1 / 17

Bucharest, 18 February 2009

Evaluation of Structural Instruments in POLAND. Stanislaw Bienias National Evaluation Unit Department of Structural Policy Coordination Ministry of Regional Development. Bucharest, 18 February 2009. Institutional system in Poland. Institutional system.

jess
Télécharger la présentation

Bucharest, 18 February 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of Structural Instruments in POLAND Stanislaw Bienias National Evaluation Unit Department of Structural Policy Coordination Ministry of Regional Development Bucharest, 18 February 2009

  2. Institutional system in Poland Institutional system How dose it look in Poland?

  3. Institutional system in Poland Structure of evaluation system

  4. Institutional system in Poland Resources for evaluation

  5. Institutional system in Poland Accomplished on-going evaluation researches

  6. Institutional system in Poland Position of evaluation in the system? 2006 Evaluation as a legal obligation 2004 Evaluation as a control instrument 2008 Evaluation as a management and accountability information source

  7. Coordination&Networking Coordination&NetworkingCrucial in decentralized system! Evaluation is not a single research it’s a process

  8. Coordination&Networking Coordination&networking instruments • Thematic steering groups (allows for cooperation with monitoring, control and programming units) • Steering Committee (involvement of decision makers) • Evaluation report data base (all evaluation findings in one place) • Evaluation website (main source of information) • Annual OP evaluation plans (complementarity of work) • Annual OP evaluation reports (to know what we achieved) • Annual report on evaluation process (recommendations for the process of evaluation) • Monthly presentation of evaluation findings (sharing the knowledge on evaluation findings) • Close cooperation with monitoring (indicators, IT System)

  9. Steering Committee for Evaluation of the NSRF DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURAL POLICY COORDINATION (NEU) DKS Units Evaluation Unit Steering Group 1: Impact of the NSRF on socio-economic development Steering Group 2: Development and modernisation of infrastructure Steering Group 3: Innovativeness of the economy Steering Group 4: Human resources development Steering Group 5: Regional and territorial development Steering Group 6: Public administration capacity building and the implementation of the “good governance” principle”

  10. Capacity building Capacity building Administration&MarketThe way to ensure quality

  11. Capacity building ADMINISTRATION • Internal trainings • Workshops • Postgraduate studies • Publications • Annual conference • Cooperation with academies* • Cooperation with other Member States • Internal evaluations *”There is nothing as practical as a good theory” – Grzegorz Gorzelak

  12. Capacity building MARKET • Low/realistic tenders selection criteria • Involve people from universities (as consultants or evaluators) • Clear massage: what you expect from the evaluation (assessment greed)

  13. Lessons learned INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Decentralization allows evaluation to be closer to the real problems and answer more relevant and precise evaluation questions. Partnership is needed – the most relevant evaluation questions are not usually asked by people from evaluation units! There is no universal patent for evaluation system!

  14. Lessons learned COORDINATION Coordination is essential: plan, gather and explore information from the whole evaluation process. Treat evaluation as a part of knowledge management system. Without good monitoring evaluation gives weak evidence. Evaluation is to deliver essential information to the proper person in the right moment!

  15. Institutional system in Poland CAPACITY BUILDING Without capacity in administration there is no good quality evaluation findings. You need to develop the capacity not only for evaluation but also for managing the development policy. In evaluation “learning by doing” strategy works! Build your own evaluation market. It is cheaper and in longer perspective you develop your own national capacity for policy making!

  16. Challanges for evaluation • Crucial role in delivering the evidence on the efficiency and effectiveness of cohesion policy (2013+ debate) • Better use of evaluation results in programme management • Improvement of methodology (impact evaluation/ theoretical base) • Improvement of the monitoring system • Building the capacity for evaluation in national policies Evaluation is not the end in itself.Evaluation must foster the implementation of the strategy!

  17. Thank you for your attention! Stanislaw.Bienias@mrr.gov.pl Ministry of Regional Developmentul. Wspólna 2/4www.mrr.gov.plwww.ewaluacja.gov.pl

More Related