1 / 14

The Non-Visual Effects of Natural Light on Student Performance

The Non-Visual Effects of Natural Light on Student Performance Alberta Light & Color Study (81-85) Alberta Light Study (86-89) PG&E Daylighting Initiative (1999) Studies reported by NEA Alberta Light & Color Study (81-85) 3 School Study Sites 1. Color & Light School 2. Light School

jana
Télécharger la présentation

The Non-Visual Effects of Natural Light on Student Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Non-Visual Effects of Natural Light on Student Performance

  2. Alberta Light & Color Study (81-85) • Alberta Light Study (86-89) • PG&E Daylighting Initiative (1999) • Studies reported by NEA

  3. Alberta Light & Color Study (81-85)3 School Study Sites • 1. Color & Light School • 2. Light School • 3. Control School

  4. Alberta Light and Color StudySignificant Findings

  5. Albert Light Study (86-89)Five School Sites • Site 1: Sodium vapor light • Site 2: Full spectrum fluorescent , no UV enhancement • Site 3 & 5: Full spectrum fluorescent light, with UV enhancement • Site 4: Cool white fluorescent

  6. Alberta Light StudySignificant Findings

  7. PG&E Daylighting Initiative (‘99) • Correlation between productivity and natural lighting in classrooms • Three school sites selected • Natural light provided by skylighting and windows • Compared students in classrooms with most daylight to those with least daylight

  8. Seattle • Classrooms with largest window area had 9% to 15% higher grades • Skylit classrooms had 6% to 7% higher grades

  9. Fort Collins • There was a 7% improvement in test scores in classrooms with the mostdaylighting • 14% to 18% improvement for students in classes with largest window space

  10. John Ott; 1973(Light as a vital nutrient) • Full spectrum fluorescent light in two first grade classes • Standard cool white tubes in two other identical first grade classes • Used hidden photography to observe classroom activity

  11. What Ott Found Full spectrum fluorescent lights positively impacted: • Behavior • Performance • Academic achievement

  12. Dimininished: • Disciplinary referrals • Absenteeism • Hyperactivity

  13. “… a clear case of daylight robbery.”

More Related