1 / 26

MuCh segmentation study

MuCh segmentation study. Anna Kiseleva Dipanwita Dutta Mikhail Ryzhinskiy. Muon simulations. cbmroot release v.APR08 background: UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 A GeV muon magnet all strips STS compact MuCh MuCh hit producer without clusters L1 (STS) and Lit (MuCh) tracking.

jemima
Télécharger la présentation

MuCh segmentation study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MuCh segmentation study Anna Kiseleva Dipanwita Dutta Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

  2. Muon simulations • cbmroot release v.APR08 • background: UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 AGeV • muon magnet • all strips STS • compact MuCh • MuCh hit producer without clusters • L1 (STS) and Lit (MuCh) tracking

  3. Standard segmentation < 5% occupancy for central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV w/o shielding min pad ~ 4 mm2 max pad ~ 20 cm2 Total number of channels: ~ 440 000

  4. Standard scheme (<5% occ.) ███old segmentation scheme ███ implemented in new segmentation procedure

  5. Flexibility of MuCh segmentation procedure • size of pads • size of sectors (number of channels) • number of regions • radius of regions sectors R

  6. Strategy of study • The same pad size for all detector layers • Increase pad sizes without increasing the reconstructed background • Fix pad size for one detector triplet and increase pads in other triplets without increasing the reconstructed background

  7. Segmentation schemes 2. 0.280.28 cm2 22222 33333 3. 0.560.28 cm2

  8. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  9. Segmentation schemes 2 ? ? ? ? 3 0.560.28 cm2 0.280.28 cm2 4 0.560.56 cm2 5 1.120.56 cm2

  10. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  11. Segmentation schemes 2 3 ? ? ? 4 0.560.56 cm2 0.560.28 cm2 0.280.28 cm2 5 1.120.56 cm2 6 1.121.12 cm2

  12. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  13. Segmentation schemes 2 34 ? ? 5 1.120.56 cm2 0.560.56 cm2 0.560.28 cm2 0.280.28 cm2 6 1.121.12 cm2 7 2.241.12 cm2

  14. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  15. Segmentation schemes 2 345 ? 1.121.12 cm2 6 1.120.56 cm2 0.560.56 cm2 0.560.28 cm2 0.280.28 cm2 2.241.12 cm2 7 2.242.24 cm2 8

  16. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  17. Possible solution 1.121.12 cm2 1.120.56 0.560.56 0.560.28 0.280.28 1 600 000 channels

  18. Schemes ███old segmentation scheme new segmentation scheme ███ implemented in new segmentation procedure

  19. Segmentations: • old • fix: • size of pads • size of sectors • R of regions • new • new flexible segmentation procedure of Dipa • R of sectors from old standard • size of pads from table

  20. Comparison of schemes old segmentation (standard) Nchannels = ~440 000 new segmentation (new standard) Nchannels = ~400 000

  21. Results of track reconstruction (Lit) central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  22. Conclusions • Smallest pad size 2.8×2.8 mm2 is sufficient • Number of channels is reduced by 10% with new segmentation scheme

  23. Next steps • Continue of segmentation study using new information about possible detector solutions from workgroup meeting • Implementation of detailed detector geometries for different technologies • Test of realistic muon system by LMVM and charmonium simulationsand trigger • Preparation to the MuCh Technical Design Report

  24. Detectors with pad readout • Lower limit of pad size. Is 0.280.28 cm2 realistic ? • Variations of pad sizes • Support structure & total size of detector layers • Detectors with pad structure in xy or rφ geometry?

  25. Detector technology for last layers • Detector layers 9-15: • position resolution between σ = 3 and 12 mm • additional time measurement • Design including support structure needed for simulations • xy or rφ geometry?

  26. Total detector thickness 18 cm

More Related