1 / 8

LLP Leonardo TOI INCOM-VET Quality Assurance of Deliverables WP5

LLP Leonardo TOI INCOM-VET Quality Assurance of Deliverables WP5. WP’s Leader: University of Aosta Valley (IT ) Kick off Meeting Vilnius, 7-8 November 2013. WP4 Quality assurance of deliverables. WHAT? ORGANIZATION ( consortium , partners , stakeholders , roles , cooperation )

ivo
Télécharger la présentation

LLP Leonardo TOI INCOM-VET Quality Assurance of Deliverables WP5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LLP Leonardo TOI INCOM-VETQualityAssuranceofDeliverablesWP5 WP’s Leader: Universityof Aosta Valley (IT) Kick off Meeting Vilnius, 7-8 November 2013

  2. WP4 Quality assurance of deliverables WHAT? • ORGANIZATION • (consortium, partners, stakeholders, roles, cooperation) • STRUCTURE • (WPs, tools, endowements and equipments) • ACTION PLAN • (scheduledactivities, outputs, dissemination/valorization)

  3. WHEN? 1.EX-ANTE AND FINAL EVALUATION: Supervision of quality standards • coherence, pertinence, readability, sustainabilityofthe outputs 2.ONGOING SELF-ASSESSMENT Formative accompaniment of the partnership • Reflective/monitoringtools (websurveys, focus groups, debriefingsessions) inspired by the PDCA circle (Plan, Do, Check, Act) and SWOT analysis (Strong – Weak – Threats - Opportunities) afterany meeting.

  4. WHICH WAY? WHERE FROM AIMS WHO CRITERIA INDICATORS PRIORITIES AND RISKS ORGANISE ACTIVITIES INVOLVE, COOPERATE IMPLEMENT ENDOW, TRAIN, ARRANGE, SUPERVISE COHERENCE PERTINENCE SUSTAINABILITY REVISE DISSEMINATE VALUE EXPLOIT MEASURE REFLECTIVE TOOLS ASSESS >> SWOT STRONG WEAK OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

  5. THROUGH WHICH INDICATORS

  6. WHICH TOOLS • Websurveys >> ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRES (QUANTITATIVE FEEDBACK) • Focus groups • Interviews • Debriefingsessions • Diaries • Blogs • Forums • Audits • Reports QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK TO THE LEARNING PROCESS SELF-GENERATEDFEEDBACKS EXTERNAL EVALUATION

  7. WHICH ACTORS • Internal evaluator (WP5 >> Univda) • External Evaluator (eventually selected by sub-contracting) • Participants to the project: staff, external tutors, trainers, advisers, testimonials involved in the “check” and “do” phases. • Stakeholders and actors involved in the valorisation / exploitation

  8. Thanks! Responsiblefor the localunit PhDDr. and Aggr. Prof. Maria Giovanna Onorati Sociologyof Culture and Communication Departmentof Social Sciences and Humanities Universityof Aosta Valley m.onorati@univda.it

More Related