1 / 10

Projections of extreme indices over Europe from a pattern scaling approach

Projections of extreme indices over Europe from a pattern scaling approach. NCCR WP2 Meeting 05.10.2010. MOTIVATION. IAC ETH. Pattern scaling:. A2. A1B. ?. ?. ?. ?. ?. ?. TIME. No simulations are available Estimate information. ?. ?. ?. MOTIVATION. IAC ETH.

jada-conner
Télécharger la présentation

Projections of extreme indices over Europe from a pattern scaling approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Projections of extreme indices over Europe from a pattern scaling approach NCCR WP2 Meeting 05.10.2010

  2. MOTIVATION IACETH Pattern scaling: A2 A1B ? ? ? ? ? ? TIME • No simulations are available • Estimate information ? ? ? LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  3. MOTIVATION IACETH • GOAL OF THIS PROJECT • APPLICABILITY ON EXTREME INDICES • QUANTIFY AND UNDERSTAND THE LIMITATIONS LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  4. DATA IACETH • ENSEMBLES: 19 regional climate models (RCM) • Spatial resolution: 25km • Daily data (temperature, precipitation) • Transient experiments 1951-2050 or 1951-2100 • Scenarios: A1B LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  5. THEORY IACETH DMI-ARPEGE:1951-2100 SLOPE = SCALING FACTOR Correlation ρ= -0.8346 Annual mean TMEAN(K) Time-Slice Method[Mitchell et al. (2003)] SCALING FACTOR = ΔEXTREMEA1B / ΔXA1B = CONSTANT ΔEXTREME=SCALING FACTOR · ΔX Number of frost days per year (FD) LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  6. RESULTS IACETH 1 Relative error: SMHI HadCM3Q3 Numberoffrostdays (FD) 2021-2050 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 60°N 0 -0.2 45°N -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 30°N 30°W 15°W 0 15°E 30°E 45°E -1 LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  7. RESULTS IACETH Pearson correlation -0.82 1 Lillieforstest (H0) -0.84 -0.86 -0.88 Red: 1980-2009 Green: 2021-2050 Blue: 2070-2099 -0.90 -0.92 0 0 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 Skewness Noviolationofthelinearityassumption But themeanas an estimatorseemstobeproblematic LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  8. RESULTS IACETH 1 Relative error: SMHI HadCM3Q3 Numberoffrostdays (FD) 2021-2050 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 60°N 0 -0.2 45°N -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 30°N 30°W 15°W 0 15°E 30°E 45°E -1 LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  9. CONCLUSIONS IACETH • The skill of the projected extreme indices depends on the… • …Simulated trends • …Bias of the RCM • …Sample length • …Choice of the estimator • …Linearity • Pattern scaling works reasonably well for temperature related extreme indices. • Pattern scaling does not work for precipitation related extreme indices due to no significant/very weak trends in precipitation and/or low signal-to-noise ratio. LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

  10. Future Challenges IACETH • Quantify and understand all sources of uncertainty • Take changes in the variance into account • „Multi-pattern approach“ • Nonlinear pattern scaling approach (e.g. neural networks) • Other explanatory variables (e.g. radiation) or combinations of different explanatory variables • How to combine the different RCMs (Multi-model approach) LUSTENBERGER ANDREAS

More Related