1 / 6

Working Architects Group HiEd IT Architecture

Working Architects Group HiEd IT Architecture. Update #3 Harvard CSG 9/23/2004. Today’s Discussion. Third time around First – established the affinity Second – explored architecture and architect Today Recap the WAG agenda Update from MIT Discussion

joanmartin
Télécharger la présentation

Working Architects Group HiEd IT Architecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Architects GroupHiEd IT Architecture Update #3 Harvard CSG 9/23/2004

  2. Today’s Discussion • Third time around • First – established the affinity • Second – explored architecture and architect • Today • Recap the WAG agenda • Update from MIT • Discussion • CIO Perspective: Incorporating Architecture Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004

  3. Structure of the WAG Agenda • On the Topic: Common Issues, Range of Motion • Motivation, Integration, Results • Models, Definitions, Artifacts • Roles, Perspectives, Interactions • Methods, Processes, Tools • In the Topic: Technical Discussions • Consideration/collaboration on 'architecture issues‘ • Leverage a larger architecture group to discuss issues • Compose/share recommendations • For the Topic: Structure/Activities of the WAG • Communication, Outreach, Expansion, Focus Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004

  4. MIT Perspective

  5. CIO Perspective: Incorporating Architecture • What’s missing? What gap is there that I see architecture filling? • What form will it take? Is it a perspective, a roadmap, a list of tools/methods, a set of opinions, and/or a set of people? Does it deal with questions of today, tomorrow, or infinity? • How will I incorporate it? Perspectives must be consulted, roadmaps must be read, tools must be used, opinions must be discussed, people need to interact... What actions do I foresee using to incorporate the architecture forms into the planning and operation of my organization? Harvard CSG - 9/23/2004

  6. Working Architects GroupHiEd IT Architecture Update #3 Harvard CSG 9/23/2004

More Related