 3GPP IPv6 transition mechanism.. • ..which still is dual-stack. The rest are up to specific deployments. • Made the PPP IPV6CP support text conditional.

  6. What has been changed – new additions • Addition of 3GPP EPS text i.e., Release-8 and onwards. • Addition of RFC 4191 (router preferences) recommendations. • Addition of DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation recommendations, which is new to 3GPP Release-10. • Addition of RFC 6106 (RDNSS) recommendations. • Addition of RFC 5555 (DSMIPv6) regarding client based mobility, which is new to 3GPP Release-8. • Addition of Router Advertisement MTU option handling. • Addition of RFC 5095 that deprecates the RH0. • Addition of RFC 5722 and draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers regarding the IPv6 fragmentation handling. • Addition of RFC 6583 for Neighbor Discovery denial-of-service attack considerations.

  7. Next steps • Is there interest working on RFC 3316bis? • Adopt as a working group document..?

More Related