1 / 57

Physics Education in Canada

Physics Education in Canada. Tetyana Antimirova and Pedro Goldman Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Science Ryerson University 2008 OAPT Conference

janine
Télécharger la présentation

Physics Education in Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Physics Education in Canada Tetyana Antimirova and Pedro Goldman Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Science Ryerson University 2008 OAPT Conference 22-24 May 2008

  2. Welcome to Ryerson!

  3. Outline • State of physics teaching • What is PER and PER subfields • Challenges of PEP in Canada due to current funding model and our efforts to change it • Latest Canadian PER initiatives • Physics Education at Ryerson • Looking into the future

  4. Current State of Secondary Science Education in Canada: PISA 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): 57 countries took part in the assessment. Canada came up 3rd! Only students from Finland and Hong-Kong, China outperformed Canadian students in science!

  5. PISA2006 • However, science performance is uneven among the Canadian provinces. • Alberta is significantly better than any Canadian province, while Quebec, Ontario, and BC performed at the average level, and the rest of the provinces performed significantly below the Canadian average.

  6. Challenges for Postsecondary Education • Increasing expectations for student engagement and satisfaction • Meeting the needs caused by changing demographics

  7. Changing Demographics • More people than ever before pursue post-secondary education • Large Classes (100-200 students is a new norm, some classes are up to ~1500 students) • In Ontario: younger population • Too many distractions • Many students are forced to work while going to school

  8. Trends • The transition from high school to university is very painful for many students • Many programs/universities report low graduation rates • The success or failure during the first year is a good predictor of student’s future at the university • Universities invest into lots of resources into first-year intervention to ease the transition (first-year offices, orientation courses, additional free tutoring, etc.) - but many of these measures are mostly subject non-specific • Drastic differences between high school and university in study culture and expectations are not taken into account yet

  9. Ontario Statistics • One out of 6 high school students takes grade 12 physics course • 95% of them pass the course • Overall, much lower success rate is reported in the University introductory physics courses

  10. University Introductory Physics Even by conservative estimates: • Up to 30% of those who attempt introductory physics courses, drop these courses and take them later • Up to 25-30% students fail introductory physics courses in their first attempt • “Minus 15% rule”- For those who pass, the grade is lower by 15% on average

  11. Adjusting to University First –Year Student Survey 2007 at Ryerson: A lower percentage of respondents (64% in 2007 compared to 78% in 2004), reported success with “performing adequately in courses requiring mathematical skills”

  12. General Population • According to various estimates, only between 0.5% and 2% of university population major in Physics • Phobia of physics • The rest: Take required physics courses for engineering, pre- medical, other science programs or have no exposure to physics at all

  13. “The task of the physics teacher today is to figure out how to help a much larger fraction of the population understand how the world works, how to think logically, and how to evaluate science” Joe Redish

  14. “Teaching physics can be both inspirational and frustrating” Joe Redish

  15. What is Physics Education Research (PER)? PER Subfields • Cognitive mechanism • Curriculum and instruction • Epistemology and attitudes • Institutional change • Problem solving and reasoning • Research methods • Socio-cultural mechanisms • Student conceptions • Teacher education and TA training • Effective use of technology in teaching

  16. What Are We Concerned With? • empirical investigations of student understanding • modeling student learning • PER-based curricular materials (development, testing, evaluation, implementation) • PER-based diagnostic instruments and assessments-our research tools

  17. Practicalities: A four-step, Scientific Approach to Teaching • Establish what students should learn • Scientifically measure what students are actually learning • Adapt instructional methods and curriculum and incorporate effective use of technology and pedagogical research to achieve desired learning outcomes • Share findings, disseminate and adopt what works Four-step approach from Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI)

  18. Tools: Using Technology in Science Teaching Interactive engagement in large lectures (Clickers) Using live data collection (sensors and probes, LoggerPro) to provide students with the opportunity to test their ideas about science Using video-based motion analysis Using online computer simulations (PhET) in large lectures as well as in labs, tutorials and homework assignments Using online interactive homework systems, such as MasteringPhysics

  19. Evaluating Impact: Action Research To know where we are going: • Monitoring introduced changes • Pre- and post-instruction testing • Use of standardized conceptual tests for measuring the impact

  20. Science Education Research Groups in Canada

  21. PER in Canada • Unlike the USA, Europe, Australia and Latin America, there are only few Physics Education groups in Canada • All PER initiatives in Canada happen despite the lack of PER funding on national and provincial levels • These initiatives are initiated by individuals, small groups and some universities • PER movement in Canada is building from the ground up!

  22. Science Education Funding in Canada Sc. Ed. 22

  23. Current State of Science Education Funding in Canada NSERC

  24. Latest Development: Lobbying for Funding Model Change • Lobbying for joint committees of major Canadian granting agencies (NCERS, SSHRC and CIHR) to review grant applications in subject-based Science Education Research • Currently the signatures are being collected in the support of the initiative of Dr. M.Milner-Bolotin and Dr. P.Walden.

  25. Looking Into the Future Physics Education Research (as any subject-based science education research) requires consistent funding for research and curriculum development and evaluation, preferably from national granting agencies Subject-based Science education research (PER in particular) should be centered at science departments Science (physics) departments should be involved in the training of science teachers

  26. Despite Current Obstacles… A Few Canadian Post-Secondary Science Education Initiatives University of British Columbia: Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI) - $12 million over 5 years, started January 2006. Funded by the University. University of Toronto: Renovation of Undergraduate Physics Labs (studio-based physics teaching) - funded mainly by the University Alan Slavin’s work at Trent University on Students’ Achievements in Introductory Physics Courses

  27. A Few Canadian Post-Secondary Science Education Initiatives (continued) Ryerson University: Hired two tenure track physics education faculty at the Department of Physics; the scope of our PER-related activities is growing Perimeter Institute initiatives Toronto District School Board (TDSB) involvement with PER University of Calgary: Undergraduate Laboratory project funded by University, includes hiring postdoctoral researcher for PER-Latest development!

  28. Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI) University of British Columbia – Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI) $12 million over 5 years, started January 2006. Funded by the University. Science Education in the 21st Century: Using the Tools of Science to Teach Science Achieving the most effective, evidence-based science education

  29. Undergraduate Physics Labs at University of Toronto • Renovation of Undergraduate Physics Labs (studio-based physics teaching) • 4.7 million • State-of-the-art studio: both space and equipment • Merging laboratory and tutorials, while preserving lectures • Impact study

  30. The Latest! Calgary Initiative • Modernization of Undergraduate Physics Labs • Includes hiring a postdoctoral researcher to conduct PER • 2-year project funded by the University • Impact study

  31. Ryerson Developments • Ryerson University: Hired two tenure track physics education faculty at the Department of Physics (2004 and 2007) • Two more faculty members are involved in PER on a part-time basis • The scope of our PER-related activities is increasing steadily

  32. TDSB Activities • Conferences (for example, “Eureka” in November 2007) • Growing collaboration with Universities • Involvement with OAPT, STAO • Involvement with physics teachers training • Teachers’ professional development

  33. Disclaimer • This is rather a snapshot, not a comprehensive account of physics education in Canada • Only relatively new developments and trends were mentioned • We might be not aware of some of the initiatives taking place • If you happen to know the groups that we did not mention, we would like to hear about them!

  34. Physics Education @ Ryerson http://www.physics.ryerson.ca/ PROGRAMS: ●BSc in Medical Physics ●MSc in Biomedical Physics ●Applied to OCGS for PhD in Biomedical Physics ●Long-term goal: MSc in Science (Physics) Education

  35. Our Faculty • 15 faculty members (10 in Medical Physics, 2 in Physics Education) • Largest university-based Biomedical Physics group in Ontario • Physics Education is designated as our second area of expansion (2 full-time and 2 part-time faculty members) • We believe that we are the only Physics Department in Canada which hired tenure-track faculty for PER

  36. We Teach… • Introductory physics courses for over 800 students in Engineering Programs • Introductory physics courses for over 300 students for Science Program (Medical Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Contemporary Science) • Our typical undergraduate physics classes have lecture section between 100 and 200 students

  37. We Teach (continued)… • Advanced physics courses for our own undergraduate BSc program in Medical Physics • Graduate courses for our graduate MSc program in Biomedical Physics • Several elective courses for Liberal Arts Program (including very popular Astronomy course) • Innovative Course for Architectural Science Program (new!)

  38. Bachelor of Science in Medical Physics at Ryerson University • A new Bachelor of Science in Medical Physics program at Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario was launched in Fall 2006 (first intake of second-year students). • Small at first, but very strong group of students will graduate after Winter 2009

  39. Bachelor of Science in Medical Physics Program at Ryerson University • Beyond first year courses include such topics as radiation therapy, image analysis, medical diagnostics and computer modeling techniques. • In the final year the students undertake an independent, faculty-supervised thesis project in an area of personal research interest.

  40. Our Graduate Programs • Master of Science in Biomedical Physics launched in Fall 2006 • Our own MSc. Students will graduate this summer • Application for PhD program in Biomedical Physics is submitted to OCGS • Tentative plans for Master’s Program in Science Education (starting with Physics Education) fit well with the University’s Academic plan

  41. Our PER-Related Activities Common theme: the impact of new technologies on students learning: • Clickers • Probe/sensor technologies for real-time data acquisition, Logger Pro • Interactive computer simulations (PhET) • On-line tutoring/homework systems (Mastering Physics) • Video-based motion analysis Our Goal: to implement activity-based, inquiry based learning in all our courses

  42. Personal Response Systems • Our Department was instrumental in University-wide adoption of eInstruction clickers in Fall 2007 • Members of our Department piloted clickers in several Physics courses for Science program students in 2005-2006 • Currently clickers are used in several large enrollment physics courses for Sciences and Engineering programs

  43. Our Ongoing PER Activities • Plans for total undergraduate lab renovations (we are still in a fundraising stage) • Implementation of video-analysis assignments (in progress) • Action research in our introductory Physics course for Science programs (pre- and post- testing)

  44. High School Physics Courses Experience and Learning Outcomes in University Introductory Physics Courses The common introductory physics course for all Science Programs (~300 students) at Ryerson combines the students who took Ontario grade 12 high school physics or its equivalent, and those who did not This natural split allowed us to probe how the previous exposure to high school physics influences the learning outcomes in the university introductory physics courses

  45. Science Programs Classat Ryerson • 60% took grade 12 physics course or equivalent • 40% did not • We teach them in one class

  46. 0 128 of 200 Answer Now FALL 2007: Did you take high school physics? • YES • NO (self-identified)

  47. Our Conclusions • Although there are huge variations in individual performance, statistically, the knowledge gap between the two groups (with and without high school physics background) does not shrink after the instruction. • Course dropout rates are significantly higher among the students who did not take grade12 physics or equivalent • The high school exposure to sciences does matter! • We must communicate this information to the students, parents, teachers and high school counselors

  48. Pilot study Impact of Student Major on their Achievement in Introductory Physics • Implement pre- and post testing (FCI, FMCE) • Implement Attitude Towards Science surveys

  49. Experiential Learning • Dr. Marina Milner-Bolotin developed innovative course (PCS107) for first-year students Architectural and Building Science Program • Dr. Carl Kumaradas will introduce project-based small-group learning in our second-year Introduction to Medical Physics course

  50. High School-University Transition Why to collaborate? • Postsecondary and secondary education have similar goals: to provide successful student-centered teaching and learning • Face somewhat similar challenges • Both systems can benefit from sharing experiences and exchanging ideas • Help our students with smooth transition from high school to university

More Related