1 / 38

The North Atlantic − The NAO, AO and the MJO

The North Atlantic − The NAO, AO and the MJO. Hai Lin Meteorological Research Division, Environment Canada Workshop “Sub-seasonal to Seasonal Prediction” Met Office, Exeter, Dec. 1-3, 2010. Outlines. Challenge of prediction in the North Atlantic and Europe

jklinger
Télécharger la présentation

The North Atlantic − The NAO, AO and the MJO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The North Atlantic − The NAO, AO and the MJO Hai Lin Meteorological Research Division, Environment Canada Workshop “Sub-seasonal to Seasonal Prediction” Met Office, Exeter, Dec. 1-3, 2010

  2. Outlines • Challenge of prediction in the North Atlantic and Europe • Brief introduction of NAO / AO and its impact • NAO prediction on intraseasonal time scale MJO contribution; intraseasonal hindcast • NAO seasonal prediction possible signal sources; skill in four Canadian AGCMs

  3. Challenge of subseasonal and seasonal prediction in the North Atlantic and European region • Strong variability due to atmospheric internal nonlinear interactions • Far from major source of interannual variability (e.g., ENSO) • Low forecast skill

  4. What is the NAO? The North Atlantic Oscillation is a large-scale seesaw in atmospheric mass between the subtropical high-pressure system over the Azores Islands and the subpolar low-pressure system over Iceland. (From American Museum of Natural History website)

  5. The NAO • The NAO is one of the most important modes of atmospheric variability in the northern hemisphere • The NAO has a larger amplitude in winter than in summer • The NAO accounts for 31% of the variance in winter surface air temperature north of 20°N (Hurrell, 1995)

  6. The AO • The Arctic Oscillation has a global scale, more zonally symmetric, also called the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) • Connection to stratosphere (e.g., Baldwin and Dunkerton 2001) • The NAO can be regarded as a local representation of the AO in the North Atlantic

  7. Impact of the NAO • Subtropical high pressure and Icelandic low • Westerly winds and storm activity across the Atlantic Ocean • Temperature and precipitation in Europe, northeastern Canada and Greenland • Impact on forecast skill

  8. How is the NAO variability generated? • Causes within the atmosphere: interactions among different scales and frequencies in the atmosphere lack of forecast skill beyond 2 weeks • Causes external to the atmosphere (on seasonal and interannual time scales): • Sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly in the North Atlantic • Changes in ice and snow cover • SST anomaly in the tropics

  9. NAO forecasts • Intraseasonal time scale impact of the MJO

  10. The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) • Discovered by Madden and Julian (1971). Spectrum analysis of 10 year record of SLP at Canton, and upper level zonal wind at Singapore. Peak at 40-50 days. • Dominant tropical wave on intraseasonal time scale • 30-60 day period, wavenumber 1~3 • propagates eastward along the equator (~5 m/s in eastern Hemisphere, and ~10 m/s in western Hemisphere) • Organizes convection and precipitation

  11. Composites of tropical Precipitation rate for 8 MJO phases, according to Wheeler and Hendon index. Xie and Arkin pentad data, 1979-2003

  12. Connection between the MJO and NAO NAO index: pentad average MJO RMMs: pentad average Period: 1979-2003 Extended winter, November to April (36 pentads each winter)

  13. Lagged probability of the NAO indexPositive: upper tercile; Negative: low tercile (Lin et al. 2009)

  14. Tropical influence Z500 anomaly (Lin et al. JCLIM, 2009)

  15. Impact on Canadian surface air temperature Lagged winter SAT anomaly in Canada (Lin et al. MWR, 2009)

  16. Why the response to a dipole heating is the strongest ? To demonstrate this: • Primitive equation GCM (T31, L10) • Linear integration, winter basic state • with a single center heating source • Heating at different longitudes along the equator from 60E to 150W at a 10 degree interval, 16 experiments • Z500 response at day 10 • Barotropic instability of 2-D basic flow: similar mechanism as Simmons et al. (1983) • Rossby wave generation determined by relative position of tropical forcing wrt jet stream (Lin 2010)

  17. Day 10 Z500 linear response Similar pattern for heating 60-100E a) 80E b) 110E Similar pattern for heating 120-150W c) 150E Lin et al. (2010)

  18. ISO hindscast with GEM • GEM clim of Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC)-- GEMCLIM 3.2.2, 50 vertical levels and 2o of horizontal resolution • 1985-2008 • 3 times a month (1st, 11th and 21st) • 10-member ensemble (balanced perturbation to NCEP reanalysis) • NCEP SST, SMIP and CMC Sea ice, Snow cover: Dewey-Heim (Steve Lambert) and CMC • 45-day integrations

  19. NAO forecast skillextended winter – Nov – Marchtropical influence A simple measure of skill: temporal correlation of NAO index btw forecast and observations

  20. (Lin et al. GRL, 2010)

  21. (Lin et al. GRL, 2010)

  22. (Lin et al. GRL, 2010)

  23. Correlation skill: averaged for pentads 3 and 4

  24. Correlation skill: averaged for pentads 3 and 4 (Lin et al. GRL, 2010)

  25. NAO seasonal forecasts Possible signal sources: • Sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly in the North Atlantic (e.g., Rodwell et al. 1999) • Changes in ice and snow cover (e.g., Cohen and Entekhabi 1999) • SST anomaly in the tropics (e.g., Jia et al. 2008)

  26. Historical forecast (HFP2) • 4 global modelsGEM: 2°x2°, 50 levels AGCM2: 625 km (T32), 10 levels AGCM3: 315 km (T63), 32 levels SEF: 210 km (T95), 27 levels • Once a month (beginning of each month) • 4-month integrations • 10 members each model • Persistent SST anomaly • Sea ice and snow cover anomalies relaxed to climatology • 1969-2003

  27. NAO seasonal forecast skill • Lead=0: skill in late winter to spring • Four models have similar performance • Lead=1 month: no skill Possible explanation: • skill comes from initial condition • models do not have a correct response pattern in the NAO (this will be explored in the next couple of slides)

  28. Identify dominant forced patterns For the DJFM run: SVD analysis between November tropical Pacific SST and DJF or JFM ensemble mean Z500 The expansion coefficient of SVD2 (Z500) is significantly correlated with the observed NAO index

  29. Leading pairs of SVD in observations November SST vs JFM z500 Z500 SST

  30. Leading pairs of SVD in GEM ensemble mean November SST vs JFM z500

  31. Leading pairs of SVD in GCM3 ensemble mean November SST vs JFM z500

  32. NAO skill of ensemble forecast Temporal correlation with DJF observed NAO index Lead = 0

  33. NAO skill of ensemble forecast Temporal correlation with JFM observed NAO index Lead = 1 month

  34. NAO skill of ensemble forecast • Model has a biased NAO pattern • The forced SVD2 pattern has a time evolution that matches well the observed NAO index  can be used as a skillful forecast of the NAO index

  35. Summary • Significant impact of the MJO on the NAO • NAO intraseasonal forecast skill influenced by the MJO • Some skillful NAO seasonal forecast possible in late winter and spring • Seasonal forecast of NAO has biased spatial pattern, some statistical post-processing procedure can improve the skill

More Related