1 / 24

Philosophy and Cognitive Science

Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Conceptual Role Semantics Joe Lau Philosophy HKU. Readings. Robert Cummins Excerpts on reserve at main office. Ned Block Online article. “Advertisement for a theory of semantics”, on reserve. Topic. Some closely related theories

Télécharger la présentation

Philosophy and Cognitive Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Philosophy and Cognitive Science Conceptual Role Semantics Joe Lau Philosophy HKU

  2. Readings • Robert Cummins • Excerpts on reserve at main office. • Ned Block • Online article. • “Advertisement for a theory of semantics”, on reserve.

  3. Topic • Some closely related theories • Conceptual role semantics (CRS) • Computational role semantics • Functional role semantics • Procedural semantics

  4. Three questions about a representational system • Which are the representations? • What do the representations mean? • What makes a representation mean what it does?

  5. Q1 : Identifying representations • Which physical properties / states / objects are used to encode information / carry meaning? • Which are the symbols? • Information encoded by single neuron in the brain, or groups of neurons? In what form? • Structured? Pictorial? Linguistic?

  6. Q2 : What do they mean? • Identifying their content / what the symbols represent. • “insalata” means salad in Spanish. • The firing of this neuron represents the boundary of a surface.

  7. Q3 : theory of meaning • Questions that remains even after the meaning of a representation is known. • Given that X means Y, what explains the fact that X means Y? • What is it for something to have a particular meaning?

  8. Q2 Specifically about a system of representation. An empirical question to be resolved by empirical investigations. Q3 A general question about the nature of meaning. A philosophical question about how the concept of representation is to be understood. Comparing Q2 and Q3

  9. CRS • A theory of meaning that proposes an answer to the third question. • Better : a very rough and incomplete framework for answering the third question.

  10. Intrinsic vs. relational properties • An intrinsic property of X : a property that depends only on those properties internal to X. • Example : the mass of an object • A relational property of X : a property of X that depends on objects that exist externally of X. • Example : being a father

  11. Meaning as a relational property • Being meaningful, having a particular meaning are relational properties of representations. • The intrinsic properties of a physical object is not enough to determine its meaning. • The meaning of a representation can change without changing its intrinsic properties.

  12. A unitary theory? • Is there one single theory of meaning that applies to : • meaningful expressions in natural languages • meaningful mental representations

  13. Meaning as covariation • The meaning of a mental representation X depends on what X covaries with. • X covaries with Y = X causally correlates with Y

  14. Example • Hubel and Wiesel : orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex (area V1) • Activity of cells represent the presence of bars or boundaries at a certain orientation.

  15. Criticism • At best : works for “detector” representations that indicate proximate stimulus. • Still : such representations might covary with lots of things. • But not the higher cognitive representations. • Inaccurate covariation • Non-existent covariation

  16. Functional role semantics • Functionalism : Mental states are defined by their functional role. • Role vs. occupant • Intentional mental states are defined by (a) type (e.g. belief) and (b) content (e.g. that snow is white) • So the content of intentional mental states are defined and explained by their functional role.

  17. Functional role = ??? • A relational property; role within the functional organization of the mind • Conceptual role semantics (CRS) • Content defined by the role of a representation in cognition, e.g. reasoning, decision, perception, memory.

  18. Example • Consider these inferential transitions between the beliefs of an agent : • P*Q P • P*Q Q • P, Q  P*Q • Interpretation : “*” represents conjunction (“and”). • Meaning determined by role in reasoning.

  19. Advantages of CRS • Explain differences in meaning despite sameness of reference. • Lee : “I have a lot of money.” • Lee : “Lee has a lot of money.”

  20. Computational-RS • CompRS = CRS + Computationalism • Computionalism : cognition is explained by computations. • Mental content defined by conceptual role  Mental content defined by computational role (role of representation in the mind’s program)

  21. CRS and FRS • CRS is one version of FRS • CRS is true  FRS is true • FRS is true not  FRS is true • There might be aspects of functional role which are not computational. • e.g. role in interacting with some non-computational system.

  22. CRS and covariation • Internal conceptual role might not determine all aspects of meaning. • External causal connections have a role in determining which particular object a representation is about. Tung-1 Tung-2

  23. Two factor CRS • Which is more important? Internal or external factor • Is this plausible? • Internal factor imposes constraints on what the representation can be about • External factor determines which particular object or property is represented. • But perhaps some content is determined entirely by the internal factor (e.g. “and”).

  24. Narrow vs. wide content • Narrow content : content that depends only on what is inside the head. • Wide content : content that depends also on objects outside the head.

More Related