1 / 27

S TATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELS FOR CROATIAN WEATHER - DOMAIN CORPUS

S TATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELS FOR CROATIAN WEATHER - DOMAIN CORPUS. Lucia Načinović, Sanda Martinčić-Ipšić and Ivo Ipšić Department of Informatics, University of Rijeka lnacinovic, smarti, ivoi @inf.uniri.hr. Introduction.

joelle
Télécharger la présentation

S TATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELS FOR CROATIAN WEATHER - DOMAIN CORPUS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STATISTICALLANGUAGEMODELSFORCROATIANWEATHER-DOMAINCORPUS Lucia Načinović, Sanda Martinčić-Ipšić and Ivo Ipšić Department of Informatics, University of Rijeka lnacinovic, smarti, ivoi @inf.uniri.hr

  2. Introduction Statistical language modelling estimates the regularities in natural languages the probabilities of word sequences which are usually derived from large collections of text material Employed in: Speech recognition Optical character recognition Handwriting recognition Machine translation Spelling correction ...

  3. N-gram language models The most widely-used LMs Based on the probability of a word wn given the preceding sequence of words wn-1 Bigram models (2-grams) determine the probability of a word given the previous word Trigram models (3-gram) determine the probability of a word given the previous two words

  4. Language model perplexity The most common metric for evaluating a language model - probability that the model assigns to test data, or the derivative measures of : cross-entropy perplexity

  5. Cross-entropy • The cross-entropy of a model p(T) on data T: • WT-the length of the text T measured in words

  6. Perplexity • The reciprocal value of the average probability assigned by the model to each word in the test set T • The perplexity PPp(T) of a model - related to cross-entropy by the equation • lower cross-entropies and perplexities are better

  7. Smoothing Data sparsity problem N-gram models - trained from finite corpus some perfectly acceptable N-grams are missing: probability=0 Solution – smoothing techiques adjust the maximum likelihood estimate of probabilities to produce more accurate probabilities adjust low probabilities such as zero probabilities upward, and high probabilities downward

  8. Smoothing techniques used in our research Additive smoothing Absolute discounting Witten-Bell technique Kneser-Nay technique

  9. Additive smoothing one of the simplest types of smoothing we add a factorδ to every count: δ (0< δ ≤1) Formula for additive smoothing: V - the vocabulary (set of all words considered) c - the number of occurrences values of δ parameter used in our research: 0.1,0.5 and 1

  10. Absolute discounting When there is little data for directly estimating an n-gram probability, useful information can be provided by the corresponding (n-1)-gram Absolute discounting - the higher-order distribution is created by subtracting a fixed discount D from each non-zero count: Values of D used in our research: 0.3, 0.5, 1

  11. Witten-Bell technique • Number of different words in the corpus is used as a help at determing the probability of words that never occur in the corpus • Example for bigram:

  12. Kneser-Nay technique • An extension of absolute discounting • the lower-order distribution that one combines with a higher-order distribution is built in a novel manner: • it is taken into consideration only when few or no counts are present in the higher-order distribution

  13. Smoothing implementation • 2-gram, 3-gram and 4-gram language models were built • Corpus: 290 480 words • 2 3981-grams, • 18 6942-grams, • 23 0213-gramsand • 29 7364-grams • On each of these modelsfour different smoothing techniques were applied

  14. Corpus • Major part developed from 2002 until 2005 and some parts added later • Includes the vocabulary related to weather, bio and maritime forecast, river water levels and weather reports • Devided into 10 parts • 9/10 used for building language models • 1/10 used for evaluating those models in terms of their estimated perplexities

  15. Results given by the perplexities of LM-s

  16. Conclusion • In this paper we described the process of language model building from the Croatian weather-domain corpus • We built models of different order: • 2-grams • 3-grams • 4-grams

  17. Conclusion • We applied four different smoothing techniques: • additive smoothing • absolute discounting • Witten-Bell technique • Kneser-Ney technique • We estimated and compared perplexities of those models • Kneser-Ney smoothing technique gives the best results

  18. Further work • Prepare more balanced corpus of Croatian text and thus build more complete language model • Other LM • Class based • Other smoothing techniques

  19. STATISTICALLANGUAGEMODELSFORCROATIANWEATHER-DOMAINCORPUS Lucia Načinović, Sanda Martinčić-Ipšić and Ivo Ipšić Department of Informatics, University of Rijeka lnacinovic, smarti, ivoi @inf.uniri.hr

  20. References • Chen, Stanley F.; Goodman, Joshua. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modelling. Cambridge, MA: Computer Science Group, Harvard University, 1998 • Chou, Wu; Juang, Biing-Hwang. Pattern recognition in speech and language processing. CRC Press, 2003 • Jelinek, Frederick. Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998 • Jurafsky, Daniel; Martin, James H. Speech and Language Processing, An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000 • Manning, Christopher D.; Schütze, Hinrich. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999 • Martinčić-Ipšić, Sanda. Raspoznavanje i sinteza hrvatskoga govora konteksno ovisnim skrivenim Markovljevim modelima, doktorska disertacija. Zagreb, FER, 2007 • Milharčič, Grega; Žibert, Janez; Mihelič, France. Statistical Language Modeling of SiBN Broadcast News Text Corpus.//Proceedings of 5th Slovenian and 1st international Language Technologies Conference 2006/Erjavec, T.; Žganec Gros, J. (ed.). Ljubljana, Jožef Stefan Institute, 2006 • Stolcke, Andreas. SRILM – An Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit.//Proceedings Intl. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing. Denver, 2002, vol.2, pp. 901-904

  21. SRILM toolkit Modeli su građeni i evaluirani pomoću SRILM alata http://www.speech.sri.com/projects/srilm/ ngram-count –text TRAINDATA –lm LM ngram –lm LM –ppl TESTDATA

  22. Language model • Speech recognition – converting an acoustic signal into a sequence of words • Through language modelling, the speech signal is being statistically modelled • Language model of a speech estimates probability Pr(W) for all possible word strings W=(w1, w2,…wi).

  23. System diagram of a generic speech recognizer based on statistical models

  24. Bigram language models (2-grams) Central goal: to determine the probability of a word given the previous word Trigram language models (3-grams) Central goal: to determine the probability of a word given the previous two words The simplest way to approximate this probability is to compute: -This value is called the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate

  25. Linear interpolation - simple method for combining the information from lower-order n-gram models in estimating higher-order probabilities

  26. A general class of interpolated models is described by Jelinek and Mercer: • The nth-order smoothed model is defined recursively as a linear interpolation between the nth-order maximum likelihood model and the (n-1)-th-order smoothed model • Given fixed pML, it is possible to search efficiently for the factor that maximizes the probability of some data using the Baum–Welch algorithm

  27. In absolute discounting smoothing instead of multiplying the higher-order maximum-likelihood distribution by a factor , the higher-order distribution is created by subtracting a fixed discount D from each non-zero count: Values of D used in research: 0.3, 0.5, 1

More Related