1 / 7

CHANGE OF D1 LENGTH AND FIELD

Geneva, 18 th February 2014 HiLumi Parameter and Layout Committe. CHANGE OF D1 LENGTH AND FIELD. E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland On behalf of T. Nakamoto , Q. Xu Paper published at MT, Boston 2013. BASELINE. D1 is the separation dipole Superconductive , Nb-Ti, large aperture

josef
Télécharger la présentation

CHANGE OF D1 LENGTH AND FIELD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geneva, 18th February 2014 HiLumiParameter and LayoutCommitte CHANGE OF D1 LENGTH AND FIELD E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland On behalf of T. Nakamoto, Q. Xu Paperpublished at MT, Boston 2013

  2. BASELINE • D1 is the separation dipole • Superconductive, Nb-Ti, large aperture • Startedwith 160 mm aperture, thendecidedthat 10 mm more than quads was not neededafterebergydepositionstudies • 35 Tm required • 70% margin on the loadlinewaschosen, giving 5.2 T operationalfieldwith 15 mm one layer coil • Twolayersexcludedsincethismagnet has a lot of fringefieldalready Field veruscoilwidthin acceleratormagnets and models [E. Todesco, L. Rossi Malta workshop CERN 2011-003]

  3. VARIATIONS • The chosenmarginis large w.r.t. quadrupoles, which are in Nb3Sn and in similarregion for radiation and heatloads • Possible to decreasefrom 30% to 20-25% • At the same time the lengthcorresponding to 5.2 T and 35 Tm wasexceeding the vertical test station length at KEK • Study was carried out to explore the case of 25% margin and 20% margin • Options look viable, with increase of stress and fring field which appears to be tolerable [talk on 25 June 2013, T. Nakamoto and Q. Xu]

  4. threeOPTIONS AT 150 MM

  5. IMPACT ON FIELD QUALITY

  6. CONCLUSIONS • We propose to reduce the marginfrom 30% to 25%, i.e. increasing the operationalfieldfrom 5.2 to 5.6 T and reducinglengthfrom 6.7 to 6.3 m • Minimal change needed to fit the test station • Currentincreasefrom 11 to 12 kA

  7. SUMMARY

More Related