1 / 25

The Coffee Paradox: Commodity trade and the elusive promise of development

The Coffee Paradox: Commodity trade and the elusive promise of development. Stefano Ponte Senior Researcher Danish Institute for International Studies spo@diis.dk. The coffee paradox.

jenny
Télécharger la présentation

The Coffee Paradox: Commodity trade and the elusive promise of development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Coffee Paradox:Commodity trade and the elusive promise of development Stefano Ponte Senior Researcher Danish Institute for International Studies spo@diis.dk

  2. The coffee paradox • Presentation based on forthcoming book co-written with Benoit Daviron of CIRAD, Montpellier (Zed Books, 2005) • TOC • Preface • Ch.1: Commodity trade, development and global value chains • Ch.2: What’s in a cup? Coffee from bean to brew • Ch.3: Who calls the shots? Regulation and governance • Ch.4: Is this any good? Material and symbolic production of coffee quality • Ch.5: For whose benefit? ‘Sustainable’ coffee initiatives • Ch.6: Value chains or values changed? • Ch.7: Conclusion

  3. What is the ’Coffee Paradox’? • Contemporary presence of: • a ‘coffee crisis’ in producing countries (lowest international prices in a century in real terms) • a ‘coffee boom’ in consuming countries (specialty coffee, coffee bar chains, coffee is a ‘cool’ drink again) • How can this happen?

  4. The coffee crisis • Factors: • (1) Oversupply • End of ICA (1989) • ’Grow more coffee’ campaigns + structural adjustment • Technical innovation (Brazil, Vietnam) • Is that the whole story?

  5. The Coffee Crisis • Factors: • (1) Oversupply • (2) Oligopoly (market power) • Market liberalisation in developing countries + end of ICA • Government agencies do not control exports anymore • Few global players controlling the market • Buyer-driven value chain

  6. Green coffee market share by international trade company (1998) (%)

  7. Market share of roasting and instant manufacturing companies (1998) (%)

  8. Additional explanations:Stock-price relation (1) • Impact of stocks on price depends on ownership • Which stocks are readily mobilizable? • ICA period: producing country governments controlled stocks – not mobilizable (or strong uncertainty) • Stocks owned by roasters are also ’taken out of the market’ – not mobilizable

  9. Stock-price relation (2) • 1950s-1980s – ICA effect on prices; large stocks, but not available, thus relatively high prices • End of ICA – relation stock-price similar to 1910s-1930s • After 1997 (SMI) – very low levels of stocks, but much of this is available (moves from roasters to traders): no impact on prices • Ownership of stocks counts, in addition to oligopolitic position

  10. The ’coffee boom’ (latte revolution) • Increase in value-added consumption of coffee and coffee-based beverages • Specialty coffee in the US: 17% in volume, 40% value • ’High quality’, single origins, espresso based beverages, fair trade, organics, other ’sustainable coffees’

  11. ’Sustainable coffees’ • Globally, 16,000 tons of certified coffees in 2000 • Up to 52,000 tons in 2003 (approx 0.7% of total volume of traded coffee) • Except for fair trade, relatively low premium paid to farmers

  12. Equity issues: Distribution of value added along the coffee chain – mainstream market

  13. Unit import value for green coffee and gross margin for roasted coffee in the US (1980-2002) (USD/pound).

  14. A different way of telling the story

  15. Are specialty and sustainable coffees scoring any better? • Specialty (as ’high quality’) • R&G sale at Starbucks, USA (Kilimanjaro peaberry) • 4% goes to the farmer • Coffee cup at Starbucks, USA (same kind of coffee) • 1% goes to the farmer • Organic: same as above • Fair trade • Supermarket sale, espresso blend, Italy • 21% goes to the coop (same % as in old ICA system) • Specialty shop, Kili single origin, USA • 11% goes to the coop

  16. What is quality? • Material attributes • Symbolic attributes • In-person services

  17. Material attributes • Quality in producing countries mainly relates to material attributes • Market liberalisation: one price for all coffee – no incentive to farmers • ’Material quality crisis’

  18. Symbolic attributes and in-person services • This is what is sold to consumers in the North • Branding and packaging • Ambience of consumption • Esoticism, good stories • Lifestyle • In-person service (bar, restaurant, specialty shop) • This is where the value added comes from • As long as producers do not control part of this value addition, there will be no way out of the ’commodity problem’ in developing countries

  19. Solutions? (1) • Supply management – I am skeptical • Failure of ACPC cartel • Failure of the ICO CQP to have regulatory bite • Competition policy (to break the abuse of oligopolistic position) – legally tricky • Diversification – difficult to impose as a ’policy’; also, in some areas, there are no alternatives • Improve material quality • Yes, if there are financial incentives (premium) or positive returns – not at present for smallholders • Coordination mechanisms need to be re-established in producing countries

  20. Solutions? (2) • Sustainability certifications? • Still small, but growing • BUT, premium is needed at farm-gate • Lower costs of certification • Consumers need to pay more for getting more • Improve transparency • Labelling rules (indicate type of coffee used, %, origin)

  21. Solutions? (3) • Cultivate consumers, not more coffee • The ’wine route’ • Sell lifestyle, not poverty or development message, to mainstream consumers • Producers need to sell ’symbolic’ quality and control returns from it • Location, esoticism, origin, combination with crafts/music • Limited inroads in in-person service provision (agro-tourism) • Direct marketing, internet auctions • Key: Appellation systems with legal backing; IPR protection • Producer associations built around appellation areas

More Related