1 / 41

Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions

7. Organizational Behavior core concepts. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Organizational Behavior, Core Concepts. Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions. Learning Objectives.

javan
Télécharger la présentation

Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 7 Organizational Behavior core concepts McGraw-Hill/Irwin Organizational Behavior, Core Concepts Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Making: How Individuals and Groups Arrive at Decisions

  2. Learning Objectives • Compare the rational model of decision making with Simon’s normative model. • Discuss knowledge management and ways that companies increase knowledge sharing. • Explain the model of decision-making styles and the stages of the creative process.

  3. Learning Objectives • Summarize pros and cons of involving groups in the decision-making process. • Explain how participative management affects performance. • Describe techniques used to improve the quality of group decisions

  4. Models of Decision Making • Decision making • identifying and choosing solutions that lead to a desired result

  5. Models of Decision Making • The Rational Model • logical four-step approach to decision making.

  6. The Rational Model • Identifying the problem • Generating alternative solutions • Selecting a solution • Implementing and evaluating the solution

  7. Rational Model • Identifying the Problem • Problem – exists when the actual situation and the desired situation differ • Generating Solutions • For routine decisions alternatives are readily available through decision rules

  8. Rational Model • Selecting a Solution • Want to maximize the expected utility of an outcome • People vary in their preferences for safety or risk • Ethics should be considered

  9. Rational Model • Selecting a Solution • Evaluating alternatives assume they can be judged according to some criteria • Assumes valid criteria exists • Each alternative can be compared to these criteria • Decision maker actually uses the criteria

  10. Rational Model • Implementing and Evaluating the Solution • After solution is implemented, the evaluation phase is used to evaluate its effectiveness • Optimizing – choosing the best possible solution

  11. Simon’s Normative Model Decision making is characterized by: • Limited information processing • Use of judgmental heuristics • Satisficing

  12. Simon’s Normative Model • Bounded rationality • constraints that restrict decision making

  13. Simon’s Normative Model Limited Information Processing • Tendency to acquire manageable rather than optimal amounts of information • Difficult for managers to identify all possible alternative solutions

  14. Question? What is a rule of thumb that people use to reduce information processing demands? • Decision maker • Judgmental heuristics • Judgmental verdict • Decision conclusion

  15. Simon’s Normative Model • Judgmental heuristics • rules of thumb or shortcuts that people use to reduce information processing demands.

  16. Simon’s Normative Model • Availability heuristic • tendency to base decisions on information readily available in memory. • Representativeness heuristic • tendency to assess the likelihood of an event occurring based on impressions about similar occurrences.

  17. Simon’s Normative Model • Satisficing • choosing a solution that meets a minimum standard

  18. Dynamics of Decision Making • Knowledge management • implementing systems and practices that increase the sharing of knowledge and information throughout an organization

  19. Forms of Knowledge • Tacit knowledge • information gained through experience that is difficult to express and formalize. • Explicit knowledge • information that can be easily put into words and shared with others.

  20. General Decision Making Styles • Decision making styles • combination of how individuals perceive and respond to information

  21. General Decision Making Styles • Value orientation • reflects the extent to which an individual focuses on either task and technical concerns or people and social concerns when making decisions • Tolerance for ambiguity • extent to which a person has a high need for structure or control in his life

  22. Decision Making Styles Figure 7-1

  23. Escalation of commitment sticking to an ineffective course of action too long Escalation of Commitment

  24. Escalation of Commitment Psychological and Social Determinants • Tend to bias facts so that they support previous decisions • Take more risks when a decision is stated in negative terms • Get too ego-involved with the project

  25. Escalation of Commitment Organizational Determinants • Breakdowns in communication • Workplace politics • Organizational inertia

  26. Escalation of Commitment Project Characteristics • Tendency to attribute setbacks to temporary causes that are correctable with additional expenditures

  27. Escalation of Commitment Contextual determinants • Culture of the decision makers • Political climate of the escalation situation

  28. Recommendations To Reduce Escalation of Commitment • Set minimum targets for performance, and have decision makers compare their performance with these targets. • Have different individuals make the initial and subsequent decisions about a project. • Encourage decision makers to become less ego-involved with a project.

  29. Recommendations To Reduce Escalation of Commitment • Provide more frequent feedback about project completion and costs. • Reduce the risk or penalties of failure. • Make decision makers aware of the costs of persistence.

  30. Question? What is the process of using imagination to develop a new process? • Originality • Innovation • Creativity • Resourcefulness

  31. Creativity • Creativity • process of using intelligence, imagination, and skill to develop a new or novel product, object, process, or thought

  32. Stages of the Creative Process • Preparation • Concentration • Incubation • Illumination • Verification

  33. Group Involvement • Minority dissent • extent to which group members feel comfortable disagreeing with other group members, and the extent to which group members participate in decision making

  34. Advantages and Disadvantages of Group-Aided Decision Making

  35. Participative Management • Participative Management • involving employees in various forms of decision making • Setting goals • Making decisions • Solving problems • Making changes in the organization

  36. Group Problem Solving Techniques • Consensus • presenting opinions and gaining agreement to support a decision • Brainstorming • process to generate a quantity of ideas

  37. Rules for Brainstorming • Defer judgment • Build on the ideas of others • Encourage wild ideas • Go for quantity over quality • Be visual • Stay focused on the topic • One conversation at a time

  38. Group Problem Solving Techniques • Nominal Group Technique • process to generate ideas and evaluate solutions. • Delphi technique • process to generate ideas from physically dispersed experts

  39. Group Problem Solving Techniques • Computer-aided decision making • reduces consensus roadblocks while collecting more information in a shorter period of time

  40. Computer-aided Decision Making • Chauffeur-driven systems • ask participants to answer predetermined questions on electronic keypads • Group-driven meetings • conducted in special facilities equipped with individual workstations that are networked to each other

More Related