1 / 13

Inertial Confinement Fusion and Applied Mathematics

Inertial Confinement Fusion and Applied Mathematics. David Starinshak PhD Student, Applied Mathematics University of Michigan Department of Mathematics Advisor: Brian Spears Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Outline. Background National Ignition Facility

jnicholes
Télécharger la présentation

Inertial Confinement Fusion and Applied Mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inertial Confinement Fusion and Applied Mathematics David Starinshak PhD Student, Applied Mathematics University of Michigan Department of Mathematics Advisor: Brian Spears Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  2. Outline Background • National Ignition Facility • Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) My Project in a Nutshell • Problem Statement • Geometric Interpretation Other Projects Relevant to AIM

  3. National Ignition Facility Multi-billion dollar program by Department of Energy to achieve world’s first fusion reaction

  4. National Ignition Facility

  5. Inertial Confinement Fusion • Millimeter-sized capsule of frozen deuterium and tritium (DT) • X-ray energy compresses capsule by factor of 30 • Temperatures exceed 10,000 Kelvin • Pressure reaches 1 billion atmospheres • DT fuses into helium, releasing ~18 MJ of energy • All happens in < 20 nanoseconds

  6. Problem Statement X-ray Image Features Experimental Parameters - Laser power - Capsule roughness - Doping concentration Target radius Peak width Contour RMS … … {velocity, mass} Nuclear Features Quantities like implosion velocity, mass, entropy, and temperature can characterize a successful experiment HOWEVER Such quantities cannot be measured directly from observations Can we understand the state of an experiment from observations? Which observations are most informative in making a distinction?

  7. Problem Statement X-ray Image Features Experimental Parameters - Laser power - Capsule roughness - Doping concentration Target radius Peak width Contour RMS … … {velocity, mass} Nuclear Features Scaled Problem 3 parameters instead of 200+ • Capsule thickness • Ablator density • Ablator opacity  

  8. Problem Statement X-ray Image Features Experimental Parameters - Laser power - Capsule roughness - Doping concentration Target radius Peak width Contour RMS … … {velocity, mass} Nuclear Features Scaled Problem 1D simulations • Unclassified hydrodynamic code HYDRA • Simulates laser-driven implosion and (possible) nuclear burn • 4000+ runs

  9. Problem Statement X-ray Image Features Experimental Parameters - Laser power - Capsule roughness - Doping concentration Target radius Peak width Contour RMS … … {velocity, mass} Nuclear Features Scaled Problem Yorick Postprocessing • Images simulated using Abel Transform • Images processed into discrete set of features • Nuclear features calculated

  10. Geometric Interpretation • Important Questions • Do different classifications cluster in the space of observations? • Can classifications be separated in feature space? • How many features are needed? • Which are the most informative?

  11. Image Processing Problems • Extracting information from noisy X-ray radiograms • Implementing fast variational methods to filter, de-noise, and detect edges • Reconstruct 3D picture of imploding capsule from multiple, time-resolved 2D images

  12. Fluid Dynamics Problems • Numerical approximations for extreme plasma dynamics • Theoretical and applied analysis of turbulent mixing • Fluid interface instability problems (Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz) • Nonlinear analysis of dynamic instabilities

  13. Theoretical and Applied CS • Machine learning algorithms • Data mining and Bayesian analysis • Feature selection and feature engineering • Efficient numerical methods for non-conservation problems • diffusion, convection, neutron transport, etc Training Data BT < 18.4 ns 18.4 < BT < 18.8 BT > 18.8 ns Im_max < 4 4 < Im_max < 6 6 < Im_max < 8 Im_max > 8 Min_var = 0 Min_var ≠ 0 Min_var = 0 Min_var ≠ 0

More Related