1 / 37

Dark Matter stability and boost factor from DM conversions

This research paper discusses the stability of dark matter and proposes a model with dark matter stabilized by P and CP symmetries. It also explores a scenario for a large boost factor from dark matter conversion. The paper presents numerical results and discusses various models and symmetries related to dark matter stability.

jamesbarr
Télécharger la présentation

Dark Matter stability and boost factor from DM conversions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dark Matter stability and boost factor from DM conversions Yu-Feng Zhou collaborators: Z.P.Liu, W.L.Guo,Y.L.Wu, C. Zhuang Institute of theoretical physics (ITP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). PRD79,055015(2009); PRD81,075014(2010) ArXiv:1008.4479 (PRD), work in progress The second DM/DE workshop, Nov.5, 2010

  2. Outline • Part-I:A model with dark matter stabilized by P and CP symmetries • The stability of DM • A LR model with DM stabilized by P and CP • Phenomenology: relic density & Direct detection • Dark matter decay through tiny C- breaking terms • Predictions for cosmic-ray neutrinos and diffuse gamma rays • Part II:a scenario for large boost factor from DM conversion • Boost factor required by PAMELA/Fermi LAT • Boost factor from late time DM conversion • Numerical results • Simple models.

  3. Symmetries for DM stability • Well known: R-parity, KK-parity, T-parity Kadastik, Kanikel, Raidal 09’, Frigerio and Hambye 09’ • Hidden sector U(1) symmetry • exact U(1) • Broken U(1): a massive Z’, a scalar Ackerman,buckley,Carroll, Kamonkowski 08’ Feng, Tu, Yu 08’, Feng, Kaplinghat, Tu, Yu 09’ Foot etal. 10’ Pospelov, Ritz, voloshin 07’ Gpoalakrishnal,Jung,Wells 08’ Gpoalakrishnal,Lee,Wells 08’ Mambrini 10’ kinetic mixing Higgs portal kinetic mixing

  4. Large SU(2)_L multiplets (minimal DM) • Hidden custodial symmetry vector DM Custodial symmetry SU(2)_C keep vector bosons stable Cirelli, Fornengol, Strumia 06’ Cirelli, Strumia, Tamburini 07’ Hambye 08’

  5. DM in minimal extensions of the SM Extension to SM with scalar DM SM Scalar DM Silveira, Zee, 1985 McDondald, 1994, Burgess, Pospelov & Veldhuis, 2001 Barger,Langacker, KcCaskey, 2007 Shafi, Okada, 2009 He,Li, Tsai, 2007,2009 Extension to LRM with scalar DM Left-Right Model Scalar DM Stability can be protected by P and CP

  6. A LR model with spontaneous P and CP violation • Gauge interaction: Flavor contents • Two bi-doublet required for spontaneous CP violation. • Only one bi-doublet cannot give the correct CP phase P- and CP-transformations

  7. If P and CP are only broken spontaneously After EWSB • S_D does not participate gauge Interactions, as it is gauge singlet • Require that S_D does not develop a nonzero VEV  S_D a DM particle

  8. Scalar interactions Guo, Wu, YFZ, PRD81,075014 (2010)

  9. DM annihilation Main annihilation channels Thermally averaged cross section & relic density

  10. Relic density and direct detection • Parameter space from relic density • Prediction for direct detection rate one bi-doublet case two bi-doublet case Guo, Wang, Wu, YFZ, Zhuang,PRD79,055015(2009);

  11. A special case: large Yukawa couplings to light quarks • Relic density is dominated by heavy quark, not light ones • DM-nucleus scattering is sensitive to light quark Yukawa couplings

  12. DM decay through soft C-breaking terms Guo, Wu, YFZ, PRD81,075014 (2010) • Including soft C-breaking term dominant part: C- and P-even tiny part: C-odd

  13. Decay through left-handed triplet can well explain the PAMELA/Fermi data • Triplets with nonzero B-L number do not couple to quarks through Yukawa interactions • Indirect channels WW, WZ, and ZZ suppressed by tiny triplet VEV required by neutrino masses.

  14. Guo, Wu, YFZ, PRD81,075014 (2010) mass parameters Consider 3 cases with final states dominated by different lepton flavor PAMELA • Explain PAMELA data well. for all type of lepton final states. • mu/tau final states favored by Fermi • tau-lepton final states predict High neutrino-induced muon flux. Fermi

  15. Predictions for up-going muon flux Triplets couple to neutrinos and charged-leptons with the same strength Guo, Wu, YFZ, PRD81,075014 (2010) up-going muon flux can reach the current SK bound

  16. Diffuse gamma-rays LH-III case SH-III case Inverse Compton scattering (ICS) ICS ICS FSI FSI VIB VIB Final state radiation (FSI) Virtual internal bremsstrahlung (VIB) ICS ICS FSI FSI VIB VIB Guo, Wu, YFZ, PRD81,075014 (2010)

  17. Summary of part I • We have proposed a LR model with scalar DM candidate stabilized by C and CP-symmetries. • Tiny DM particle decay is induced through adding tiny soft C-violation interactions. • the DM particle can decay trough SU(2)_L triplet scalars which couple mostly to leptons. • The model predicts large neutrino-induced muon flux for certain leptonic final states. The model also predict new sources for very high energy gamma-rays, favorably in the ~ TeV region.

  18. Boot factor from DM conversions • Part-II Liu, YFZ, Wu, work in progress

  19. The std. WIMP annihilation cross section is too small to account for the PAMELA/Fermi data Positron flux Boost factor The boost factor problem Bergstrom, Edsjo, Zaharijas, PRL103,031103,09’

  20. Possible origins of boost factor Boot factor for DM annihilation • Local clumps Via Lactea II: in subhalo? B~ 4-15, • Temperature-dependent ann. cross section • Sommerfeld enhancement • Resonance enhancement • Non-thermal origin of DM DM may decay rather than annihilate Diemand, et al, 0805.1244, Nature Sommerfeld, Ann. Phy 403, 257 (1931).

  21. The Sommerfeld effect A. Sommerfeld, Annalen der Physik 403, 257 (1931). J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M. M. Nojiri, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 031303 (2004)

  22. Constraints from relic density J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H. B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151301 (2010) Irreducible process

  23. Constraints from relic density J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H. B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151301 (2010) arXiv:1005.4678 • Refined analysis at freeze-out • Cut-off of resonance, recoupling • Force-carrier production & • decay rates • Kinetic decoupling • Self-interaction efficiency, • non-thermality • Other constraints • Halo shape • CMB, protohalo J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger and S. D. M. White, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083502 (2010) M. Kamionkowski and S. Profumo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101,261301 (2008)

  24. Multi-component DM and the boost factor • Multi-component DM • Models with hidden sectors naturally have multi-DM • DM may have SUSY partners • Neutrinos are already (tiny) part of DM • No boost from simply mixed thermal DM • Large boost requires • Large annihilation cross section • Still the correct relic density • Impossible for thermal DM ? For thermal relic

  25. Correlated thermal evolution In the case of interacting multi-component DM • Thermal evolution for interacting DM • Two component case (s-wave) ( Kinetic equilibrium assumed )

  26. The conversion term • The role of • Keep the DM in chemical equilibrium • Convert the heavy DM into the light

  27. Stages of the thermal evolution • Thermal equilibrium • Departure from thermal equilibrium • Late time DM conversion when z is large • Slow conversion characterized by r(z) • Crossing point • Freeze-out after

  28. The boost factor • Evolution of the total density • Late time evolution

  29. Numerical results Large boost factor if mass diff. is small With conversion no conversion B~1000 B~150

  30. Numerical results B vs mass difference B vs relative cross sections

  31. A simple model Add to the SM

  32. Internal degree of freedom cross sections Parameter set Cross sections Boost factors Cross sections & boost factor For near resonance case, all couplings can be smaller

  33. Summary of part II • In multi-DM models, DM conversion can significantly modify the thermal evolution of each DM component. • The relic density of the DM component may not always inversely proportional to it’s annihilation cross section. Through conversions from heavier DM components, the relic density of light DM can be enhanced, leading to large boost factors. • The boost is mostly temperature independent. For generic models with large conversion rate the boost fact can reach ~100-1000. Thank You !

  34. backups

  35. Diffusion eq. Positron signals Sources from DM decay Background

  36. The Sommerfeld enhancement N. Arkani-Hamed, et al, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014(2009) Sommerfeld enhancement factor S:

  37. International Coordinators: Shafi, Qaisar (Delaware), Aprile, Elena (Columbia U.) Wang, Tsz-king Henry(IOP,) Wefel, John (Louisiana State U.) Matsumoto, Shigeki (IPMU), Su, Shu-Fang (Arizona U.) Geng, Chao-Qiang ( NCTS ), Local Coordinators: Bi, Xiao-Jun (IHEP) Ni,Kai-Xuan (SJTU) Yang, Chang-Geng (IHEP) Yue, Qian (Tsinghua U.) Zhou, Yu-Feng (ITP ) KITPC 2011 programDark matter and new physics Sept. 21-Nov. 06, 2011 (7-week)

More Related