1 / 32

Panel Discussion on Parcels and Act 20 Requirements

Panel Discussion on Parcels and Act 20 Requirements. Mike Friis and Peter Herreid Department of Administration Howard Veregin and Codie See State Cartographer’s Office. WLIA Spring Regional Meeting June 5, 2014. Panel Overview. Act 20 in brief

jimbo
Télécharger la présentation

Panel Discussion on Parcels and Act 20 Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panel Discussion on Parcels and Act 20 Requirements • Mike Friis and Peter Herreid • Department of Administration • Howard Veregin and Codie See • State Cartographer’s Office WLIA Spring Regional Meeting June 5, 2014

  2. Panel Overview • Act 20 in brief • LinkWISCONSIN EBM Parcel Mapping Project • Version 1 Statewide Parcel Map Database Project • Planning Process Framework Document • Discussion

  3. Overview of the EBM Project

  4. What is the EBM project? • Objective is to create statewide address and parcel layers from local-level data • Funded by the PSCW through the ARRA • To serve various needs in broadband mapping activities at the PSCW

  5. Building off of “Just do it”

  6. Timeline of EBM

  7. 100% Participation

  8. Call for Municipal data Parcels: 39 Jurisdictions

  9. Call for Municipal data Address Points: 49 Jurisdictions …7 Jurisdictions missing parcels & address points For More, see our interactive progress map: http://maps.sco.wisc.edu/EBM/progress.html

  10. EBM as a Segue to V1 Parcels • Infrastructure for data Submission • Data assessment and organization • GIS tools and technical workflows • Jurisdiction-specific knowledge Lessons from EBM can be directly applied to VI and improved upon

  11. Overview of the V1 Project

  12. What is the V1 project? • Part of Statewide Parcel Initiative mandated by Act 20 • Help counties meet Act 20 requirementsfor online parcel info • Will produce Wisconsin’s first public statewide digital parcel map • Partnership between DOA and SCO, collaboration with local governments

  13. EBM vs. V1

  14. V1 Deliverables Statewide parcel database • Aggregated from county and municipal data • To include attributes required by statute • Assessment data • Zoning • Addresses • Acreage Set of final reports • Methods used • Recommendations for standards • Benchmarking

  15. Out of V1 Scope for SCO • Data hosting • Data updates • Filling in gaps • Coordinate manipulation (e.g., rubber sheeting) • Resolving boundary discrepancies • Prioritization of investments/allocation of WLIP funds • Create governance structure to implement standards

  16. Timetable

  17. Benefits • Help counties meet Act 20 requirements • Help DOA advance Statewide Parcel Initiative • Create the first public, statewide, digital parcel map for Wisconsin

  18. Benefits (cont’d) • Meet business needs for statewide parcels from government, academia, private sector, non-profits… • Enhance ROI for GIS infrastructure and WLIP funding by putting data to work • Develop standards and methods for data exchange

  19. Benefits (cont’d) • Develop benchmarks to prioritize improvement efforts • Enhance working relationships between local and state governments • Model successful statewide integration effort for future projects

  20. Benefits (cont’d) • Improve Wisconsin’s position nationwide http://www.nsgic.org/gma-2013/ • 15 states have a statewide parcel layer >95% complete • 14 states make the layer available to the public • 21 states have a program to collect local parcel data • 25 states have a designated parcel steward

  21. Planning Process Framework Document

  22. Benchmarks Standard or level on a specific measure of data quality for a particular dataset Statewide objectives  Benchmarks  County assessment  Funding priorities Objective: Complete parcel digitization Benchmark: County digital parcel datasets 100% complete Assessment: County X is 90% complete Funding: Completion of dataset is County X’s top strategic initiative funding priority

  23. Benchmarks Short-term: Metrics to assess completeness of digital parcel attributes for s. 59.72(2)(a) Long-term: Metrics to assess quality and completeness of county parcel datasets beyond s. 59.72(2)(a): • Completeness of digitization • Currentness • Attribute completeness based on national standard • Attribute accuracy • Positional accuracy • Topological consistency

  24. Appr. 166 Expenses

  25. Distribution of Funding

  26. Timeline

  27. Outreach

  28. To Be Determined . . . Other DOA Duties Under s. 16.967(3) • How DOA might serve as the state clearinghouse for access to land info • How DOA might maintain and distribute an inventory of land info available for the state • How DOA might prepare guidelines to coordinate the modernization of land records and land info systems Future Communications • State agency/other stakeholder surveys and outreach • 2015-16 county land information plan updates • Future versions of statewide parcel map database and Implementation Plan for long-term development • Data sharing requirements of WLIP grant agreements

  29. Planning Process Framework

  30. Thank You Mike Friis michael.friis@wisconsin.gov Howard Veregin veregin@wisc.edu

More Related