1 / 21

Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining

Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining. Real Estate Transaction. Basic elements of a distributive bargaining (“DB”) situation: Win-lose, competitive, or distributive nature Strategies emphasize how to increase one’s share of the fixed “pie”

jana
Télécharger la présentation

Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategy and Tactics of Distributive Bargaining

  2. Real Estate Transaction • Basic elements of a distributive bargaining (“DB”) situation: • Win-lose, competitive, or distributive nature • Strategies emphasize how to increase one’s share of the fixed “pie” • Information is given and sought for strategic advantage only • Objectionable? Maybe. Avoidable? No!

  3. Distributive Bargaining:Bargaining Range and Key Points • Target points (goals) • Resistance points (aka reservation points) RPs are most important! • Opening points (initial offers, demands or proposals) • Bargaining range, settlement range, or zone of potential agreement is defined by RPs, and may be positive or negative

  4. Distributive Bargaining Concepts(contd) • Role of alternatives (i.e., BATNA) • Parties usually have option of failing to agree • Those options or alternatives strongly influence RPs, may define them • Settlement point • Each side wants to claim as much of bargaining range as possible, i.e. to claim the “surplus” beyond its RP • Parties must believe they got the best deal possible, or at least a “satisficing” deal; else they seek revenge or back out

  5. Distributive Bargaining Concepts(contd) • Bargaining Mix -- what issues? • Single issue: rare, the exception • Most negotiations involve packages or bundles of positions on a number of issues, making trade-offs possible • Single issues good for illustrating basic concepts, theory, but note that this is an abstraction, atypical

  6. DB: Fundamental Strategies • Four fundamental strategies • Trying to claim as much of the bargaining range (or surplus) for one’s self as possible • Persuading opponent to change RP, thereby shifting the settlement range in your favor • If no positive settlement range initially, persuade opponent to change • Persuade opponent that the settlement offered is the best for them; best they can do

  7. DB: Discovering Opponent’s RP • How low will they go? (Or how high?) • Communication is complex: Recall dilemmas noted earlier re: • Honesty • Trust • Etc. • Each side wants to give, conceal, and get information, and the other side knows it

  8. DB: Changing Their RP • Three key factors • Value they attach to particular outcome • Costs for them of delay or difficulty in negots. • Costs for them of aborting negotiations (failing to agree) • Also, must address their understanding of your situation, perception of what’s possible, and thus the value they assign to outcomes

  9. DB: Changing Their RP (contd) • Four general propositions (assume you’re buyer): • Their RP varies directly with their perception of your cost of delay or aborting negots. • Their RP varies inversely with their cost of delay or aborting negots. • Their RP varies directly with the value they attach to the outcome • Their RP varies inversely with the value you attach to an outcome

  10. Tactical Tasks in DB • Task 1: Assess their outcome values (utilities) and costs of aborting negotiations • Indirect assessment: Try to determine the information they used to set RPs and targets, and how they interpret it • Direct assessment: Not easy given dilemmas, but sometimes they’ll be clear about their outcome values and costs (near a deadline?), and their conduct may provide clues

  11. Tactical Tasks in DB (contd) • Task 2: Manage Their Impression • Screening: Stressed in early stages to gain info on their views; representation more important later (silence is golden; invest in questions) • Concealment is most general tactic, may involve use of “stooges” who can’t reveal info, calculated incompetence, or spokesperson control • Alt strategy: “Snow job” -- bury them in info • Direct actions to alter impressions • Selective presentation • Logical argument to show you discount an outcome • Emotional reactions • Amount of attention, scrutiny, stress or clarification

  12. Tactical Tasks in DB (contd) • Task 3: Modify Their Perceptions • Interpret outcomes: Point out why their favored solution is not so good for them after all • Concealment: Allowing their misperception to continue rather than attempting to correct it

  13. Tactical Tasks in DB (contd) • Task 4: Manipulate Costs of Delay or Termination (Aborting Negotiations) • Disruptive action: Increase their costs of failing to agree • Ally with outsiders who can affect outcomes (e.g., university depts and accrediting groups) • Scheduling of negotiations; power may vary with timing (e.g., seasonal industry), work it to your advantage

  14. DB Positions and Their Roles • Opening offer: Extremes give room to maneuver, signal needs for their concessions, but also risk easy dismissal and can stifle cooperation • Opening stance should be consistent with opening offer; expect reciprocity • Initial concessions convey symbolic messages (e.g., flexibility or firmness) • Role of concessions: Expected, and explicit links to previous concessions are common • Patterns and timing of concessions send signals • Final offer: Can be conveyed explicitly as such or by substantial concession

  15. DB: The Role of Commitment • Signals intent, firmness; exerts pressure • “I can’t move, so you must” • Can involve promises; ongoing credibility requires they be kept (but see next point!) • Plan a way out: sometimes commitments must be abandoned • Help them abandon commitments when it’s advantageous for you to have them move • General rule: You want to appear committed and keep them flexible

  16. DB: Establishing Commitment • Public pronouncements (betting your reputation) • Linking with allies (e.g., overtly contacting an alternative partner) • Increase prominence of demands through formality, repetition, emotional display, etc. • Reinforce threats or promises, possibly act to indicate preparation to implement them

  17. DB: Preventing Their Premature Commitment (To Outcomes You Oppose) • Ignore it • Downplay its significance and firmness • Humor • Changing the subject • “Flinch” • Don’t call attention to it, don’t ask about it

  18. DB: Finding A Way Out(Abandoning Prior Commitments) • New information (had I known ...) • External forces • Public opinion • Pressure from authorities • Broader interests (the public good, peace, etc.) • Reinterpretting (e.g., what was seen as an insignificant concession by them takes on new significance)

  19. Closing The Deal -- Tactics • Provide alternatives -- let them pick • Assume the close -- “Could I have your name and address for the forms … ?” • Split the (unresolved) difference • Exploding or fused offers -- “This offer expires, you must act now!” • Sweeteners -- “And I’ll throw in new deluxe floormats!”

  20. DB: Hardball Tactics(aka Dirty Tricks) • General nature: Coercive, exploiting fears and anxieties. Many consider some or all unethical. Also, they’re dangerous! Can backfire. Not recommended. • Some specific examples • Good guy/bad guy • Highball/lowball • Bogey or decoy • The nibble or afterbite • Chicken • Intimidation or aggressive behavior • Lying, deliberate errors, bluffing, etc.

  21. DB: Dealing With Hardball Tactics • General issues • Important to recognize them and make a strategic response. Don’t let them work. • Optimal response depends on BATNA, timeframe for relationship, among others • Some specific options • Ignore them • Discuss them • Respond in kind • Co-opt the other party

More Related