1 / 19

Scenario Building

Futures Workshop Turku, 07.06.2006. Scenario Building. Martin Rhisiart Cardiff Business School. What are scenarios?. Scenarios are stories or narratives that portray what might happen, why it might happen, and with what consequences

jana
Télécharger la présentation

Scenario Building

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Futures Workshop Turku, 07.06.2006 Scenario Building Martin Rhisiart Cardiff Business School

  2. What are scenarios? • Scenarios are stories or narratives that portray what might happen, why it might happen, and with what consequences • Scenarios can be very powerful tools to contemplate the range of possible futures that could develop from the influence of key drivers, events and issues.

  3. Definitions • “a tool for ordering one’s perceptions about alternative future environments in which one’s decisions might be played out” (Schwartz, 1996).

  4. Pioneers • Herman Kahn, On Thermonuclear War (1960). RAND – public policy • Pierre Wack – Royal Dutch/Shell; The Gentle Art of Reperceiving” – corporate

  5. Why use scenarios? • Offer a non-linear and dynamic way of thinking • Ability to deal with complexity, to consider multiple variables simultaneously, and with ‘different interpretation’ over time • Counteracts the historical bias of quantitative forecasting approaches • Challenge assumptions

  6. Why use scenarios? (II) • “Scenario thinking, by setting discussions in a time frame beyond their current assignment and beyond facts and forecasts, allows for a discussion with less defensive behaviour and a more shared sense of purpose” (Ringland, 2002)

  7. Why use scenarios? (III) “Within Shell, I think the imperative is to use this tool to gain deeper insights into our global business environment and to achieve the cultural change that is at the heart of our Group strategy.  We face real challenges in the future, we will all need to be able to respond to changing circumstances and make informed and rigorous judgements about our decisions: these scenarios and methodology will help us to do that better.” Jeroen van der Veer (2005), in global scenarios report (to 2025)

  8. Epistemological basis • Work of neuro-biologists suggests that humans are natural scenario-building animals – ability to tell stories about ourselves in the future; cognitive link to speech capacity in the brain

  9. Objectives and main uses • Development of strategy and policy – organisational/spatial • Heuristic device – ‘re-perceiving’ – in organisational change • Stimulate critical thinking, challenge assumptions – within organisations, the general population

  10. Timescale • Varies according to organisational needs, question addressed and themes covered; generally 3-5, 10, 20, even 50 years, e.g. medium-longer term • CIA, Global Trends (2015) • Shell, Energy needs, choices and possibilities (2050)

  11. Synergy with other tools • Scenario building often makes use of other tools, e.g. forecasting/ quantitative; expert opinion; stakeholder opinions etc)

  12. Benefits of using scenarios • Thinking “outside in” – big, external forces • Creating common language and understanding – working across disciplines, departments etc • Organisational alignment to vision • Develop group of people with ability to think strategically

  13. Methodology and implementation • Several scenario building methodologies have been developed • Implementation procedure cited here is a common approach, developed by Schwartz (1996) and Ringland (2002)

  14. Implementation steps • Step 1: Identify the focal issue or decision • Step 2: Key forces in the local environment (microenvironment) • Step 3: Driving forces (macro environment) • Step 4: Rank by importance and uncertainty

  15. Social fragmentation Non-digital isolation Techno-atomisation Digital diffusion Digital desert Non-digital benevolence Digital cohesion New Solidarity Implementation steps • Step 5: Selecting scenario logics

  16. Implementation steps • Step 6: Fleshing out the scenarios • Step 7: Implications • Step 8: Selection of leading indicators and signposts

  17. Implementation procedure • Step 9: Feed the scenarios back to those consulted • Step 10: Discuss the strategic options • Step 11: Agree the implementation plan • Step 12: Publicise the scenarios

  18. How many scenarios? • “Scenarios are not conceived of one at a time. You develop a range of two or three possible futures, allowing you to address an array of possibilities and rehearse your responses to each of them. At the same time, more than four scenarios tend to be too complex: you cannot keep track of their ramifications in your mind” (Schwartz)

  19. Case studies 1. Border, Midland and Western Region, Ireland 2. Countryside Council for Wales

More Related