1 / 22

Justice and the Conflict Among Principles

Justice and the Conflict Among Principles. Robert M. Veatch The Kennedy Institute of Ethics. The Shortage of Kidneys for Transplant. OPTN database, 2012. Waiting List. OPTN/SRTR database, 2004. Opening Case: Kidney Allocation. 1980s: HLA tissue-typing (efficiency)

jemima-schneider
Télécharger la présentation

Justice and the Conflict Among Principles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Justice and the Conflict Among Principles Robert M. Veatch The Kennedy Institute of Ethics

  2. The Shortage of Kidneys for Transplant OPTN database, 2012

  3. Waiting List OPTN/SRTR database, 2004

  4. Opening Case: Kidney Allocation • 1980s: HLA tissue-typing (efficiency) • 1990s: Time on the waiting list (fairness) • 2011: The “20/80” Proposal (efficiency) • 2012: The absence of fairness

  5. Individual vs. Social Ethics The Hippocratic Ethic: • Benefit the patient and protect the patient from harm • Beneficence and nonmaleficence Autonomy or respect for persons • Nonconsequentialist • Duty-based • Deontological

  6. Ethical Principles for Morality Between Individuals

  7. Ethical Principles for Social Morality

  8. Ethical Principles at the Social Level • Social Utility • Maximizing the aggregate net good from available resources • General units of social utility (utiles) • General units of health utility (QALYs) (Quality-adjusted life years)

  9. Two Utilitarian Worlds

  10. Ethical Principles at the Social Level • Justice • Creating an end-state pattern of distribution of the good

  11. Meanings of the Term “Justice” • Aristotle distinguishes: • Broad sense • Narrow sense • Aristotle’s three end-state patterns • Free birth • Noble birth • Excellence

  12. Modern Egalitarian End-State Patterns • Equality of well-being • Issues in measuring equality of well-being • Subjective vs. objective theories of the good • Preferences • Satisfaction of desires • Objective theories • Equality of well-being and equality of opportunity for well-being • Dworkin: Equality of resources

  13. John Rawls “Relatively Egalitarian” View • Theory of Justice, 1971 • Two principles of justice: • Equal right to basic liberties • Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they provide the greatest benefit to the least advantaged and are consistent with fair equality of opportunity [“the maximin”]

  14. Egalitarian Alternnatives to the Maximin • Prioritarianism • Gives priority to the poorly off • Not necessarily absolute priority • True or “radical” egalitarianism

  15. Three Objections to Egalitarianism • Leveling down • Bottomless pit • Extravagant tastes

  16. Two Final Problems 1. Reconciling the Conflict Among Competing Principles a. Single-principle theories b. Multiple principle theories • Balancing theories • Ranking (lexically ordering) • Primum non nocere • Rawls ‘s two principles • Judaism • Combining balancing and ranking

  17. Combining Ranking and Balancing

  18. Two Final Problems 2. The Clinician’s Role in Dealing with the Principle of Justice (Two Options) • Let clinicians abandon their patients at the margin Problems: • Difficulty in calculating • Requires abandoning patient-centered ethic

  19. Two Final Problems b. Give clinicians an exemption from the principles of social ethics • Permits them to remain loyal to their patients • Requires that other parties do the rationing

  20. Thank You

More Related