Peer Led Simulation

1. Peer Led Simulation Tracey Valler Richard Standage Lucy Kelsall-Knight. University of Birmingham

2. Simulation • Simulation is an established component of nurse education. • It has the dual benefits of easing the pressure on clinical placements (Opton et al 2014) and providing a safe environment to learn and develop clinical skills and decision making (Cant and Cooper 2017). • A more innovative aspect of this technique is student led simulation (Valler-Jones 2014).

3. Peer Led Simulation • As part of the Children’s Critical Care module in the Bachelor of Nursing programme at the University of Birmingham, student led simulation were used as a way of facilitating students to learn some of the module content and giving them hands on practice of clinical skills in a safe environment. • This is a continuation of a study by Valler-Jones (2014)

4. Children’s Critical Care Module • The module content covers the management and care of neonates, children and young people in high dependency and critical care settings. • Typical conditions include prematurity, organ dysfunction, trauma and head injury, respiratory compromise or failure, sepsis, thermal injuries or other potentially life threatening illnesses or events.

5. Peer Led Simulation Students were divided into groups of 5/6 to; • Devise a detailed clinical scenario based on a condition of their choice. • Plan the nursing interventions required to manage the patient in their scenario, based on current evidence and recommended best practice. • Include any medical equipment that would be needed to assess and manage the patient.

6. Peer Led Simulation • Each group facilitated their own clinical simulation for another group, providing prompts to enable them to respond to the situation and manage the child as appropriate • The group not involved in that simulation observed and provided feed back. • All students had the opportunity to facilitate, be facilitated and provide feedback • All scenarios were supervised by a member of the academic team to ensure adherence to safe, effective practice.

7. Evaluation • Based on Module evaluation, Pre and Post Intervention questionnaire and single and focus group interviews over last 7 years (N= 123 students) • Largely positive. • Some themes from data (relating to PLS and not simulation overall) • Confidence • Learning from Peers/Team Working • Knowledge base and Research skills • Anxiety/Stress

8. Free Comments. Confidence Increased my confidence as it enabled me to revisit areas and reinforce the knowledge that was there • Competent but still a lot to learn

9. Free Comments. Learning from Peers Helped develop my assessment of patients The groups chose different scenarios which increased overall knowledge Understand more of the care needs of high dependency patients. I didn’t get anxious as you are with your peers and everyone knows different bits of information so they are there to support you and can provide information Still require ‘real life’ practice to be fully competent. Beneficial to practice in a safe environment

10. Free Comments. Team working Able to further develop team working skills by negotiating tasks. Doing more sessions like this would have had a positive effect on team working. Working as a team has helped me collate my knowledge and ideas. We are all there for each other. It was not a competition

11. Feedback. Knowledge and Research “All groups had to prepare using policies/guidelines and research”. We all had different experiences and knowledge but it also meant they went and researched further into this to catch up. The experience was shared “Researching the scenario meant I read lots of research papers which strengthened my evidence based practice”.

12. Free Comments. Anxiety/Stress What if I let my group down? As a group you supported each other so that made it easier but definitely stressful nervewracking You are expert of that simulation so expectation is high. It was dramatic. We were dramatic!

13. Conclusions/recommendations • Valued and appreciated by students. • Multiple benefits to clinical skills and life long learning • Enabled them to apply the taught theoretical components of the module. • More or longer sessions would have enhanced their learning to a greater extent. • Incorporate into future iterations of module.

14. References • Cant, R.P. and Cooper, S.J. (2017) Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review, Nurse Education Today, 49, pp. 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015. • Opton, L., Wilkinson, C., and Davenport, L. (2014). Student-developed simulations: an innovative approach to teaching and learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, e103-e106. • Valler-Jones, T. (2014). The impact of peer-led simulations on student nurses. British Journal of Nursing, 23(6), p321-326