1 / 21

Three Business Models for Public Access Wireless LANs

Three Business Models for Public Access Wireless LANs. Chris Marsden Annenberg School 19 November 2003 Draft for comments to: ctmarsden@yahoo.co.uk +44 777 926 0376. Case Studies in Property Rights in ‘Free Spectrum’. Academic authors have typically concentrated on:

jdelossantos
Télécharger la présentation

Three Business Models for Public Access Wireless LANs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Three Business Models for Public Access Wireless LANs Chris Marsden Annenberg School 19 November 2003 Draft for comments to: ctmarsden@yahoo.co.uk +44 777 926 0376

  2. Case Studies in Property Rights in ‘Free Spectrum’ • Academic authors have typically concentrated on: • Standards – Lehr & McKnight, Croxford & Marsden (2001) • Spectrum – Cave (2001) • Developing technology in peer networks and mesh networks – Shirkey, Benkler, Lessig (2001-2) Werbach, Sawhney, Sandvig (2003) • This comparative law and economics study is of market developments

  3. LANs and WANs • Wireless public access markets are dominated by licensed oligopolists • Typically voice-dominated – even Euro SMS and DoCoMo Japan have only 10-25% data revenues • WAP was crap, picture messaging stillborn • Hutchinson ‘3’ has 250,000 UK and 500,000 Italian subscribers – Vodafone launching mid-2004 • Verizon launched San Diego and DC October • Video phone and video download not killer applications - yet

  4. What’s different about LANs? • Short range high bandwidth 11Mb\s-54 Mb\s • Mass market for base stations – very cheap • Backhaul on ADSL not dedicated leased lines • dependent on country, e.g. 256Kb/s in Spain, 8Mb/s in Japan, S. Korea, urban Sweden • Security and roaming less advanced • Note holes in WEP but look at USC security! • Standards: single, global, unified, American • WiFi and WiFi5 with 802.11g interim • European standards dormant both HIPERLAN and HIPERLAN2 • Spectrum – messy but workable, and FREE

  5. Economic Case for WLANs • No spectrum cost • Minimal backhaul cost – varies with business case • Minimal base station cost – $400-700 • Seamless networking unnecessary • Data not voice – IP and hotspot use • Network security, roaming and interface IP-based – intelligent device • Device simply add-on to laptop/PDA – corporate user installed base

  6. Case Against WLANs • Extreme short range – in-building effectively • Sharing only 5Mb/s bandwidth in WiFi devices – 20 users maximum • 5Mb/s dependent on premises having multimegabit backhaul – leased line in US, EU • Security still poor for most users • Start-ups have no subscribers or billing • No real alternative to 3G or wire broadband – supplement model

  7. 3 Models:WiFi as 3G Complement • Parameters: • Partnership model • With host locations and 3G networks • Billing and subscriber management • SIM-GSM interoperability • Software integration • User interface • Hardware integration • Security and QoS – VoIP or video capable? • Backhaul costing and integration

  8. Boingo; Classic Aggregator • Earthlink philosophical foundation • Santa Monica: 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard • Start-up with strong VC support & Mitsui, Sprint, Infonet • T-Mobile has 3314 locations in US – 50 in UK! • Claims 5100 hotspots (1900 ‘live’): • 1700 US, 2500 UK, 500 other Europe • but UK agreement is not roaming, just location-finding • 468 California, 75 New York State • 53 NYC, 25 cafes, 19 hotels • 118 UK, 12 Ontario • 47 hotspot partners including Telecom Italia • Earthlink and Fiberlink ISP partners • 3 months free for Centrino laptop purchasers

  9. Boingo – Unique Characteristics • Earthlink model and financing secured • Very California-centric culture • Using network of WiFi enthusiasts for value proposition • Is Silicon Valley duplicable in Santa Monica? • Caffeine addiction and Starbucks focus • Invented here! • Intel and T-Mobile support • Aggregator has roaming but no genuine national let alone international network

  10. Boingo – Transferable Knowledge • Aggregation creates critical mass • First mover advantage • Very solid financial backing • Simplicity focus on end user • Software and systems integrator • Branding of network and hotspots • Boingo in a Box • Additional activities solely to pump-prime market • Verizon and T-Mobile using WiFi to stop DSL churn – so why pay $22 a month for Boingo?

  11. The Cloud – Unique Characteristics • Inspired Broadcast Networks uses gambling ‘fruit’ machine installed base from Leisure Link • 90,000 in 30,000 locations, 12,000 payphones • 3000 hotspots end-2003; 21,000 further orders by end-2006 • Pubs – are European cafes so different? • Critical mass of users creates scale economies • Wholesale unbranded network • Backhaul solution belongs to parent • Expansion into Europe (probably France) • Based on local network and presence

  12. The Cloud – Lessons for Others • Backhaul costs critical • Symbiotic relationship with telco – each is the other’s largest customer • Openzone is biggest retail customer • MyCloud orders 20,000 DSL lines for franchisees • Franchisees see WiFi as ‘add-on’ to basic xDSL need – updating pub quiz games • No branding – black box product • High QoS • Including VoIP to cannibalize 3G revenues • Arguably only BTOpenzone would allow this

  13. KTNespot – Unique Characteristics • World’s most advanced broadband users • Broadband must-have with universal appeal • Triple play with 3G mobile and xDSL • Note regulatory constraints in retail • Backhaul on incumbent parent network • VDSL at 8Mb/s available to consumer • National coverage declared at outset • First mover demolishes competition

  14. KTNespot – Lessons for Others • Leveraging dominance: • Triple play replicable for e.g. Orange, KPN, T-Mobile, DoCoMo in French, German, Dutch and Japanese markets • First mover already used by Swisscom Mobile and Austria Telekom • Focus on low consumer price point requires massive subscription • Difficulty of using terminal equipment holding back subscription

  15. 1. Partnership model -franchisees • Boingo – aggregator = 5100 locations • The Cloud – wholesale network = 20,000 projected • Korea Telecom – integrator = 25,000 • Backhaul – franchisee pays B + C, KT uses parent network • Role of fixed networks – BT as sponsor through BT wifi initiatives

  16. 1. Partnership model - backhaul • Backhaul is highest cost • Base stations ideally require dedicated 11 Mb/s • That in UK costs $50,000 per annum • In South Korea $50 per month • Typically 512Kb/s ADSL – dedicated business lines at $50-100 per month • Franchisee pays…

  17. 1. Partnership model - wireless • Boingo and Telecom Italia • The Cloud and BT, NWP Spectrum • Korea Telecom and regulators – SKMobile • Verizon-Vodafone and Orange – fence sitters • What’s the price point for mobile data?

  18. 2. Billing and subscriber management • Weroam – GSM-SIM authentication from Togewanet ‘clearing house’ • TeliaSonera-Swisscom deal – includes Megabeam UK, WLAN AG, Service Factory, Homerun. • Note – Nespot charges $9 a month above $27 DSL charge – 250,000subs

  19. 3. Software integration • Boingo interface – 24 hour promise • Systems integrator as primary business focus • The Cloud – using: • Service Factory (TeliaSonera interest) • Sun Microsystems – virtual WISP • Nespot – private network only

  20. 4. Hardware integration • Centrino co-operation with all 3 • ‘Boingo in a box’ • The Cloud – ‘My Cloud’

  21. 2004 – Market Developments • National networks in UK and Korea • Centrino chipsets industry standard with critical corporate user mass • 802.11g usable in East Asia and Canada • Requires 50Mb/s xDSL for optimal use • WiFi moving into PDAs • 3G roll-out – will they use hotspots? • Having built the ballpark, will they come?

More Related