1 / 22

Spatial Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass (ABG) using Remote Sensed Data

Spatial Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass (ABG) using Remote Sensed Data. Bob Pliszka, VP- Operations & Forestry, ImageTree Corporation Advisor - Dr. Wayne Myers, Professor of Forest Biometrics; Director, Office for Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Services September 23 rd , 2008.

jerod
Télécharger la présentation

Spatial Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass (ABG) using Remote Sensed Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spatial Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass (ABG) using Remote Sensed Data Bob Pliszka, VP- Operations & Forestry, ImageTree Corporation Advisor- Dr. Wayne Myers, Professor of Forest Biometrics; Director, Office for Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Services September 23rd, 2008

  2. Background

  3. Geographic Focus Hardwood forests of East Rockhill township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania

  4. Background • Significant increase during the last ~15 years in Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) in the US (and globally) From Environmental Protection Agency website. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads/08_Trends.pdf

  5. Background • Currently there’s an ongoing global effort to reduce GHG levels • In the US, voluntary trading of forest carbon credits • Carbon emitters can purchase “credits” • US working towards a mandatory cap and trade system • Will require an effective means for measuring and mapping biomass levels

  6. Background • Net increase in biomass from year to year is used to calculate CO₂ available for trading • One such example is the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) • Global system, the Kyoto Protocol, only recognizes afforestation credits • One area of focus is the mapping of forest aboveground biomass (ABG) • ABG provides an input into calculations of CO₂ • ABG provides insight into GHG emission levels

  7. Mapping ABG • Traditional ground based forest inventory methods (Brown et al) • Translates directly into forest biomass • (Photo taken from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Website) http://www.fao.org/

  8. Mapping ABG • High resolution imagery (Neilson et al) • Low resolution imagery (Hall et al) • (LiDAR) (Bortolot and Wynne, Van Aardt et al, Patenaude et al)

  9. Mapping ABG • Combination of traditional ground methods and remote sensed data (Brown et al) + = ABG

  10. Mapping ABG • Current commercial ABG solutions are: • Can be less cost effective for small woodlots • Potential lack of incentive for small, non-industrial private owners • Coarse resolution and targeted for large scale; not always optimal for small ownerships • High resolution remote sensed data may help…. • Readily available and current in certain cases • Provides reliable spatial information

  11. Objective and Materials

  12. Objective • Spatially map forest biomass in East Rockhill township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania • Use of both: • Low resolution Landsat imagery (20-30 meter pixel) • High resolution NAIP imagery (1 meter pixel) • Compare and contrast the estimated biomass maps from the two datasets

  13. Materials • Forestry tools • Diameter tape • Clinometer • 10 BAF prism • Misc. • Applicable biomass equations • USDA FIA Data • Arcview GIS software • Remote Sensed Data • Landsat data (30 meter pixels) • National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery (1 meter pixel) • Shapefiles and coverages: • East Rockhill township boundaries • Hydrology layers

  14. Methodology

  15. Methods

  16. Methods • Digitization of forest stand boundaries (homogenous areas) • Classification (forest vs. non-forest, mature vs. young, etc.)

  17. Methods • Collection of low intensity tree measurement data

  18. Methods • For every forested stand • Estimation of tree volume and biomass (per stand basis) for both remote sensed data sets • Quantification of differences • Forested acres • Total estimated biomass • Spatial distribution of biomass • Creation of Thematic Maps and final write up

  19. Timeline & Results

  20. Project Timeline

  21. Anticipated Results • Relative ABG maps for East Rockhill township • Analysis and visualization of estimated ABG differences using high vs. low resolution remote sensed data • Potentially lead to further efforts to develop efficient and cost effective methods for small private woodlot owners

  22. Thank You! Bob Pliszka Sellersville, PA 215-258-2855 rgp108@psu.edu

More Related